Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 06:12 PM Jan 2016

Stop the Insanity: Something FAR worse than TPP on the Horizon.

BERNIE Is the ONLY Candidate who would oppose this.

Robert Reich on FB

As awful as is the Trans Pacific Partnership, there’s something even worse on the horizon: It’s called the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) -- currently being negotiated in Geneva, Switzerland with 51 participants representing 70 percent of the world's trade in services. Even more secrecy surrounds TISA than TPP, but the parts that have been released by WikiLeaks show TISA would dramatically reduce how much governments can protect their own peoples’ health, safety, labor, and even the environment.

For example, governments wouldn’t be able to regulate staff to patient ratios in hospitals, prevent banks from becoming too large, ban fracking, improve safety controls on airlines, refuse accreditation to schools and universities, or prevent the importation of genetically modified foods. And governments couldn’t restrict foreign investment – they’d have to allow global corporations to run public services such as communications, postal services, health care, even education. Giant banks and other global financial institutions would have the power to transfer client data out of a country regardless of national privacy laws or banking regulations. And global corporations would have the right to comment on any new proposed national regulations, and contest them in a dispute mechanism similar to the investor-state dispute settlement in the Trans Pacific Partnership – where the corporations can get compensated for any “expected future profits” lost through such regulations.

The fast-track authority already granted the Trans Pacific Partnership – moving through Congress without amendment – would apply to TISA as well, since fast track lasts six years. Which means TISA is already being teed up. Yet not one presidential candidate has been asked about or said anything about TISA. Europeans have been loudly demonstrating against this global corporate takeover of their democracies. We should be making a ruckus, too.

What do you think? If you're European, what's the view of TISA from there?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027302973

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
8. This is an attempt at global conquest.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 06:31 PM
Jan 2016

Plan and simple. A replacement of one form of bureaucracy for another. The sovereignty of individual states, into the sovereignty of the wealthy.

The completed form of rule by "the Divine Right of Kings" (the rejection of which multiple wars were fought over) transforming into rule by "the Sublime Right of Money".

The utter rejection of "All Men Are Created Equal".

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
11. I remember people laughed at the term "New World Order" a few years ago.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 07:07 PM
Jan 2016

Kind of hard to even imagine that a country would give up its sovereignty.
But that is what is happening, all over the globe, bit by bit.
Euro zone was the first step of the experiment.

And now, here, enough politicians have been bought and paid for that there can be no stopping it.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
6. This is why I will only vote for someone with a LONG record of fighting against trade agreements.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jan 2016

Words that you are against the TPP and Trade agreements are meaningless.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
7. We absolutely need Bernie in the Presidency to stop TISA, TTIP, and he might
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 06:30 PM
Jan 2016

even have a chance to stop TPP if they can't get the deed done this year.

He's the only one I trust to stop these. I completely agree.

smiley

(1,432 posts)
12. I hate to be cynical.... but
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jan 2016

something with that much power behind it is unstoppable. If TPTB want it, then it will happen. If TTP or TISA is stopped, they will only take another form.

Bernie may have the power to slow it down but he won't be here forever. The kind of power that is behind these trade agreements doesn't give up.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
9. OMG, I didn't think anything could be worse than TPP
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jan 2016

but TISA is a nightmare in the making, and they're sneaking this under the radar in Geneva! Then on fast track thru Congress. Thanks for posting this, I think.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
10. Robert Reich, the man who is probably most responsible for NAFTA and even a few years ago said the
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jan 2016

only mistake was not to add strong Labor and Environmental protections (NAFTA also has the investor dispute mechanism, just like TPP). Reich is looking for a job.

It's gonna take our "sovereignty" -- have people gone nuts?

?w=1094&h=446

Bumper stickers associated with the sovereign citizens movement (photo from the Southern Law Poverty Center)



I have faith Europe knows what they are doing -- including Sanders' favorite, Denmark.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
16. He's changed his views on free trade.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:41 PM
Jan 2016

I used to believe in "free trade" agreements, until I took a hard look at the numbers. NAFTA cost U.S. workers almost 700,000 jobs. Since the Korea–U.S. Free Trade Agreement, America's trade deficit with Korea has grown more than 80 percent, the equivalent of a loss of more than 70,000 additional U.S. jobs. Since China’s admission to the World Trade Organization, the U.S. goods trade deficit with China increased $23.9 billion (7.5 percent) to $342.6 billion.

Trade deals the fail to address currency manipulation or to effectively address labor standards -- while protecting the intellectual property of global corporate investors and the financial asset of Wall Street -- aren't even about trade, since tariffs are already very low. They're really about enhancing corporate and financial profits at the expense of American workers. That's why I urge you to tell your representatives in Washington not to give the President fast-track authority to negotiate the Trans Pacific Partnership.

What's your view?

https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/950807244931872
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Stop the Insanity: Somet...