Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 08:55 AM Nov 2015

Journal of Neuroscience: Mindfulness Meditation Decreases Pain more than placebo

Summary of the findings:

Recent findings have demonstrated that mindfulness meditation significantly reduces pain. Given that the “gold standard” for evaluating the efficacy of behavioral interventions is based on appropriate placebo comparisons, it is imperative that we establish whether there is an effect supporting meditation-related pain relief above and beyond the effects of placebo.

Here, we provide novel evidence demonstrating that mindfulness meditation produces greater pain relief and employs distinct neural mechanisms than placebo cream and sham mindfulness meditation. Specifically, mindfulness meditation-induced pain relief activated higher-order brain regions, including the orbitofrontal and cingulate cortices. In contrast, placebo analgesia was associated with decreased pain-related brain activation.

These findings demonstrate that mindfulness meditation reduces pain through unique mechanisms and may foster greater acceptance of meditation as an adjunct pain therapy.

http://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/46/15307.short

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Journal of Neuroscience: Mindfulness Meditation Decreases Pain more than placebo (Original Post) ellenrr Nov 2015 OP
I can't get to the article at the link, but I'd be curious to know enough Nov 2015 #1
It's a very mainstream journal greymattermom Nov 2015 #2
As I said in my question, I was asking a serious question, not doubting the science or the Journal enough Nov 2015 #7
That would be my immediate question, too. longship Nov 2015 #3
Mindfulness training is used by major corporations such as Google and Apple Ichingcarpenter Nov 2015 #4
I do not assume that it is woo. That is why I'm wondering about the question of enough Nov 2015 #8
Of course Myrth Nov 2015 #5
C.G. Jung Ichingcarpenter Nov 2015 #6
Excellent quotes. Duppers Nov 2015 #9
Even 'the placebo effect' is a form of mindfulness in a way Ichingcarpenter Nov 2015 #10
So the conclusion is that Mindfulness Meditation works better for pain than doing nothing? Thor_MN Dec 2015 #11
no it works better than the placebo effect Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #12
The placebo IS doing nothing. The placebo effect is based on faith that something is being done. Thor_MN Dec 2015 #13
The placebo is NOT "doing nothing" bananas Dec 2015 #14
The placebo is inert, therefore doing nothing. Thor_MN Dec 2015 #15
That's not correct. bananas Dec 2015 #17
You are comingling the term "Placebo" with the term "Placebo Effect". Thor_MN Dec 2015 #18
You're comingling "no treatment" with "placebo". bananas Dec 2015 #19
The active placebo that you seem to not understand does nothing for the condition being studied. Thor_MN Dec 2015 #20
The reason pain control techniques were developed by the meditative traditions bananas Dec 2015 #16

enough

(13,259 posts)
1. I can't get to the article at the link, but I'd be curious to know
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 09:07 AM
Nov 2015

how they define the difference between mindfulness meditation and sham mindfulness meditation.

This sounds like snark, but I don't mean it that way. In the context of the experiment, it would be interesting to know what were the characteristics of the "real" mediation that the sham meditation did not have.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
2. It's a very mainstream journal
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 09:15 AM
Nov 2015

and very hard to get anything published there. I'm sure the science is solid and can get the pdf if anyone want to read it.

enough

(13,259 posts)
7. As I said in my question, I was asking a serious question, not doubting the science or the Journal
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 08:45 PM
Nov 2015

in which it was published. It is exactly because I assume the science is solid that I am asking my question. The fact that I assume the science is solid is what makes me interested in the question.

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. That would be my immediate question, too.
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 09:38 AM
Nov 2015

I think it is wise to wait for peer review on this one.


Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
4. Mindfulness training is used by major corporations such as Google and Apple
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 09:48 AM
Nov 2015

Believe it or not Monsanto started using it first but then people started quitting Monsanto so they tossed the program

I've posted many stories on this on DU but search for yourself

TM has been used in San Francisco's toughest school with great results which is mindfulness training

I use mindfullness for pain and depression it works

The school ....

http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2015/nov/24/san-franciscos-toughest-schools-transformed-meditation

Its not woo.....

enough

(13,259 posts)
8. I do not assume that it is woo. That is why I'm wondering about the question of
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 08:48 PM
Nov 2015

exactly how they designed the difference between the treatment and the placebo. If I thought it was woo, I would not be interested in that question.

I regularly use meditation for pain control. So regularly that I barely even think about it.

Myrth

(16 posts)
5. Of course
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 12:25 PM
Nov 2015

People who practice meditation knew this already. But it is nice to be scientifically validated. Insurance companies should pay for instruction in meditation techniques. It could save considerable money in reduced pain medication prescriptions and subsequent addiction treatment.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
6. C.G. Jung
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 12:38 PM
Nov 2015

“Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate.”
― C.G. Jung

. Mindfulness meditation - no matter how described - is only realized through a first person investigation.

"You will not be punished for your anger,
you will be punished BY your anger."

Buddha

Mindfulness training, like I said, major corporations have spent millions on it.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
10. Even 'the placebo effect' is a form of mindfulness in a way
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 06:34 AM
Nov 2015

Since it is a real phenomena which the mind manifests. in controlled studies.




Harvard Medical School
Putting the placebo effect to work

http://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/putting-the-placebo-effect-to-work

I'm glad that mindfulness training has been shownsuperior to the placebo effect in this scientific study

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
12. no it works better than the placebo effect
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 03:56 PM
Dec 2015

the placebo effect may work in cases such as
Depression
Pain
Sleep disorders
Irritable bowel syndrome
Menopause


The fact that the placebo effect is tied to expectations doesn't make it imaginary or fake. Some studies show that there are actual physical changes that occur with the placebo effect. For instance, some studies have documented an increase in the body's production of endorphins, one of the body's natural pain relievers.

http://www.webmd.com/pain-management/what-is-the-placebo-effect?page=2

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
13. The placebo IS doing nothing. The placebo effect is based on faith that something is being done.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 04:04 PM
Dec 2015

The point being that study did not compare to any actual pain medications, so it does "something" but that something can not be compared to any medications.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
14. The placebo is NOT "doing nothing"
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 10:44 PM
Dec 2015

There are many studies which use both no treatment and placebo controls.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
15. The placebo is inert, therefore doing nothing.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:00 PM
Dec 2015

The placebo effect is the subject believing something is being done.

It is inarguable the placebo is doing nothing, it is precisely chosen to have no effect.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
17. That's not correct.
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 10:32 AM
Dec 2015

First, not all placebos are inert - for example, "active placebos" contain substances which cause side effects. In some drug trials, active placebos are chosen intentionally for their effects, because drug effects can unblind the test. Active placebos tend to be more effective than inert placebos.

Second, placebos work even if the patient is told it's just a placebo - the placebo effect occurs even if the patient knows "nothing is being done".

The placebo effect is NOT "the subject believing something is being done."

The term "placebo" is from Latin, it means "to please", and the "placebo effect" was given that name because the patient seems to be unconsciously responding to the doctors expectations "to please" the doctor.

This works both ways - if the patient is given negative expectations, the patients condition may worsen in response - this is sometimes called the nocebo effect, although it is still a placebo effect.

It's a real effect, and even affects people who don't believe it such as yourself.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
18. You are comingling the term "Placebo" with the term "Placebo Effect".
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 08:27 PM
Dec 2015

The terms are not interchangeable and you don't seem to know what you are talking about.

Please cite what "active placebos" were used in the OP study.

I'll wait...

bananas

(27,509 posts)
19. You're comingling "no treatment" with "placebo".
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 05:16 AM
Dec 2015

The terms are not interchangeable and you don't seem to know what you are talking about.

The placebo is given to measure and control for the placebo effect.

It is not the same as "no treatment" or "doing nothing".

The OP didn't include no treatment or active placebo groups.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
20. The active placebo that you seem to not understand does nothing for the condition being studied.
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 08:42 AM
Dec 2015

There are active ingredients TO FOOL the subject into thinking they did not get a placebo. However, the active ingredients DO NOTHING for the condition being studied, or it would not be a placebo.

By definition, a placebo does nothing for the condition being studied. The seemingly only thing that you say right, but don't understand is : "The placebo is given to measure and control for the placebo effect."

Going back to my original point, the study did not include an active pain medication, so while it can be said that Mindful Meditation is better than just meditation, or treatment that has no active ingredients (can you live with that as opposed to treatment that does nothing?), no conclusion can be draw how Mindful Meditation compares to any type of actual pain medication. For all we know from this study. The placebo effect could give a 1 on a scale of 1 to 100 for pain relief. Mindful Meditation could give a 2, while aspirin gives a 40 and opioids give an 80. Or it could be that Mindful Meditation gives a 50 and the drugs stay the same.

No way of telling because that wasn't studied and one should not take away the impression that rushing out to some quack peddling the latest fad in meditation is going to instantly cure their pain.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
16. The reason pain control techniques were developed by the meditative traditions
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:32 PM
Dec 2015

was so they could enter deeper meditative states - requiring hours, days, weeks - without being distracted by physical discomfort.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Journal of Neuroscience: ...