Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mathematical clock (Original Post) dipsydoodle Jan 2013 OP
Whoever created it got 5:00 wrong. (nt) ehrenfeucht games Jan 2013 #1
yeah, typesetting - factorial needs to be outside the radical phantom power Jan 2013 #2
Yeah, I was just looking at that. BlueStreak Jan 2013 #3
The French wanted to decimalize time pokerfan Jan 2013 #4
Why not 10 months too? BlueStreak Jan 2013 #5
Time to face it, ten sucks as a base pokerfan Jan 2013 #7
In order for that to work, you would need to buy two of these BlueStreak Jan 2013 #8
Or.... pokerfan Jan 2013 #9
Months aren't that arbitrary - they come from the lunar cycle muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #11
And don't get me started on gradients! Dr. Strange Jan 2013 #13
I just noticed that as well. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #12
I bought a very similar clock Blappy Jan 2013 #6
It's that Herman Cain's clock? tridim Jan 2013 #10

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
4. The French wanted to decimalize time
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:29 PM
Jan 2013


French Revolutionary Time: 10 hours in a day, 100 minutes in an hour, 100 seconds in an hour... If you're going to go metric, go all in.

http://io9.com/5886129/the-short-strange-history-of-decimal-time

The downside is that ten isn't evenly divisible into thirds or quarters. But we have ten fingers, so there's that....
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
5. Why not 10 months too?
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 01:04 PM
Jan 2013

Days and years relate directly to the movement of the earth in relation to the sun, but months are a bit more arbitrary. I think it makes a lot more sense for the year to begin either on a solstice or equinox.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
7. Time to face it, ten sucks as a base
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 02:16 PM
Jan 2013

The number twelve, a highly composite number, is the smallest number with four non-trivial factors (2, 3, 4, 6), and the smallest to include as factors all four numbers (1 to 4) within the subitizing range. As a result of this increased factorability of the radix and its divisibility by a wide range of the most elemental numbers (whereas ten has only two non-trivial factors: 2 and 5, with neither 3 nor 4), duodecimal representations fit more easily than decimal ones into many common patterns, as evidenced by the higher regularity observable in the duodecimal multiplication table.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duodecimal

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
8. In order for that to work, you would need to buy two of these
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:37 PM
Jan 2013


6 finger, 6 finger, man alive!

How'd I ever get along with five?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,382 posts)
11. Months aren't that arbitrary - they come from the lunar cycle
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 03:56 PM
Jan 2013

of 29.53059 days from new moon to new moon (or full moon to full moon). You round that up to 30, and you create a calendar of 12 30 day months. You've either already worked out that the year is about 365 days, or it will become apparent after a year or two of using a 360 day year that 365 is closer. So you say "OK, a division into 12 is convenient, and 30 is close; we'll make a few months 31 days". The need for leap years becomes apparent after a few decades. The only really silly bit of our calendar is February having 28 days, normally. You could have it as 5 or 6 months of 31 days, and the rest 30.

It seems the start of the year, relative to the winter solstice, was set by Julius Caesar and his Senate in a combination of astronomy, politics, superstition and when the new moon was the year he reformed the calendar: http://www.hermetic.ch/cal_stud/cal_art.html

To really confuse things, at some times in English history, the start of the year has been taken as 25th March.

From the 12th century to 1752, the civil or legal year in England began on 25 March (Lady Day)[7] so for example the execution of Charles I was recorded at the time in Parliament as happening on 30 January 1648 (Old Style).[8] In modern English-language texts this date is usually recorded as "30 January 1649" (New Style).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Style_and_New_Style_dates


And then there's the move to the Gregorian calendar; which is responsible for the British financial year still starting not on 25th March, but April 6th; and for the October Revolution in Russia starting, as far as the West was concerned, on the 7th November ...

Blappy

(84 posts)
6. I bought a very similar clock
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 01:25 PM
Jan 2013

That is very similar to a clock from the triple nine society, sold at cafepress. One o'clock is slightly different, but the factorial is in the correct place at the 5 o'clock position.

[link:http://www.cafepress.com/triplenine.2445706|

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Mathematical clock