New York Times’ Top Shareholder Is a Clinton Foundation Donor

[INdemo]

So were we really surprised that the NY Times endorsed Hillary? Of course not.

Dont we all know she will be endorsed by the millionaire,billionaire class and Wall St,Hedge fund managers,Golman Sachs,Bank America..I mean really are we suppose to be surprised?

http://freebeacon.com/politics/new-york-times-top-shareholder-is-a-clinton-foundation-donor/

[restorefreedom]

1. i am stunned. truly. the nyt is the bastion of progressive thought

[uponit7771]

2. Yeap !! The NYT, PP, NARAL, The media, Unions, blacks, gays and cute little puppies are all...

... apart of the establishment for Hillary!!!

or...

Sanders has done a horrible job of establishing relationships over the years with these groups and they've chosen not to endorse him?!

P.S. except for cute little puppies... they change their minds often... so...

[cali]

3. I don't think Carlos Slim has anything to do with it.

The NYT is a textbook illustration of an establishment entity. Look at its positions over the last century.

[ladjf]

4. Another piece of evidence that the "Establishment fix" is in. nt

[Hoyt]

5. Sounds like the Foundation does some worthy things. Of course, some can make a big

conspiracy out of it if so inclined.

[nichomachus]

7. The Salvation Army does some worthy things. So does the Mormon cult.

That doesn't mean that the people behind them don't do despicable things.

[amborin]

6. sorry, did not see this OP and started a new one;

imho, when the Clinton Foundation gets all these huge donations from these billionaires and corporations and industries, it makes it difficult, if not impossible, to take an objective stance toward them, let alone discipline them

[Ron Green]

8. When I saw this morning's front page false-equivalency piece

about Trump and Sanders, I had that very thought: that some big shareholders were connected in some way.