What? The pundits are saying that

[OrwellwasRight]

when Hillary Clinton yelled at the college kid who said she isn't trustworthy it was her best answer?

I found it painful to listen to and would have felt condescended to had it been my question. I thought that answer was a disaster. She got better after that, but WTF with the pundits?

[winter is coming]

1. What's the biggest dragon she needs to kill?

Trustworthiness, or rather, her lack of it.

Of course the pundits were going to say that.

[OrwellwasRight]

4. But come on,

she actually had some good answers. That wasn't one of them. The press drives me bananas.

[99th_Monkey]

2. In case you hadn't noticed, this whole evening on CNN has been about taking Bernie down

every last piece, from beginning to end, has been about that.

CNN, owned by Time/Warner, one of Hillary's biggest donors and supporters.

[OrwellwasRight]

8. No question that objectivity was, shall we say, lacking.

[Empowerer]

11. E'erbody's picking on Bernie

Poor Bernie . . .

[99th_Monkey]

12. I know I'm not supposed to notice when CNN/Time/Warner/HRC stacks a "Forum" for Hills

or else I'll be trashed as "CT" and 'playing victim', so you can snark & patronize.

Goat and preen and strut your ass off for all I care .. I know a set-up when my
lying eyes sees one.

[cui bono]

13. Yeah, some people even criticized his slogan.

Sheesh.

.

[demwing]

3. we know the game is rigged

it would surprise me if the pundits were honest,

[OrwellwasRight]

7. But shouldn't they at least try to say something

remotely resembling reality?

[winter is coming]

9. Why start now? n/t

[OrwellwasRight]

10. To keep up appearances . . .

you know so that casual news consumers aren't as turned off as those of us who see the hegemony?

[Fawke Em]

5. Well, social media disagrees.

https://twitter.com/DanSWright/status/691838880954347520

[OrwellwasRight]

6. That social media seems to say it was the best QUESTION.

Didn't necessarily express an opinion on the ANSWER.

[840high]

14. ..+1