2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders promises more than he could deliver — thankfullym - StarTribune editorial
Viewers got a substantive back-and-forth among the top Democratic presidential candidates on Sunday night, one that could provide a good foundation for determining support as the election draws near.
Sen. Bernie Sanders came across as the ideological firebrand of the race, given to sweeping statements and epic proposals that promise far more than a President Sanders could ever deliver. And in the case of his pronouncements on the evils of Wall Street and corporate America, thats a good thing. Income inequality has certainly grown and must be addressed. But the world is not so dark as Sanders paints it. In his zeal to right wrongs, his proposals should they ever come to pass likely would bankrupt the American economy and put businesses at too severe a disadvantage in a global marketplace.
Hillary Clinton left no doubt that she is the incrementalist. Where Sanders talks of a massive single-payer plan that would leave no health want unsatisfied, Clinton aims lower: tweaking the Affordable Care Act, tackling the high cost of prescription drugs, looking for manageable ways to curb costs. These goals are not visionary, but they have the virtue of being far more attainable. Its also refreshing whenever a Democrat acknowledges that rising costs in any area arent sustainable.
Sundays debate also saw the first significant embrace of President Obamas agenda by Clinton. That was a smart move. Obamas job approval ratings among Democrats average 80 percent, and Clinton would be wise to tap into the loyalty the president still generates among the faithful. Distancing herself from Obama would not be enough to endear Clinton to Republicans and, in such a polarized atmosphere, would cost her some Democrats, particularly in minority communities.
She beat the democratic socialist to the punch in Sundays debate when she raised the lead-tainted water crisis in Flint, Mich., where thousands of children may face permanent brain damage from a misguided attempt to cut costs.
No one candidate, on either side, will have all of the answers. Evolution on positions is to be expected and even demanded. Ideological warriors may have some appeal early on, but its hard to govern from the edge.
http://www.startribune.com/sanders-promises-more-than-he-could-deliver-thankfully/365700121/
riversedge
(70,285 posts)snoringvoter
(178 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,018 posts)when talking about projects with scientists and others in the company - if you aim for the stars, you may hit the moon.
I've seen enough of using modest compromises for a START of ventures. The only thing one ends up with is little or no improvement - or worse.
question everything
(47,521 posts)Yes, politics is the art of compromise but this is not what many Bernie supporters with.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,018 posts)approach is critical now. We've been compromised to death for several decades now. It is time to stop and drive real meaningful change.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)In his zeal to right wrongs, his proposals should they ever come to pass likely would bankrupt the American economy and put businesses at too severe a disadvantage in a global marketplace.
Can't stray to far from the center right, oh no! The abyss lurks on the left!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Think of the downtrodden masses in Europe under the iron boot of (EEEK!!) Socialism!! Where it is proven that it can't work...oh..wait.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,829 posts)Their editorial page has become a sewer of GOP talking points, and worse: They still run the horrible bigoted opinions of the execrable Kathleen Kersten. It used to be a pretty good newspaper but ever since Glen Taylor bought it, it's good only for the comics, the crosswords, and wrapping more garbage. Billionaire Glen Taylor is a former Republican state senator who owns the Timberwolves basketball team - so you know where his bread is is buttered. There's no chance in Hell that his rag would say something significantly positive about Sanders.