Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Takes Her Adviser’s Side, Attacking Big Banks but Not BlackRock
Hillary Clinton has received a mixture of plaudits and qualified skepticism for her Wall Street reform plan. She insists that the plan is tougher than those of her Democratic presidential rivals, because it targets more participants in the financial industry beyond the big banks.
But Clintons plan was mute on a key sector of the industry: asset management firms, like BlackRock or Vanguard or Fidelity, which control a staggering $30 trillion in global wealth.
And a number of Clintons ideas mirror the preferences of leading asset managers, who would profit from crackdowns on their competition the big banks while they get a pass.
Thats probably not a coincidence. Cheryl Mills, arguably Clintons closest adviser, sits on the board of directors of BlackRock, the largest asset management firm in the world, with $4.5 trillion in investor assets.
https://theintercept.com/2015/10/21/clinton-takes-her-advisers-side-attacking-big-banks-but-not-blackrock/
But Clintons plan was mute on a key sector of the industry: asset management firms, like BlackRock or Vanguard or Fidelity, which control a staggering $30 trillion in global wealth.
And a number of Clintons ideas mirror the preferences of leading asset managers, who would profit from crackdowns on their competition the big banks while they get a pass.
Thats probably not a coincidence. Cheryl Mills, arguably Clintons closest adviser, sits on the board of directors of BlackRock, the largest asset management firm in the world, with $4.5 trillion in investor assets.
https://theintercept.com/2015/10/21/clinton-takes-her-advisers-side-attacking-big-banks-but-not-blackrock/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 501 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Takes Her Adviser’s Side, Attacking Big Banks but Not BlackRock (Original Post)
FreakinDJ
Jan 2016
OP
cali
(114,904 posts)1. What a joke.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)2. No - its just plain sleazy
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)3. The cozy governement-to-corporate pipeline
is at the heart of the problem.
"Mills was elected to BlackRocks board in October 2013, months after the end of her tenure at the State Department. BlackRocks announcement highlighted Mills ties to Clinton in its opening sentence."
In ethics, it was once called conflict of interest. Now its called synergy.
I can see Hyman Roth in the Godfather - "We now have true partnership with government"