Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:52 AM Apr 2016

Tickling Apes

By FRANS de WAAL

TICKLING a juvenile chimpanzee is a lot like tickling a child. The ape has the same sensitive spots: under the armpits, on the side, in the belly. He opens his mouth wide, lips relaxed, panting audibly in the same “huh-huh-huh” rhythm of inhalation and exhalation as human laughter. The similarity makes it hard not to giggle yourself.

The ape also shows the same ambivalence as a child. He pushes your tickling fingers away and tries to escape, but as soon as you stop he comes back for more, putting his belly right in front of you. At this point, you need only to point to a tickling spot, not even touching it, and he will throw another fit of laughter.

Laughter? Now wait a minute! A real scientist should avoid any and all anthropomorphism, which is why hard-nosed colleagues often ask us to change our terminology. Why not call the ape’s reaction something neutral, like, say, vocalized panting? That way we avoid confusion between the human and the animal.

The term anthropomorphism, which means “human form,” comes from the Greek philosopher Xenophanes, who protested in the fifth century B.C. against Homer’s poetry because it described the gods as though they looked human. Xenophanes mocked this assumption, reportedly saying that if horses had hands they would “draw their gods like horses.” Nowadays the term has a broader meaning. It is typically used to censure the attribution of humanlike traits and experiences to other species. Animals don’t have “sex,” but engage in breeding behavior. They don’t have “friends,” but favorite affiliation partners.

more

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/opinion/sunday/what-i-learned-from-tickling-apes.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region&region=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tickling Apes (Original Post) n2doc Apr 2016 OP
I read this in Sunday mornings NYT science section. broiles Apr 2016 #1
Skinner said we shouldn't anthropomorphise ourselves: soon enough psychology MisterP Apr 2016 #2

broiles

(1,367 posts)
1. I read this in Sunday mornings NYT science section.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:18 PM
Apr 2016

As an experimental Psychologist I was taught never to anthropomorphize. But that seem to deny our shared history. This seems to be a more sensible approach.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
2. Skinner said we shouldn't anthropomorphise ourselves: soon enough psychology
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 02:45 PM
Apr 2016

would get rid of any such Dark-Age notions as free will or thought

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Tickling Apes