Science
Related: About this forum"Making of Europe unlocked by DNA"
(I've used quotes because the article doesn't seem to justify such an expansive claim; but it's still interesting)
But the extent to which present-day people are descended from the indigenous hunters versus the newcomers that arrived in the Neolithic has been a matter of some debate.
...
But, from the Middle Neolithic onwards, DNA patterns more closely resembled those of people living in the area today, pointing to a major - and previously unrecognised - population upheaval around 4,000 BC.
Co-author Prof Alan Cooper, from the University of Adelaide in Australia, said: "What is intriguing is that the genetic markers of this first pan-European culture, which was clearly very successful, were then suddenly replaced around 4,500 years ago, and we don't know why.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22252099
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)Ballard says 5000BC for the flood; your second link 7500BC-6000BC. Or there's 7150 years before the present as another estimate. The DNA evidence is from 4500-4000BC.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)The dates for the Black Sea flooding may be more accurate since they rely on dating organic evidence left. The DNA dates are less reliable - they estimate the rate of mutation which is a ball park figure. In many cases in the past DNA rates of mutation have been found to be completely inaccurate.
The other factor is the rate of migration of peoples. Even if the Black Sea flooding dates were earlier, the populations displaced by the flooding would not have immediately invaded Europe. The flooding would just be the start of population movements that could take hundreds of years.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)I'm an H16 and the study shows that my haplogroup looks to be before the corded ware peoples in Europe. And my grandmother hails from the same region 5k years later is pretty cool.