Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:12 AM Jan 2016

The Bernie bro narrative - a cheap false campaign tactic


The concoction of the “Bernie Bro” narrative by pro-Clinton journalists has been a potent political tactic – and a journalistic disgrace. It’s intended to imply two equally false claims: (1) a refusal to march enthusiastically behind the Wall-Street-enriched, multiple-war-advocating, despot-embracing Hillary Clinton is explainable not by ideology or political conviction, but largely if not exclusively by sexism: demonstrated by the fact that men, not women, support Sanders (his supporters are “bros”); and (2) Sanders supporters are uniquely abusive and misogynistic in their online behavior. Needless to say, a crucial tactical prong of this innuendo is that any attempt to refute it is itself proof of insensitivity to sexism if not sexism itself (as the accusatory reactions to this article will instantly illustrate).

It’s become such an all-purpose, handy pro-Clinton smear that even consummate, actual “bros” for which the term was originally coined – straight guys who act with entitlement and aggression, such as Paul Krugman – are now reflexively (and unironically) applying it to anyone who speaks ill of Hillary Clinton, even when they know nothing else about the people they’re smearing, including their gender, age or sexual orientation. Thus, a male policy analyst who criticized Sanders’ health care plan “is getting the Bernie Bro treatment,” sneered Krugman. Unfortunately for The New York Times Bro, that analyst, Charles Gaba, said in response that he’s “really not comfortable with [Krugman’s] referring to die-hard Bernie Sanders supporters as ‘Bernie Bros'” because it “implies that only college-age men support Sen. Sanders, which obviously isn’t the case.”

It is indeed “obviously not the case.” There are literally millions of women who support Sanders over Clinton. A new Iowa poll yesterday shows Sanders with a 15-point lead over Clinton among women under 45, while 1/3 of Iowa women over 45 support him. A USA Today/Rock-the-Vote poll from two weeks ago found Sanders nationally “with a 19-point lead over front-runner Hillary Clinton, 50% to 31%, among Democratic and independent women ages 18 to 34.” One has to be willing to belittle the views and erase the existence of a huge number of American women to wield this “Bernie Bro” smear.


https://theintercept.com/2016/01/31/the-bernie-bros-narrative-a-cheap-false-campaign-tactic-masquerading-as-journalism-and-social-activism/
86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Bernie bro narrative - a cheap false campaign tactic (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 OP
Yep. Smears. The Clintons are slimemasters. That is documented fact cali Jan 2016 #1
LOL! You think the Clintons came up with BernieBros? Funny how you can't refute the obnoxious KittyWampus Jan 2016 #15
immature internet behavior comes from all sides and movements retrowire Jan 2016 #46
... notadmblnd Jan 2016 #76
as someone who plans to vote o malley DonCoquixote Jan 2016 #67
Very well said, DC. senz Jan 2016 #82
It just seems like a swarm because there are so damn many of us.. frylock Jan 2016 #72
... ismnotwasm Jan 2016 #64
"straight guys who act with entitlement and aggression, such as Paul Krugman" Armstead Jan 2016 #2
Paul Krugman has been swarming blogs, facebook, twitter with nasty, obnoxious comments? KittyWampus Jan 2016 #17
He doesn't have to -- He has a national column and blog to do that Armstead Jan 2016 #18
DING DING DING! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #23
He doesn't have to. HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #21
I am a 62 year old female. SamKnause Jan 2016 #3
It is a determined effort by the Clinton campaign to Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #6
Which often times seems to backfire nolabels Jan 2016 #20
Excactly. It's a deflection. senz Jan 2016 #83
Just turned 60 on Jan 6, chervilant Jan 2016 #38
Same here. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #53
I had somebody 'accuse' me of being a snort Jan 2016 #61
Fucking A !!!!! SamKnause Jan 2016 #66
This 50-something female is right there with you. Matariki Jan 2016 #73
Isn't "Bernie-bro" and accepted term by the group it represents? Renew Deal Jan 2016 #4
Are the protocols for such nicknames usually the same for those in the group and for those outside Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #8
Generally I would think so Renew Deal Jan 2016 #10
So you think that if you hear a minority group refer to each other in a certain way you are free to Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #48
This is not a minority group. This is a political campaign. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #55
Only in the sense of adopting an insult to defuse it Armstead Jan 2016 #19
That makes sense Renew Deal Jan 2016 #22
Used as what? An object of Hillarious Imagination? ErisDiscordia Jan 2016 #30
You may have seen me use it Z_California Jan 2016 #69
Thanks Renew Deal Jan 2016 #70
Just shows you how desperate they are, they can't run on issues so they resort to cheap shots. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #5
Al Franken would agree with you. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #12
Al Franken's endorsement was met with mild disagreement. frylock Jan 2016 #74
That article cites numbers from Iowa which is not representative of America as a whole. DCBob Jan 2016 #7
I'd say it cites the State that is about to hold an election while the bulk of the other States are Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #9
I would not say national polling is "absurdly speculative". DCBob Jan 2016 #11
A win is a win. A first win shifts the conversation. As you well know, the national politics is libdem4life Jan 2016 #16
The Reality of Bernie Bros and their female counterparts has played out even here on DU. KittyWampus Jan 2016 #13
i got a rebuttal retrowire Jan 2016 #50
n/t SamKnause Jan 2016 #59
C'mon get with it! snort Jan 2016 #65
By demographics I fall into the Bernie Bro category... Docreed2003 Jan 2016 #14
It didn't sound like bragging to me farleftlib Jan 2016 #25
Interesting, Mbrow Jan 2016 #36
kewl farleftlib Jan 2016 #41
Yeah we're certainly an atypical group... Docreed2003 Jan 2016 #44
It will be nice to have Publicly Funded Elections where the campaign season will be only a few Dustlawyer Jan 2016 #24
Amen! ErisDiscordia Jan 2016 #31
Objecting to the name? OK. But trying to deny that Bernie supporters online are DanTex Jan 2016 #26
You have selective visioin. Hillary supporters get plenty of time outs on DU and a few have been PPR Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #34
It's no surprise that juries are tougher on Hillary supporters than Bernie supporters, given that DanTex Jan 2016 #35
That's a silly excuse. Why not own up to the humanity of your own cohort? Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #45
It's not an excuse, it's a fact. And it's obvious. The fact that you can't even bring yourself to DanTex Jan 2016 #47
It's an excuse. Look at your own comments in this thread, your first is a smear of Bernie supporters Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #51
Do you not think that in an 85-15 environment, juries are going to be significantly DanTex Jan 2016 #52
Bullpucky gregcrawford Jan 2016 #62
No. Hillary supporters regularly interrupt peaceful Bernie threads with senz Jan 2016 #84
Krugman and Walsh both said the same sorts of things about Obama and his supporters in 08. Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #27
Righteous! JimDandy Jan 2016 #68
Everything but the issues, as she looks more like a Republican everyday . orpupilofnature57 Jan 2016 #28
It's extremely sexist and points out the rank hypocrisy of so many CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #29
It's also extremely untrue, ditto! ErisDiscordia Jan 2016 #32
"....the Wall-Street-enriched, multiple-war-advocating, despot-embracing Hillary Clinton.." m-lekktor Jan 2016 #33
Considering Sanders marched with MLK it could easily be misunderstood as a racist attack. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #37
The plutocrats needed new packaging for their product. jalan48 Jan 2016 #39
Im a 65 year old woman thinking with my head Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #40
I agree Nanjeanne. Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #79
Excellent opinion piece. blackspade Jan 2016 #42
Stuff like this makes it seem like Karl Rove is advising Hillary's campaign nichomachus Jan 2016 #43
Corporations don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican. RufusTFirefly Jan 2016 #49
There was that same kind of problem back in 1770's nolabels Jan 2016 #58
You guys can really dish it out, but you just can't take it. Nitram Jan 2016 #54
I get it...you don't like it pandr32 Jan 2016 #56
A great piece. n/t DirkGently Jan 2016 #57
Boys! Ick! nt lumberjack_jeff Jan 2016 #60
and they get by with this sexist crap but, god forbid if it goes the other way around. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #63
Yes exactly. You can tell how manufactured it is by the language that's used. Matariki Jan 2016 #71
Hordes of Berniebro marauders. frylock Jan 2016 #75
In purple gingham! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #85
Great job on Greenwald's part in exposing something that was always counterintuitive. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #77
Pres. Obama gets it so much worse from all quarters and one never hears him whine about it. aikoaiko Jan 2016 #78
This thread is just an attempt Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #80
Warren Stupidity Smearer... Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #81
"Bernie Bro" must be the creation of Hillary's highly paid cadre of "aides" senz Jan 2016 #86
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
15. LOL! You think the Clintons came up with BernieBros? Funny how you can't refute the obnoxious
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jan 2016

and immature internet behavior. But HEY, BernieBros aren't all guys.

Or rather, on the internet they MAY not be mostly guys.

But a helluva lot of them swarm anyone who endorses Clinton.

Sanders campaign has apologized for them and tried to tell them to rein it in. To no effect.

They seem to ignore O'Malley.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
46. immature internet behavior comes from all sides and movements
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016

case in point... your post right here.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
67. as someone who plans to vote o malley
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jan 2016

I can tell you this article is true: not everyone who dislikes POSITIONS and ACTIONS Hillary has taken and IS taking is a sexist, and just like in 2008, people are using that term to make anyone who points out those positions and actions of Hillary to shut up or risk being demonized. Meanwhile many of the women whose family members would risk being sent to Syria, those female soldiers who have already done five tours in the middle east, those women who have had their houses stolen by bankers, or who are in hock for medical bills, are all magically erased from perception because all who are HURT by Hillary are supposedly all sexist college age white males.

This would not be so sad if this was not a proven failure of a technique. Hillary could have run a successful 2016 campaign, but instead, she is running the same campaign she did in 2008, with the same people, and for the benefit of those who seemed to think we could roll things back to 2008 and have that promised kingdom denied us by Obama. Obama is the person they exploit for the Afro-American vote, yet they sick out Krugman, who talked about him in the condescending, patronizing tone that many non-whites have heard come out of some "liberal" mouths, and who has resumed that same talk as he thinks he will get that cabinet position that Obama failed to hand him on a silver platter.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
72. It just seems like a swarm because there are so damn many of us..
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

and we are EVERYWHERE! We are the people you depend on. We cook your meals. We haul your trash. We connect your calls. We drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not fuck with us.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
3. I am a 62 year old female.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jan 2016

I support Bernie 100%.

I guess I am a Bernie Bro.

I am not on Facebook.

I am not on Twitter.

This is the only site I blog on.

I vote in every online poll after debates and forums.


FEEL THE BERN

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
6. It is a determined effort by the Clinton campaign to
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jan 2016

make the contest about anything other than the substantive policy differences between Sanders and Clinton

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
20. Which often times seems to backfire
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jan 2016

That idea that you can be your own worst enemy often comes true when you get to point of being too full of yourself. It's funny and seems that they have such hard case to crack. If they attack Bernie on issues, personality, legislation or just about anything then that meme about contrasting to their side which makes avenue problematic for them. They then would want to attack people around him but mostly they are mostly volunteer so bad things and bad ideas are not following them around much.

I guess one of the things they have left to attack are the millions of contributors to his campaign, lets see how that goes

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
38. Just turned 60 on Jan 6,
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:39 AM
Jan 2016

and I have been feeling the BERN since the very beginning.

I guess I must be a "Bernie Bro," too.

Sad, how low some will go to smear Bernie Sanders (and his supporters), but I know we'll prevail.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,731 posts)
53. Same here.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:25 PM
Jan 2016

I'm an old lady with cats, kind of the opposite of a "bro." I don't comment on Facebook or Twitter; I don't "swarm" anybody, I just vote. My cat-loving old lady friends are also supporting Bernie. I don't even know any "bros."

snort

(2,334 posts)
61. I had somebody 'accuse' me of being a
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:52 PM
Jan 2016

Berniebro. I said "Thank you, I'll donate some more to his campaign right now". And so I did. Easy squeezy. I'm not sure what the hell a Berniebro is, but I'll take it and wear it, same as I do with Liberal and Progressive. Cuz fuck it.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
73. This 50-something female is right there with you.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jan 2016

I don't see Clinton as entitled just because she's a Clinton. Or a woman. Her positions are wrong.

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
4. Isn't "Bernie-bro" and accepted term by the group it represents?
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jan 2016

I thought I saw it used on DU by Sanders supporters.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
8. Are the protocols for such nicknames usually the same for those in the group and for those outside
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:43 AM
Jan 2016

the group? I mean in general if you here people use a certain term about one another do you feel entitled to then also use it about them? I find that that is not a very wise or respectful choice in many cases.

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
10. Generally I would think so
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:50 AM
Jan 2016

If they use it in a positive manner.

That's the first time I've used it. I am not clear if it's a nickname or an insult like "teabagger".

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
48. So you think that if you hear a minority group refer to each other in a certain way you are free to
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:11 PM
Jan 2016

do the same? Seriously?

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
55. This is not a minority group. This is a political campaign.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jan 2016

I would think that most people wouldn't voluntarily hurl insults at each other.

Z_California

(650 posts)
69. You may have seen me use it
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jan 2016

And missed the sarcasm and irony.

Berniebro is a tool of the disgusting identity politics that Hillary has always used and exploited.

A poster who wields the term in earnest instantly loses any credibility.

It's in the same category as "libtard"

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
5. Just shows you how desperate they are, they can't run on issues so they resort to cheap shots.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jan 2016

Inventing new slurs to shame enthusiastic supporters, just like they slimed Obama supporters in 2008.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
74. Al Franken's endorsement was met with mild disagreement.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

I can understand how upsetting that can be to the tender sensibilities of some people though.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
7. That article cites numbers from Iowa which is not representative of America as a whole.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:31 AM
Jan 2016

Overall the entire country I believe the numbers support the notion that Bernie is the candidate favored by younger voters, whites and males.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
9. I'd say it cites the State that is about to hold an election while the bulk of the other States are
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jan 2016

still further out from their own elections. Today, Iowa is the electorate in question not the national. Today the national numbers are absurdly speculative. Iowa happens tomorrow. Not in three months. Tomorrow.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
11. I would not say national polling is "absurdly speculative".
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:50 AM
Jan 2016

What's absurdly speculative is basing a judgment on anything on a single state... especially one like Iowa which is one of least representative states in the country.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
16. A win is a win. A first win shifts the conversation. As you well know, the national politics is
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jan 2016

very sensitive to real results...either way. If it's different than expected, the undecideds and previously uninvolved often take another look. I don't think anyone is being "absurdly speculative"...but I do accept your opinion.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
13. The Reality of Bernie Bros and their female counterparts has played out even here on DU.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:52 AM
Jan 2016

It's also been well documented.

So if you want to argue all the swarming, nasty ideologues who harass, bully and censor those who don't support Sanders, that only means you can't refute the inexcusably obnoxious and CHILDISH behavior so many Sanders supporters engage in while on the internet.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
50. i got a rebuttal
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:12 PM
Jan 2016

we never made sites like jackassradicals or Hillary supporters.com

all sides have trolls. but I don't recall Bernie fans going that far.

snort

(2,334 posts)
65. C'mon get with it!
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:59 PM
Jan 2016

Have you actually checked for a 'BerniebrosForPresidentcuzwehateHillarynowhandmeanotherlatte.com'? No? Then you can't say that.

Docreed2003

(16,862 posts)
14. By demographics I fall into the Bernie Bro category...
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:53 AM
Jan 2016

I'm male, white, and from the South. That's the surface, but not the entire picture. My grandparents were FDR Dems. I was brought up in a world that abhorred racial inequality, because their friends had been victimized by Jim Crow laws of the era and when my grandparents had the oppportunity to own a store of their own, that country grocery store had no barriers of race, that was the 1950's. My mother was a strong woman who, for a period of time, raised me as a single mom until my dad, who adopted me at a young age, and she married. The idea that women were inferior to men was never, ever entertained in our home. Mom was Southern Baptist, dad was, as I describe it, an agnostic Catholic. Truth be told both had some conservative beliefs but a woman's right to choose was something both believed strongly in, something I can remember both commenting on as a teenager and they both fought for candidates who held pro-choice beliefs. In the 90's, I was in college when one of my childhood best friends confided in me that he was gay. I had always known but never thought to judge, mainly because I had grown up with two uncles who had lived together for years. My friend and his husband, the love of his life, recently were able to marry thanks to same sex marriage being approved for all. I'm sure there will be people who read my post and think, "Well he's just ticking off his progressive boxes to try and impress". Maybe so, but I'm not bragging, just peeling back the layers of my own story. So I'm a BernieBro, it seems....but I don't think I'm any less liberal than any other Democratic demographic. I'm just one dude, trying to do my part to make my small part of the world a better place. I think most of us feel the same.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
25. It didn't sound like bragging to me
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:12 AM
Jan 2016

At the risk of sounding totally ignorant, your description of your upbringing sounds atypical for the place and time. Thanks for posting it. Bernie Sanders supporters are from all walks of life. I'm a baby-boomer female from a large metropolitan city in the mid-atlantic and my parents were strong Dems but somewhat socially conservative. IOW, I'm the leftiest person in my family and if the term BernieBro fits, then I'll wear it proudly.

Mbrow

(1,090 posts)
36. Interesting,
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:31 AM
Jan 2016

My family was blue collar all the way and my father and mother raised in all white northern rural Michigan. while we weren't so poor as not to have food I do remember a lot of cheap meals (never notice until much later in life looking back) so to the point, my father was one of the most un-bigoted men I knew, he always treated POC with respect, supported my mother going to college to get her degree. when he worked at GMC (union member) he always stood strong with the union and was not afraid to criticize it if it was wrong. You would be surprised at how many people in the poorer and rural areas are like that, hell one of our best family friend is gay and my Dad always treated him as family as well, It really not that usual. Our county here in Idaho is 99% LDS outside of town and 35% in town voted 37% for Obama.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
41. kewl
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jan 2016

Nice to meetcha. I love hearing the about the background of DUers. I also remember those cheap meals growing up, but we thought it was yummy good stuff at the time. Luckily my mom was a good cook and could make the cheap cuts and humble ingredients taste good. I always say I'm lucky in that I know how to be "poor." Vacations were day trips to the beach if we were lucky, but we had relatives who lived in rural NJ and visiting them was an adventure to us city kids. We felt like we had the best of both worlds and in a real sense we did.

Mom and Dad are very pro-labor and remarkably open-minded about race and sexual orientation, it was just stuff like the death penalty (pro ) and being Catholic, rather anti-choice. They're both in a nursing home now and it's hard not being able to share all this Bernie enthusiasm with them. I know my dad especially would love him but he's got Alzheimer's so politics has gone by the wayside. I used to love the stories he'd tell about the cool liberal stuff he was involved with when he was a younger man, it definitely shaped my worldview and my politics. He especially admonished us to question everything. Oh well, I could go on and on. Thanks for your reply

Docreed2003

(16,862 posts)
44. Yeah we're certainly an atypical group...
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:07 PM
Jan 2016

I'm a Gen X'er myself. I think that all we can do is continue to fight through the BS attacks and keep getting the message out!

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
24. It will be nice to have Publicly Funded Elections where the campaign season will be only a few
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:02 AM
Jan 2016

months long and there won't be so much money to make all of the personal attacks and campaign BS! We don't need two years of this crap each Presidential election cycle.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
26. Objecting to the name? OK. But trying to deny that Bernie supporters online are
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jan 2016

prone to smearing anyone who doesn't fall in line, much more so than Hillary supporters, is just silly.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
34. You have selective visioin. Hillary supporters get plenty of time outs on DU and a few have been PPR
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jan 2016

One of them spent months taking pot shots at Bernie only to be PPR'd for posting extreme antisemitic materials after the Paris shootings. That one also smeared LGBT regularly while retaining a great popularity among her cohort. I had posts hidden by her friends just for quoting her bigoted filth. She was protected by those who shared her candidate, in spite of what she was actually saying and doing on DU.

Any and all campaigns will contain persons of all sorts. To win the WH the required electorate is so vast that it will have actual criminals in it, also it will have pretenders who feign support to rat fuck their rivals, cranks who take part only to be cranks, and of course also lovely people supporting for all the right reasons.

DUers who are today 'Hillary supporters' have in the past been Hillary bashers. Some who smear Bernie use the same smears they used against Barack.

So go try to see your theory to those who are not paying attention. I could link all day to examples, but you'd just alert because the truth is a difficult thing for you folks who need to believe your own press.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
35. It's no surprise that juries are tougher on Hillary supporters than Bernie supporters, given that
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jan 2016

DU breaks about 85-15 Bernie. But the fact that the DU jury system systematically favors the majority has nothing to do with which side is worse behaved.

It's so obvious that even Bernie's campaign has taken notice. Anyone who writes something critical of Bernie or supportive of Hillary gets smeared on line. Do you think Robert Reich's facebook page got hit with a huge number of insults when he endorsed Bernie?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
45. That's a silly excuse. Why not own up to the humanity of your own cohort?
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016

Your side has surly, shitty people just as the other side does. What I note about your response is the lack of responsiveness. You do not actually address what I have said to you, which was quite a bit. You want to deny it but that's just daft.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
47. It's not an excuse, it's a fact. And it's obvious. The fact that you can't even bring yourself to
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:10 PM
Jan 2016

admit that in a partisan environment, randomly selected juries are going to be tougher on people in the minority, is yet another indication of the lengths that Bernie fans will go to to delude themselves about their collective behavior.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
51. It's an excuse. Look at your own comments in this thread, your first is a smear of Bernie supporters
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jan 2016

presented along with a claim that Hillary supporters don't do anything bad at all. It's not just an excuse it is a proactive evasion of the facts at hand requiring you to fully ignore everything I say to you. Even here you are using 'Bernie fans' while I say 'Hillary supporters'. And you are attacking me while I am being critical of your verbiage and specific evasion of what I am saying to you. You insult me and continue ranting away as if I had said nothing.

Mean spirited and lacking in introspection.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
52. Do you not think that in an 85-15 environment, juries are going to be significantly
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:22 PM
Jan 2016

tougher on pro-Hillary posts than pro-Bernie posts?

Right now there's an op calling Hillary "evil". You think an OP calling Bernie "evil" would even survive, much less get 67 recs and counting?

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
62. Bullpucky
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:54 PM
Jan 2016

If you're going to make a blanket condemnation, it behooves you to document it. I got banned from the Hillary group just for asking a perfectly reasonable question, and that was before Bernie had even announced his candidacy. The most vitriolic malice I have witnessed has come from those with funny little Hs as their avatar.

Hillary's own record is her worst enemy, and her choice of "friends" doesn't help much, either. I mean, Henry fucking KISSINGER?!!? Really?

If she does win the nomination, I will support her. Can you say the same if Sanders wins it?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
84. No. Hillary supporters regularly interrupt peaceful Bernie threads with
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jan 2016

insults, sarcasm, ridicule, and one upsmanship in droves. It's ugly, and usually when I see a thread is loaded with Hill supporters, I won't click on it.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
27. Krugman and Walsh both said the same sorts of things about Obama and his supporters in 08.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:14 AM
Jan 2016

Makes both of them look like hacks who phone in a template every cycle.

Walsh 08: " On Saturday, Harriet Christian replaced Ferraro as the overwrought voice of white female resentment. There she was at the Democratic National Committee meeting, screaming at reporters that Democrats were about to nominate “an inadequate black male who would not have been running had it not been a white woman that was running for president.”

Beyond Christian’s deplorable reference to Obama as an “inadequate black male” was a wail worth hearing. She also said, “I’m proud to be an older American woman!” I can feel her pain."
http://www.salon.com/2008/06/05/obama_54/

Yet recently Joan has had no problem whatsoever calling Bernie an “old socialist inured to being told he’s wrong". I think if you are critical of those who make age an issue for your candidate then smear another with his own age you are a hypocrite. She uses double standards, this year for Bernie and in 08 the same for Obama. She's always willing to dip into the Harriet Christian well to find what she needs to say. 'Over look the racism of my peers and see that they object to sexism and ageism unlike that old socialist man'.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
33. "....the Wall-Street-enriched, multiple-war-advocating, despot-embracing Hillary Clinton.."
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jan 2016

I can't imagine what mental tricks one would have to play with oneself to view her otherwise. She represents everything that is WRONG with politicians, let alone one who is supposed to be a Democrat, the better of the two parties. Supposedly.

jalan48

(13,869 posts)
39. The plutocrats needed new packaging for their product.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

They came up with, "The First Woman POTUS". Gullible liberals were supposed to fall dutifully in line, questioning what the candidate stood for was not to be allowed. This was about, "The First Woman POTUS". It seemed to be working wonderfully until Bernie came along and steered the conversation back to actual issues that effect EVERYONE.

Nanjeanne

(4,960 posts)
40. Im a 65 year old woman thinking with my head
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:49 AM
Jan 2016

I have zero interest in simply promoting a woman to the highest office in the country. I would love a woman as President. But not Clinton, not Fiorina, not Nikki Haley, not Jodi Ernst. I'll wait for the right woman -- not any woman.

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
79. I agree Nanjeanne.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jan 2016

Well said! I am voting for Bernie because of his policies and I hope to vote for a woman in the future for her policies.

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
43. Stuff like this makes it seem like Karl Rove is advising Hillary's campaign
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jan 2016

The Bernie Bro smear has the stench of Rove all over it.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
49. Corporations don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:11 PM
Jan 2016

And they don't care how you do it. Just as long as you bring home the bacon for them.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
58. There was that same kind of problem back in 1770's
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jan 2016

The profits for the East Indie corporation were to first and foremost and everything else be damned.

What a small world we live in

Nitram

(22,811 posts)
54. You guys can really dish it out, but you just can't take it.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jan 2016

And in this case, I've seen evidence of the truth of it on DU.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
63. and they get by with this sexist crap but, god forbid if it goes the other way around.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jan 2016

the double standard is not attractive.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
71. Yes exactly. You can tell how manufactured it is by the language that's used.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

For instance this Boston Globe article that refers to his supporters as 'bands of “Bernie Bros”'. "Bands"?? Like roving bandits or wolves or worse?

So transparent.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
77. Great job on Greenwald's part in exposing something that was always counterintuitive.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

There's been an attempt to map frat boy douchebag behavior onto a group that is far to the left of the group making the accusations.

It's kind of like the Pi Kappa Alphas are accusing the chess club of being frat boys.

aikoaiko

(34,170 posts)
78. Pres. Obama gets it so much worse from all quarters and one never hears him whine about it.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:47 PM
Jan 2016

I don't understand why the HRC surrogates can't handle a little social media heat and vulgarities.

Its definitely a HRC strategy.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
86. "Bernie Bro" must be the creation of Hillary's highly paid cadre of "aides"
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jan 2016

in their nonstop effort to denigrate everyone and everything connected to Senator Sanders.

She knows she can't win on the issues.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Bernie bro narrative ...