Telescope made using a 3D printer captures incredible picture of the moon

[Judi Lynn]

Telescope made using a 3D printer captures incredible picture of the moon
Default author image
Monday 22 Sep 2014 11:21 am



A space telescope anyone can build for just £100 offers images that rival the output of models ten times the price.

There’s just one catch: to make it, you need a 3D printer, which costs a minimum of £400.

The plans for the PiKon telescope were drawn up by University of Sheffield researchers, who describe the gadget as a “game changer” after the researchers published the 3D model plans online for anyone to use.

The ‘brain’ of the telescope is a £25 Rasperry Pi computer, available to buy online, and other parts such as the lens and mirror are freely on sale, too.

The computer is so small it can be mounted directly in front of the mirror. It offers 160 times magnification – enough for clear pictures of the moon, galaxies, star clusters and a few planets.

More:
http://metro.co.uk/2014/09/22/telescope-made-using-a-3d-printer-captures-incredible-picture-of-the-moon-4877507/

[orpupilofnature57]

1. This 3-D stuff could be the ' Gutenberg Galaxy ' of the modern age !!!

[Baitball Blogger]

2. I can't wait until they make 3-D Printers Vending Machines.

They would be more popular than the melted souvenir ones:

[NYC_SKP]

3. I'm working on a 3D printer that prints 3D printers. :-)

An old saying among machinists is that a lathe is the only machine that can reproduce itself...

[Baitball Blogger]

4. Let's hear it for rudimentary lathes!

[PeoViejo]

14. Hear, Hear!!

Why spend a Month developing a program to make an item, when you can freehand it in a Day with old fashioned tools.

[Sirveri]

7. They actually already have plans for a 3d printed printer.

Though I think you still need to purchase metal structural rods (unless you have an $80k 3d metal printer like they're proto-typing at LLNL).

http://reprap.org/

[Electric Monk]

9. Well, there's also Von Neumann machines, designed back in the 1940s...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_universal_constructor

[PeoViejo]

15. One problem I can see with the evolutioary concept of Machines.

With Living creatures, the failures just die and rot away. Machines, on the other hand, would leave the Planet covered in useless Junk.

[eridani]

10. Really? Are you series?!?! Tell us more! n/t

[orpupilofnature57]

5. Got it .

https://www.google.com/search?q=3d+oreo+vending+machine&biw=1233&bih=731&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=3qAgVPXNO4K1ogTIsIBY&ved=0CD4QsAQ

[Baitball Blogger]

6. Ohhh....

No emoticon for salivation. What a shame.

[Sirveri]

8. 3d printing larger objects is too slow for that use.

So you could print a toy robot, however it would take about 4 hours and then you would need to submerge the platter in a vat full of lye for 10-20 minutes. This is assuming plastic as the medium, however you can also print with cement, and other things that tend to go faster and not require a platter to adhere to.

[padfun]

11. Star trek

We are getting closer and closer to having replicators. Right now we still need materials, but eventually it will just suck the shit from the air and make everything from nitrogen.

[marble falls]

12. Join the borg.

[N_E_1 for Tennis]

13. I want to print my perfect pet ...

Get your mind outta the gutter!

Dog....that doesn't poop!

[alfredo]

16. OK, here tis