Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,274 posts)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:31 PM Jul 2012

Graphene transistors in high-performance demonstration (BBC)

By Jason Palmer
Science and technology reporter, BBC News

The hope for the "miracle material" graphene to fulfil its promise in electronics has received a boost - by changing the recipe when cooking it.

Graphene, one-atom-thick sheets of carbon, can carry electric charges far faster than currently used materials.

But it has proven difficult to make it behave as a semiconductor like silicon, or to attach "contacts" to the sheets.

A study in Nature Communications solves those problems by cooking up graphene from a material called silicon carbide.
***
more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18868848
original paper: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v3/n7/full/ncomms1955.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Graphene transistors in high-performance demonstration (BBC) (Original Post) eppur_se_muova Jul 2012 OP
can someone clear this statement up for me? AlecBGreen Jul 2012 #1
"The speed of light" as popularly understood is the speed of light in a vacuum Posteritatis Jul 2012 #3
understood, thanks AlecBGreen Jul 2012 #4
Do a Google search on 'Graphene'! You'll get some interesting results! LongTomH Jul 2012 #2

AlecBGreen

(3,874 posts)
1. can someone clear this statement up for me?
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:04 PM
Jul 2012

"Graphene, one-atom-thick sheets of carbon, can carry electric charges far faster than currently used materials."

I thought all conductors allow electricity to move through it at the speed of light. I.e. a current moving though a copper rod or an iron rod or a graphene rod would all move at the same rate. Am I wrong in this thinking or am I misreading the statement (or both?)? Gracias!

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
3. "The speed of light" as popularly understood is the speed of light in a vacuum
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 02:04 AM
Jul 2012

That one is The Limit, but the speed of light in any given substance is different.

As with sound, it can vary depending on what it's passing through. Light travels more slowly through air than through vacuum, more slowly through water than through air, and so on. It's still moving preposterously fast in any of those media, but the speed differences can actually start to add up with very high-speed computing. (The limits of the speed of light are already a concern in a lot of supercomputers.)

So c, the speed of light in vacuum, cannot, as far as we know, be exceeded, but the light itself is slowed down when it passes through something. The speed of light in water's about three quarters of c, which is still 225,000 kilometers per second.

(For extra fun, you can exceed local lightspeed by sending something through, say, water at 0.9c. The effects of that are what causes the blue glow you see in nuclear reactors.)

AlecBGreen

(3,874 posts)
4. understood, thanks
Wed Jul 25, 2012, 02:25 PM
Jul 2012

after i read your explanation im kind of kicking myself. Duh. Light moves though air and water @ different speeds which accounts for things being underwater to appear "in a different place"

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Graphene transistors in h...