2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy is Sanders screaming?
Now, I will say, I don't mind...I'm just sick and tired of the "is Hillary screaming?" Why is Hillary screaming?" posts.
They get passionate...they get carried away. OK?
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)When she does it, she's shrieking . . .
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)When women get into politics, they are on the receiving end of a lot of hostility simply because they're women.
You can see it right here on DU.
It's pathetic.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)"Our standards are so strong, we've doubled them!"
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Thanks for sharing, nonetheless.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Response to Empowerer (Reply #1)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)But Most politicans do.
I don't see the big deal if they do.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Getting passionate, loud and screaming in a speech.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)in mockery and derision for days. That story held on in the news cycle for way too long.
Howard Dean is a man. He dared to shout! He screamed (gasp!)
The media and his opponents crucified him for it and used it as a hammer for the nails in his campaign coffin.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)But it's good when a man does it!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Good for you!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)There's no 'finally' about it.
He's a one trick pony.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)More importantly, KEEP ON LISTENING!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)so no, I won't listen.
As for Sanders himself, I don't care much for demagogues.
And politically he's as sophisticated at a sophomore student.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Like you said, you're beyond being consulted.
Sweet dreams
Response to KittyWampus (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)All that flailing about. Is he okay?
Thenewire
(130 posts)I'm so disillusioned at the amount of democrats who think he is right for the country. He is riding on the same fanaticism that propels other extremists. Do they really expect a 75 year old agnostic socialist to become president of this country?
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)a religious test for government positions?
Thanks!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I've seen people defend Kissinger ffs.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Is it too late for MIRT?
.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)enlightenment
(8,830 posts)"Amount" is used for uncountable nouns - like bravery or lunacy or bitter disappointment.
You are exhibiting a significant amount of bitterness at the moment.
A great number of democrats don't feel the same way.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Oh, like Franklin Roosevelt. Of course.
Response to HassleCat (Reply #31)
Post removed
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The vote was 5-2 to hide. Only we two dissenters wrote anything. Earth_First, I'm very glad that you responded before the hide, so that I have a hook on which to hang my thoughts. I was Juror #5.
On Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:25 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Sanders will be dead of old age
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1116543
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Really DU? even more agesit garbage is going to stand?
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:31 AM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude and inappropriate.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is the standard "No we can't" argument from Clinton supporters (who, of course, never face the fact that, with Republican control of Congress, Clinton will also be dead of old age before any of her ideas can be realized, except for those ideas that involve coddling Wall Street and starting imperialist wars). In this post, the standard anti-Sanders diatribe is couched in usually nasty and unnecessarily personal tones -- a connotation of ageism here, to go with the religious bigotry from the same poster in #23. Nevertheless, the underlying argument about the prospects for the next four years has some substance, even when accompanied by ageism, bigotry, and a gross double standard. I deem it better to let the post stand so that its (wisp of) substance can be answered.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a stupid post, but people don't need to be protected from stupidity.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.