Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(14,082 posts)
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 01:43 PM Aug 2012

Big Bang Was Actually a Phase Change, New Theory Says

?1345583667

From space.com ( http://www.space.com/17217-big-bang-phase-change-theory.html? ) :

How did the universe begin? The Big Bang is traditionally envisioned as the moment when an infinitely dense bundle of energy suddenly burst outward, expanding in three spatial directions and gradually cooling down as it did so.

Now, a team of physicists says the Big Bang should be modeled as a phase change: the moment when an amorphous, formless universe analogous to liquid water cooled and suddenly crystallized to form four-dimensional space-time, analogous to ice.

...


“Think of the early universe as being like a liquid,” Quach said in a statement. “Then as the universe cools, it ‘crystallises’ into the three spatial and one time dimension that we see today. Theorized this way, as the universe cools, we would expect that cracks should form, similar to the way cracks are formed when water freezes into ice.”

...


The notion that space and time are emergent properties that suddenly materialized out of an amorphous state was first put forth by physicists at Canada’s Perimeter Institute in 2006. Called “quantum graphity,” the theory holds that the four-dimensional geometry of space-time discovered by Albert Einstein is not fundamental; instead, space-time is more like a lattice constructed of discrete space-time building blocks, just like matter looks continuous, but is actually made of building blocks called atoms.

...
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big Bang Was Actually a Phase Change, New Theory Says (Original Post) Jim__ Aug 2012 OP
Gotta love the word play: "quantum graphity" longship Aug 2012 #1
That makes a great deal more sense to me Warpy Aug 2012 #2
thank you for this. Gives new meaning to being in the crack. roguevalley Aug 2012 #3
Does it stretch? FiveGoodMen Aug 2012 #4
Here's a link to the actual paper: Jim__ Aug 2012 #5
If I read this correctly DetlefK Aug 2012 #8
The paper doesn't refer to properties like expansion, metric and curvature. DetlefK Aug 2012 #9
Spam deleted by LeftishBrit (MIR Team) kraj8995 Aug 2012 #6
Is what you wrote in the message text your opinion? n/t xocet Aug 2012 #7
How does something *change* to create time before there is time? Silent3 Aug 2012 #10

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. Gotta love the word play: "quantum graphity"
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 02:26 PM
Aug 2012

I also like this idea. It is elegant and simple. It is esthetically pleasing to me. I wish these guys luck.

A state change makes sense because in the Big Bang model incorporated with the standard model the universe goes through several state changes when the four force fields separate from a unified field. This is termed spontaneous symmetry breaking and has been the model for multiple physics Nobel prizes going back to the 70's.

Good show. Maybe Canada gets a future Nobel.

Going to keep an eye on this.

on edit: R&K

Warpy

(111,319 posts)
2. That makes a great deal more sense to me
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 02:52 PM
Aug 2012

than stuffing the universe into one point, blowing it up, and then having it expand in perpetuity.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
4. Does it stretch?
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 08:41 PM
Aug 2012

If I'm reading this right, it suggests that the expansion of space is the result of the crystal structure continually building on itself.

However, most of the current thinking seems to suggest that space is stretching (i.e. the EXISTING parts are moving away from each other).

Does this new idea account for that? Or does it DIScount that?

Jim__

(14,082 posts)
5. Here's a link to the actual paper:
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:30 PM
Aug 2012
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5367v2.pdf

But I'm not sure that will actually answer your question. Here's a review that's critical of the press releases:

...

The title of the paper is neutral and to the point: "Domain structures in quantum graphity." Nowhere in the paper do the four authors mention overthrowing the Big Bang model; the paper's purpose and methodology are clear. Quantum graphity is a theory motivated by condensed matter physics (the science of materials at high densities), in which the structure of space-time emerges from a lattice-like structure in the very early Universe.

...


I hope that helps.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
8. If I read this correctly
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 07:18 AM
Aug 2012

They start with points ("vertices&quot in an environment with unspecified dimensions. A vertex represents the presence of a particle of matter, with matter-related degrees of freedom being possible within a vertex. A vertex is not the same as a position, as of yet, no distances/dimensions/metric have been defined.

Vertices are connected by an "edge", which is treated as a quantum degree of freedom, as a superposition of |0> and |1>.

Next he constructs a Hilbert-space from those edge-states. A group state containing all of the edges contains the info, how all of the vertices are interconnected.

The chaotic state of the early universe is represented by a "complete graph", which means, everything is connected to everything.

Next he uses an Hamiltonian-operator to enforce attributes on the edges. An important attribute is locality, which is represented by a circular loop of edges. He also introduces a punitive potential to ensure that vertices close to each other connect preferably.

The balance between the need to form loops and the need to stay local has a stable state in an energy-minimum. The geometrical representation is a honeycomb lattice. (This is not 2D! The dimensionality of the space the edges represent isn't restricted so far!)


This is a summary of pages 1-3. 8 more pages to go.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
9. The paper doesn't refer to properties like expansion, metric and curvature.
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 07:55 AM
Aug 2012

It's just about the process, how space (order) came from non-space (chaos).

Silent3

(15,254 posts)
10. How does something *change* to create time before there is time?
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 08:42 AM
Aug 2012

When I read stories like this, I have to wonder how much is getting lost in translation going from the complex mathematics of theoretical physics to the wording of popularized science, and how much scientists themselves struggle with getting their minds outside of the framework of time in which human thought processes are so deeply embedded.

Going by the suspect wording of this story, you need to imagine a "time outside of time" in which there is a somehow a progression of events before time exists, a progression much like we experience within the time of our daily lives, from a condition before time exists to a condition when time exists. The word "change" itself is a time-based concept.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Big Bang Was Actually a P...