Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 2506 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The difference is subtle (Original Post)
struggle4progress
Apr 2013
OP
This reminds me of a study of the difference between physicists and mathematicians...
DreamGypsy
Apr 2013
#3
Here it still is, in a 1991 philosopher's text on logic, long after it vanished
struggle4progress
Apr 2013
#9
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)1. Suddenly I understand Yoism!!!
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)2. !
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)3. This reminds me of a study of the difference between physicists and mathematicians...
A noted sociologist wanted to determine the difference between physicists and mathematicians, so he asked two of his colleagues of the respective disciplines at the University to participate in a series of experiments. Here are the results:
Experiment I.
Physicist: Subject enters a classroom and observes the instructions written on the blackboard: Boil water. Subject scans the room and notices a pan of water in the left front corner of the room and an electric hotplate in the front-middle of the room. Subject walks to the left corner and picks up pan, moves to the center of the room, places pan on hotplate, turns on hot plate, and waits for the water to boil. Subject turns off hotplate and exits room.
Mathemetician: Subject enters a classroom and observes the instructions written on the blackboard: Boil water. Subject scans the room and notices a pan of water in the left front corner of the room and an electric hotplate in the front-middle of the room. Subject walks to the left corner and picks up pan, moves to the center of the room, places pan on hotplate, turns on hot plate, and waits for the water to boil. Subject turns off hotplate and exits room.
Experiment II.
Physicist: Subject enters a classroom and observes the instructions written on the blackboard: Boil water. Subject scans the room and notices a pan of water in the right front corner of the room and an electric hotplate in the front-middle of the room. Subject walks to right corner and picks up pan, moves to the center of the room, places pan on hotplate, turns on hot plate, and waits for the water to boil. Subject turns off hotplate and exits room.
Mathemetician: Subject enters a classroom and observes the instructions written on the blackboard: Boil water. Subject scans the room and notices a pan of water in the right front corner of the room and an electric hotplate in the front-middle of the room. Subject walks to corner and picks up pan, moves to the left corner of the room, places pan in the corner, then turns and exits room. When asked about the boiling water subject responded "Reduction to the previous case."
Well, I guess you had to be there.
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)4. I trained as a mathematician and first heard a version of that joke
from one of my undergrad teachers many decades ago
I still think it's funny
But maybe you do have to be there
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)5. Yeah, I, too, was planning on a career as an academic mathematician...
...until I got sucked into a computer/software startup in the 80's. Probably the 3rd or 4th best thing that ever happened to me. I would have been a poor quality, unhappy, unproductive mathematician.
Besides, what humor is there in mathematics??
What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape. Ha-ha.
What's yellow and equivalent to the Axiom of Choice? Zorn's lemon. h-h
How many great songs are there about mathematicians??? Ok, there's one, Tom Lehrer's Lobachevsky:
Here's to life as it happens, s4p.
goldent
(1,582 posts)6. Mathematicians know that iff is not a typo
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)7. iirc some people still regard "iff" as a typo for "iffi"
"iffi" is supposedly the original version: "if" for "<=" and "fi" for "=>" so "iffi" for "<=>"
goldent
(1,582 posts)8. I've never seen "iffi"
although I like the derivation.
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)9. Here it still is, in a 1991 philosopher's text on logic, long after it vanished