Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:12 AM Dec 2014

Promising compound rapidly eliminates malaria parasite

An international research collaborative has determined that a promising anti-malarial compound tricks the immune system to rapidly destroy red blood cells infected with the malaria parasite but leave healthy cells unharmed. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital scientists led the study, which appears in the current online early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The compound, (+)-SJ733, was developed from a molecule identified in a previous St. Jude-led study that helped to jumpstart worldwide anti-malarial drug development efforts. Malaria is caused by a parasite spread through the bite of an infected mosquito. The disease remains a major health threat to more than half the world's population, particularly children. The World Health Organization estimates that in Africa a child dies of malaria every minute.

In this study, researchers determined that (+)-SJ733 uses a novel mechanism to kill the parasite by recruiting the immune system to eliminate malaria-infected red blood cells. In a mouse model of malaria, a single dose of (+)-SJ733 killed 80 percent of malaria parasites within 24 hours. After 48 hours the parasite was undetectable.

Planning has begun for safety trials of the compound in healthy adults.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/12/141205175027.htm

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Promising compound rapidly eliminates malaria parasite (Original Post) IDemo Dec 2014 OP
The article's editors need to edit better. postulater Dec 2014 #1
Yeah, noticed that and updated the source n/t IDemo Dec 2014 #2
Thanks, much better! postulater Dec 2014 #3

postulater

(5,075 posts)
1. The article's editors need to edit better.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:20 AM
Dec 2014

All it takes is for a human to read the final draft.

double 'was'
'trite' instead of 'tried'

Makes me wonder about the accuracy of the rest of the report.

Interesting idea though.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Promising compound rapidl...