Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumSo let me get something straight re: homophobia
as someone who has lived squarely in 2 letters of the LGBT rainbow, I am pretty fucking certain I know what homophobia is, and what homophobia (or, more accurately, homophobiC) isn't.
And just because some straight, white, Christian, male wants to say something is "homophobic" doesn't actually mean that it is, actually, homophobic. It may be a homophobic statement. Or it may be an innocuous statement that said straight, white, Christian, male ALERTS as being homophobic knowing that a jury is 1) very likely to hide something LABELED as homophobic (even if they don't think it is) because it's better to be safe and hide than not hide and be seen as a bigot or 2) TL;DR. Alerter says homophobic, okay, whatever, I have wanking to do.
referring to someone as "a baby" isn't homophobic. No matter how badly you want it to be a homophobic statement, it isn't. It may or may not be a personal attack. It may or may not be a not so nice thing to say. But it is not a gay slur. It is not an attack on someone's sexuality or gender identity.
Referring to someone as being "a worm" or referring to "a worm" is not a homophobic slur. It may or may not be a personal attack. It may or may not be a nice thing to say to someone. But it is not a gay slur. It is not an attack on someone's sexuality or gender identity.
But let me tell you what *IS* an attack on same sex marriage:
Referring to same-sex marriage as being the same as wanting to marry a bicycle. Or a vole. Or a dead grandmother.
That's a nasty slur. That's an attack on those who are fighting for the right of gender and marriage equality.
Despite all of the wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair from those who are so concerned, so very very concerned about HOMOPHOBIA and BIGOTRY in a supposed safe haven for all, not A SINGLE ONE of the people so very very concerned said ONE FUCKING WORD about this tripe that was posted (and thankfully hidden by a jury)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218122885#post112
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218122885#post181
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218122885#post176
The only people who called out THAT blatant homophobic, bigoted shit were ATHEISTS and ATHEIST SYMPATHIZERS.
Hell, one of the biggest screamers of HOMOPHOBIAOMGWTFLOLBBQ in the safe-haven was PRESENT IN THE THREAD and said nothing. Not a word. Not one single admonition of "omg dude seriously that's a fucked up thing to say. and say again. and keep saying."
----
So when I see posters who are good people, honest people, loving people who haven't a homophobic bone in their body be accused of being bigots by the same people who sat on their hands and said NOTHING about real hate...It gives me pause and makes me think "gee. I think you're full of shit with your alert."
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Any time scientists disagree, it's because we have insufficient data. Then we can agree on what kind of data to get; we get the data; and the data solves the problem. Either I'm right, or you're right, or we're both wrong. And we move on. That kind of conflict resolution does not exist in politics or religion.
-- Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Heddi
(18,312 posts)Please respect it. I think I can say that the members who post here are not really looking for someone to excuse openly bigoted and homophobic statements. If you think that comparing gay marriage to marrying a bicycle or a vole is a-ok, then I really have no interest in your shallow proclamations of what is right and what is wrong.
Thanks
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)onager
(9,356 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)First, friend, I didn't say shit about supporting any statements made and included in your OP, I mean, really, screen caps and all, very odd.
I simply posted a position cited by a luminary, well respected by frequenters of this group.
Save haven doesn't mean safe for Heddi. It means safe for all who wish to discuss without threat. If you feel threatened by my response, I apologize.
A place where atheists and agnostics can engage in frank discussions about the effects of religion on politics, free of debate about the existence of a deity or deities.
I don't see how posting a quote by Neil DeGrasse Tyson about the reality that science is different from political and religious discourse is a violation.
If anything, it FULLY supports the SOP.
In case you're thinking of alerting, please watch this Bill Moyers interview first: http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-neil-degrasse-tyson-on-science-religion-and-the-universe/
mr blur
(7,753 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Do you think those posts in the screen shots are homophobic or not?
We can go to the other posts in question after you answer that one.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)In any event, I neither reject nor accept these passages, as I wasn't there and I'm not prepared or willing to become involved in that thread and it's context.
Generally, the passages are homophobic, taken out of context.
But this is the Atheists and Agnostics Group, and I only stand by the observation that I made, using Tyson as a vehicle, that suggests that science is a different animal from politics and religion.
Now if you really want to know why "both are wrong" (and I wrote that the chances are that both are wrong), then watch this, Okay?
Heddi
(18,312 posts)You know who else, aside for our vole-loving friend quoted above, equates same-sex marriage with human-animal marriage? Right wing homophobes. Using the exact same arguments. So please tell me why dear old DU'er gets a pass when right-wing hate-mongers don't. Please tell me in what universe is comparing gay marriage to marrying a fucking BICYCLE ever okay? And since we're being so mean and taking such comments out of context, please do provide the correct context where such statements would *ever* be acceptable outside of a fucking Sarah Palin convention. Please. Do explain to my feeble mind how comparing to adults in a same-sex marriage is remotely similar to a man marrying a goddamned bicycle.
NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)...how is that not something a troll from the red liberal-hating wasteland would post?
It is almost a verbatim right wing talking point.
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)Heddi
(18,312 posts)The poster who saw nothing wrong with those comments. 'You may both be right' 'those comments were taken out of context' but no context provided as to how they'd be okay.
Of course, the last thing I need is a straight male telling me, a bisexual woman, what is and isn't homophobic. Seems kinda 'straight-splaining' to me. But what do I know? I'm just a dumb gay woman who doesn't understand the intricacies of complicated things. I need a straight white male to explain it to me like I was dumb. Which apparently I am.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)And if you are lucky four people will go TL;DR whatever hide. 'cause that's the way DU rolls now. There is no meta to shame the bad jurors. There is no host forum to openly discuss crap. And discuss it within a safe haven or a general forum and people will be looking for ways to have the ban hammer drop on you or the unplanned vacation take place. Alerting has become ever so much more rewarding.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Where I think it belongs, and I hope a jury agrees.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts).... when I take their inseam measurement.
When I pointed out that this was homophobic ( in a thread about homophobia no less).... and then said I'm not so ridiculous as to alert on it because no one cared what the homophobe says anyway....
...it was MY post that was hidden.... because the "you grope your clients" guy got all offended! No doubt by the thought of his righteous babble being annoyed. (but he can pretend it was because I called him a homophobe.)
Amazing isn't it?
Alerting and hiding posts is just so dumb.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Makes new think of the Friends episode when Ross gets groped by Joey's tailor measuring his inseam. "Chandler, tell him that's how you measure an inseam." "Yeah. In prison. "
Rainforestgoddess
(436 posts)Was clearly a fishing bait analogy
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Thank you.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I had to stop posting at one point, or I was going to earn a hide.
Like really, a vole? You're going to compare this issue to that? Really? I wonder where one gets that sort of idea from... I wonder...