Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

renie408

(9,854 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:08 PM Feb 2012

Did I get this wrong? Isn't the deal that they have to OFFER contraception?

It isn't like Barack Obama is personally driving to every Catholic church employee's home and forcing birth control pills down their throats. If they don't want to take the damn pills, they don't take the damn pills. Or shots or whatever. This is only a big deal because what passes for 'news' these days doesn't want to talk about anything that really IS important. And everybody is always so damn happy to jump when they say 'froggy' and get into a snit about whatever made up piece of shit news story they fan the flames on. Ugh.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
1. I dont even think they have to offer it. They just cant deny access or at least the same access that
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:10 PM
Feb 2012

others have. And it isnt even Catholics, it's any employee.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
2. YUP ... catholic institutions should have no problem because none of their
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:12 PM
Feb 2012

employees would ever use this element of Health care.

Their employees would see the choice, and not use it.

Or does the church not trust its members?

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
5. They hire thousands on NON-Catholics.. What they want to do is refuse
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:33 PM
Feb 2012

other people, who have no objections to birth control the coverage that everyone else will get.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
6. Oh yes, no arguement there.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:52 PM
Feb 2012

Maybe a better way to say it would be that they don't trust their own parishioners, and they also want to "control and convert" non-Catholics into that same world view.

LiberalFighter

(50,942 posts)
10. Catholics (bosses) are idiotics when rationalizing
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:49 PM
Feb 2012

It's like they want their employees to get pregnant so their cost share of the medical expenses goes up. As well as the higher cost involved in training someone to do the job of the pregnant worker that goes out on medical.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
16. Exactly! This shows where they are really coming from.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 12:40 AM
Feb 2012

They know women want it, and they want it out of those women's reach, whether it be price or any other restriction!

elleng

(130,935 posts)
3. The heart of this issue is
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:20 PM
Feb 2012

requiring Catholic institutions to include in their health insurance choices, for employees, contraception options, which it is assumed costs those Catholic insitutions something. I am not sure that it does, in fact, cost them anything, but it might. I do think that's a legitimate concern, but quite marginal and NOT worthy of the huge kerfuffle it's caused.

As to 'news,' some repugs and media NEED kerfuffles.

ejpoeta

(8,933 posts)
7. it costs less than nine months of prenatal care and
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 06:09 AM
Feb 2012

a labor and delivery room and all the other stuff that goes along with childbirth.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
11. You're missing the point
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 03:42 PM
Feb 2012

The right-wing here is just doing what it likes to do: Refusing to let a good opportunity to stir up a controversy (where none should logically exist) go to waste, particularly during an election year. In a few months (maybe even weeks), they'll have moved on to something else b/c eventually the furor is going to die down due to the facts coming out and people starting to think more rationally about the situation and the right-wing, having milked everything it can out of it, will move on to the next "manufactroversy".

renie408

(9,854 posts)
13. That's weird, cause I thought that was exactly the point I was trying to make.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:39 PM
Feb 2012

That this is a non-issue that is being whipped into a frenzy by some members of the media.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
12. It really seems to me that the bishops have been
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 04:40 PM
Feb 2012

scraping the barrel to come up with a reason to oppose Obama. However, even the very left wing National Catholic Reporter has been publishing news stories suggesting that Catholics who agree with the ruling will still feel that the Church has been dissed. Within its pages, some columnists support the ruling, some support the bishops.

http://ncronline.org/

If it becomes framed as an attempt to deny birth control, the bishops lose. If it gets framed as a religious rights issue, the bishops might steal some voters from Obama on this one.

fire_guy266

(10 posts)
14. I think this is going to backfire on the TGOP
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:04 PM
Feb 2012

It's a non issue. Boehner and Cantor were invitedt to the Capital to work on the Affordable Health Care Act. Cantor commented on the length of the bill. Boehner sat there stone faced. If Boehner had actaully read the bill and worked with the president, he might have been able negotiate about this. It's total GOP BS talking points. So, the GOP is against any health insurance that offers contraception? They tried to pull this crap with the Susan G Kohmen charity. It's a losing proposition. I encourage everyone to get on Bohner's Facebook and Twitter and tell him do work on some real issue instead of wasting the money that we are paying him with our hard earned tax dollars. It's important the Boehner knows that many of consider him an idiot. Have you noticed that catholics are having smaller families than they did 20 years ago. Must be a miracle! Immaculate contraception!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Did I get this wrong? Isn...