Science
Related: About this forumSteel Flows in the United States.
The paper I'll discuss in this brief post is this one: Mapping the Annual Flow of Steel in the United States (Yongxian Zhu, Kyle Syndergaard and Daniel R. Cooper, Environ. Sci. Technol.2019, 53, 19, 11260-11268)
The production of steel is coal dependent, and all the hand waving and fantasies in the world about the death of coal will not change this fact in the immediate future. Personally I believe that it is technologically feasible to displace coal in steel making, but not using steel intensive industries like, say, the wind industry, although the effort to make it significant - which will fail because of the simple laws of physics - will uselessly consume a lot of steel for no good purpose.
From the paper's introduction, verifying the fact of the GHG intensity of steel:
Realization that steel production must decrease if emission targets are to be achieved has helped lead to new research areas under the banners of material efficiency(5) and circular economy,(6) both aimed at reducing emission-intensive material production. Researchers in these new areas require a detailed material map in order to identify opportunities.
Unlike in the developing world, U.S. per capita steel stocks plateaued around 1980. The stock saturation level has been estimated at 9.114.3 t/capita.(7?9) Per capita stocks are expected to saturate in much of the developing world to a level similar to those in the U.S. by the late 21st century.(10,11) Therefore, the derived U.S. consumption pattern may represent a population-scaled surrogate model of the future global state.
I'll just cut to two of the informative graphics, one of which is a Sankey diagram of US steel flows, which, to utilize, one may need to utilize expanded views and rotation tools:
The caption:
The caption:
It is notable that the United States throws away more steel than it produces from pig iron and that amount of steel consumed for transportation is double that of the rest of the world, even if we love to declare ourselves "green" in contrast to say, China:
In a closed carbon cycle world, which I freely admit would be energy intensive, one can imagine the separation of impurities like copper might be conceivable.
Interesting paper, I think.
I trust you're having a wonderful afternoon.
underpants
(182,804 posts)Bookmarking to read later.