Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumThat’s no primate: It’s a fish!
CORVALLIS, Ore. A seven million-year-old South American fossil from a species known as Arrhinolemur scalabrinii which translates literally to Scalabrinis lemur without a nose has long been a curiosity because there is only one specimen in existence and it is unlike most other primates.
There is a reason for that, scientists have discovered. The lemur without a nose is actually a fish.
Classified as a mammal since it was first described in 1898, Arrhinolemur scalabrinii will at last take its rightful place among its piscatorial brethren following a detailed analysis by scientists from Argentina, Oregon State University and the Smithsonian Institution. Results of their analysis have just been published in the professional journal, Neotropical Ichthyology.
The name given to the fossil back in 1898 should have given a clue that something was wrong, said Brian Sidlauskas, a fisheries expert in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at Oregon State University and co-author of the study. It isnt unusual to see a species reassigned to a different genus, but you dont often see one moved to an entirely different class.
Here is the unusual tale of Arrhinolemur scalabrinii, or the lemur without a nose (at the link)
http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2012/oct/that%E2%80%99s-no-primate-it%E2%80%99s-fish
There is a reason for that, scientists have discovered. The lemur without a nose is actually a fish.
Classified as a mammal since it was first described in 1898, Arrhinolemur scalabrinii will at last take its rightful place among its piscatorial brethren following a detailed analysis by scientists from Argentina, Oregon State University and the Smithsonian Institution. Results of their analysis have just been published in the professional journal, Neotropical Ichthyology.
The name given to the fossil back in 1898 should have given a clue that something was wrong, said Brian Sidlauskas, a fisheries expert in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at Oregon State University and co-author of the study. It isnt unusual to see a species reassigned to a different genus, but you dont often see one moved to an entirely different class.
Here is the unusual tale of Arrhinolemur scalabrinii, or the lemur without a nose (at the link)
http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2012/oct/that%E2%80%99s-no-primate-it%E2%80%99s-fish
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1171 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That’s no primate: It’s a fish! (Original Post)
cleanhippie
Oct 2012
OP
MADem
(135,425 posts)1. I'd love to see one of those "artist's renderings" of the thing!
I did a little googling, and all I found so far were reproductions of that crappy little "fossil" pic.
Oh well--all things in time, I am sure!
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)2. I'm sure something will come up.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)3. Something like this?????
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)4. Hahahahaha! Yes, just like that.
Well done!