Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Thu Aug 13, 2015, 01:20 PM Aug 2015

Robot 'mother' builds babies that can evolve on their own

Scientists have created a ‘mother’ robot that can build babies out of mechanised blocks, and then create new ones that evolve from the previous generation.

The findings show that robots could be able to evolve on their own, in the same way that animals and humans have. Like biological evolution, the robots mother could look out for the best traits in her children, and then use those to improve the following generations of robots.

In five different experiments, robot set the mother — which looks like a big robotic arm — to work building generations of ten different children. They were built out of small plastic cubes with motors inside.


The experiments found that those baby robots passed down all of their best traits. The last generation of children could perform tasks twice as quickly as the first, according to the results posted in the journal PLOS One.

Each of the robots carries a “genome”, made up of different genes, like humans do. As the generations were built, they passed them down and they mutated and cross over, deleting and merging genes to choose the most effective.


http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/robot-mother-builds-babies-that-can-evolve-on-their-own-10453196.html



Picture of mother robot









I mean the mother robot in this story







8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robot 'mother' builds babies that can evolve on their own (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 OP
Next step - 3-D imprinting nt Xipe Totec Aug 2015 #1
And so it begins... Kip Humphrey Aug 2015 #2
How IBM's new 7nm chip busts Moore's Law, changes future of computing Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #3
I'm confused... Javaman Aug 2015 #4
Because that wouldn't help ignore that it isn't real evolution. Thor_MN Aug 2015 #7
Quite correct. nt Bonobo Aug 2015 #8
GORT! lastlib Aug 2015 #5
Bring on the cylons! progressoid Aug 2015 #6

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
3. How IBM's new 7nm chip busts Moore's Law, changes future of computing
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 09:40 AM
Aug 2015

If we were to think about electronic devices as molecules, the semiconductor would be the atom, and changes to these building blocks often have huge implications for the future of technology as a whole.

On Thursday, July 9, 2015, IBM Research announced the production of a 7nm node test chips with working transistors. IBM, Samsung, GlobalFoundries, and SUNY Polytechnic Institute's Colleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering (SUNY Poly CNSE) all participated in the development of the technology, which could enable up to 20 billion transistors on a chip the size of a human fingernail.


IBM processors built at 7nm will be four times more powerful with up to 20bn transistors squeezed onto a single chip

The last major chip breakthrough was in making 14nm transistors, and doubts were raised about whether silicon-based processors could get much smaller due to the physics of atom sizes and the microscopic scale.

A strand of DNA is 2.5nm wide.


http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/09/moores-law-new-chips-ibm-7nm




Javaman

(62,531 posts)
4. I'm confused...
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 11:57 AM
Aug 2015

if a robot mother can build babies, why then does she need to build more to create an "evolution" change?

why can't she just upgrade the babies?

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
7. Because that wouldn't help ignore that it isn't real evolution.
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 10:26 PM
Aug 2015

The "babies" can't grow up and become "mothers' that create "babies". This is no different than Version 2.0 or 1.1 being better or having more features than version 1.0

In all likelihood the first generation "babies" were disassembled to create the later "generations." But that doesn't fit trying to generate sensationalism by suggesting that "robots are evolving".

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Robot 'mother' builds bab...