Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 08:23 PM Aug 2014

So let me get something straight re: homophobia

as someone who has lived squarely in 2 letters of the LGBT rainbow, I am pretty fucking certain I know what homophobia is, and what homophobia (or, more accurately, homophobiC) isn't.

And just because some straight, white, Christian, male wants to say something is "homophobic" doesn't actually mean that it is, actually, homophobic. It may be a homophobic statement. Or it may be an innocuous statement that said straight, white, Christian, male ALERTS as being homophobic knowing that a jury is 1) very likely to hide something LABELED as homophobic (even if they don't think it is) because it's better to be safe and hide than not hide and be seen as a bigot or 2) TL;DR. Alerter says homophobic, okay, whatever, I have wanking to do.

referring to someone as "a baby" isn't homophobic. No matter how badly you want it to be a homophobic statement, it isn't. It may or may not be a personal attack. It may or may not be a not so nice thing to say. But it is not a gay slur. It is not an attack on someone's sexuality or gender identity.

Referring to someone as being "a worm" or referring to "a worm" is not a homophobic slur. It may or may not be a personal attack. It may or may not be a nice thing to say to someone. But it is not a gay slur. It is not an attack on someone's sexuality or gender identity.

But let me tell you what *IS* an attack on same sex marriage:

Referring to same-sex marriage as being the same as wanting to marry a bicycle. Or a vole. Or a dead grandmother.

That's a nasty slur. That's an attack on those who are fighting for the right of gender and marriage equality.

Despite all of the wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair from those who are so concerned, so very very concerned about HOMOPHOBIA and BIGOTRY in a supposed safe haven for all, not A SINGLE ONE of the people so very very concerned said ONE FUCKING WORD about this tripe that was posted (and thankfully hidden by a jury)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218122885#post112


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218122885#post181


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218122885#post176



The only people who called out THAT blatant homophobic, bigoted shit were ATHEISTS and ATHEIST SYMPATHIZERS.

Hell, one of the biggest screamers of HOMOPHOBIAOMGWTFLOLBBQ in the safe-haven was PRESENT IN THE THREAD and said nothing. Not a word. Not one single admonition of "omg dude seriously that's a fucked up thing to say. and say again. and keep saying."
----

So when I see posters who are good people, honest people, loving people who haven't a homophobic bone in their body be accused of being bigots by the same people who sat on their hands and said NOTHING about real hate...It gives me pause and makes me think "gee. I think you're full of shit with your alert."

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So let me get something straight re: homophobia (Original Post) Heddi Aug 2014 OP
Well, heddi, you can't both be right and the chances are that you're both wrong. NYC_SKP Aug 2014 #1
Hi. This is a safe haven Heddi Aug 2014 #4
Yes but if you quote NDT then you win the internets. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #5
Hey, do you have authority to award the internets? n/t onager Aug 2014 #7
I don't see where what I posted is in violation of the SOP, here's the SOP: NYC_SKP Aug 2014 #6
I really think that the point went completely over your head. But thanks for playing. (nt) mr blur Aug 2014 #18
Why are chances that both are wrong? Goblinmonger Aug 2014 #11
I don't think the the poster is a homophobe, I don't think the passages are intended to be so. NYC_SKP Aug 2014 #12
The fact that you're serious is very disturbing Heddi Aug 2014 #13
That was my reaction reading the offending posts... NeoGreen Aug 2014 #14
As is the comment further up in that thread comparing contraception to rubbers (nt) LostOne4Ever Aug 2014 #17
I notice a distinct lack of an explanation from Heddi Aug 2014 #19
You can be certain that this will be alerted on. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #2
For now, it's on the Greatest page. AtheistCrusader Aug 2014 #16
Hey, I got accused (as a supposed joke) of possibly groping my clients... AlbertCat Aug 2014 #3
off topic - ish Goblinmonger Aug 2014 #9
And even stupider, the worm ref Rainforestgoddess Aug 2014 #8
I love you. Goblinmonger Aug 2014 #10
That whole thread drove me nuts. AtheistCrusader Aug 2014 #15
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Well, heddi, you can't both be right and the chances are that you're both wrong.
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 08:49 PM
Aug 2014

Any time scientists disagree, it's because we have insufficient data. Then we can agree on what kind of data to get; we get the data; and the data solves the problem. Either I'm right, or you're right, or we're both wrong. And we move on. That kind of conflict resolution does not exist in politics or religion.

-- Neil DeGrasse Tyson


Heddi

(18,312 posts)
4. Hi. This is a safe haven
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 09:01 PM
Aug 2014

Please respect it. I think I can say that the members who post here are not really looking for someone to excuse openly bigoted and homophobic statements. If you think that comparing gay marriage to marrying a bicycle or a vole is a-ok, then I really have no interest in your shallow proclamations of what is right and what is wrong.

Thanks

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
6. I don't see where what I posted is in violation of the SOP, here's the SOP:
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 09:10 PM
Aug 2014

First, friend, I didn't say shit about supporting any statements made and included in your OP, I mean, really, screen caps and all, very odd.

I simply posted a position cited by a luminary, well respected by frequenters of this group.

Save haven doesn't mean safe for Heddi. It means safe for all who wish to discuss without threat. If you feel threatened by my response, I apologize.

Statement of Purpose

A place where atheists and agnostics can engage in frank discussions about the effects of religion on politics, free of debate about the existence of a deity or deities.


I don't see how posting a quote by Neil DeGrasse Tyson about the reality that science is different from political and religious discourse is a violation.

If anything, it FULLY supports the SOP.

In case you're thinking of alerting, please watch this Bill Moyers interview first: http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-neil-degrasse-tyson-on-science-religion-and-the-universe/

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
11. Why are chances that both are wrong?
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 09:45 PM
Aug 2014

Do you think those posts in the screen shots are homophobic or not?

We can go to the other posts in question after you answer that one.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
12. I don't think the the poster is a homophobe, I don't think the passages are intended to be so.
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:00 PM
Aug 2014

In any event, I neither reject nor accept these passages, as I wasn't there and I'm not prepared or willing to become involved in that thread and it's context.

Generally, the passages are homophobic, taken out of context.

But this is the Atheists and Agnostics Group, and I only stand by the observation that I made, using Tyson as a vehicle, that suggests that science is a different animal from politics and religion.

Now if you really want to know why "both are wrong" (and I wrote that the chances are that both are wrong), then watch this, Okay?

#t=13



Heddi

(18,312 posts)
13. The fact that you're serious is very disturbing
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:16 PM
Aug 2014

You know who else, aside for our vole-loving friend quoted above, equates same-sex marriage with human-animal marriage? Right wing homophobes. Using the exact same arguments. So please tell me why dear old DU'er gets a pass when right-wing hate-mongers don't. Please tell me in what universe is comparing gay marriage to marrying a fucking BICYCLE ever okay? And since we're being so mean and taking such comments out of context, please do provide the correct context where such statements would *ever* be acceptable outside of a fucking Sarah Palin convention. Please. Do explain to my feeble mind how comparing to adults in a same-sex marriage is remotely similar to a man marrying a goddamned bicycle.

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)
14. That was my reaction reading the offending posts...
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:36 PM
Aug 2014

...how is that not something a troll from the red liberal-hating wasteland would post?

It is almost a verbatim right wing talking point.

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
19. I notice a distinct lack of an explanation from
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 11:09 AM
Aug 2014

The poster who saw nothing wrong with those comments. 'You may both be right' 'those comments were taken out of context' but no context provided as to how they'd be okay.

Of course, the last thing I need is a straight male telling me, a bisexual woman, what is and isn't homophobic. Seems kinda 'straight-splaining' to me. But what do I know? I'm just a dumb gay woman who doesn't understand the intricacies of complicated things. I need a straight white male to explain it to me like I was dumb. Which apparently I am.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
2. You can be certain that this will be alerted on.
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 08:55 PM
Aug 2014

And if you are lucky four people will go TL;DR whatever hide. 'cause that's the way DU rolls now. There is no meta to shame the bad jurors. There is no host forum to openly discuss crap. And discuss it within a safe haven or a general forum and people will be looking for ways to have the ban hammer drop on you or the unplanned vacation take place. Alerting has become ever so much more rewarding.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
3. Hey, I got accused (as a supposed joke) of possibly groping my clients...
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 08:57 PM
Aug 2014

.... when I take their inseam measurement.


When I pointed out that this was homophobic ( in a thread about homophobia no less).... and then said I'm not so ridiculous as to alert on it because no one cared what the homophobe says anyway....

...it was MY post that was hidden.... because the "you grope your clients" guy got all offended! No doubt by the thought of his righteous babble being annoyed. (but he can pretend it was because I called him a homophobe.)

Amazing isn't it?


Alerting and hiding posts is just so dumb.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
9. off topic - ish
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 09:43 PM
Aug 2014

Makes new think of the Friends episode when Ross gets groped by Joey's tailor measuring his inseam. "Chandler, tell him that's how you measure an inseam." "Yeah. In prison. "

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
15. That whole thread drove me nuts.
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 01:54 AM
Aug 2014

I had to stop posting at one point, or I was going to earn a hide.

Like really, a vole? You're going to compare this issue to that? Really? I wonder where one gets that sort of idea from... I wonder...

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»So let me get something s...