How Anti-Semitism Became a Social Movement
Anyone can joineven Jews.
Anti-Semitism was born in modern societies because the Jew did not assimilate himself, wrote the French-Jewish thinker Bernard Lazare in 1894, a few months after the arrest of Captain Alfred Dreyfus on charges of treason. But, Lazare continued, when anti-Semitism ascertained that the Jew was not assimilated, it reacted in two conflicting directions, simultaneously reproach[ing] him for it and . . . [taking] all necessary measures to prevent his assimilation in the future.
This pattern, which Lazare presciently identified as the fundamental and everlasting contradiction of anti-Semitism, and which we would call a Catch-22, seems to me to lie at the root of the existential dilemma of contemporary French Jews. And not of them alone. At stake here, as Robert Wistrich observes in his masterly essay in Mosaic, is much more than the fate of a single minority community. In the beginning of the end of French Jewry, Wistrich writes, we may also be witnessing the slow death of the French republican idealthe collapse, as he put it in his 2010 magnum opus A Lethal Obsession, of any consensual national project or unifying social bond, let alone commonly shared ideals.
And France is hardly the only nation affected. This past summer, raw hatred of Jews rose to dramatic heights in Great Britain, the Netherlands, Germany (where mobs urged gassing the Jews), and elsewhere. When it comes to anti-Semitism, a post-war, post-Holocaust consensus is breaking down all over Western Europeright alongside the concurrent breakdown of the EUs promised ideal of a transcontinental, inter-communal political identity. Such an identity might indeed have permitted European Jews to escape Lazares everlasting contradiction: rejected for being Jewish, lambasted for remaining Jewish. But it may be too late.
Still, however consistent with the past may be the motifs of modern anti-Semitism, it has not been easy to pinpoint the motive force behind its present resurgence. It is not enough to say, as many do, that the main culprit, in France or elsewhere, is the left, or nationalist extremism, or the Muslims, or the Internet, or some combination of these. That is to confuse the multiple, overlapping expressions of a problem with the problem itself. I would suggest a different point of departure, one that appreciates the radically new situation of Western Jews themselves at this moment in their history.To see this, it would help to take a preliminary step backward.
more...
http://mosaicmagazine.com/response/2014/10/how-anti-semitism-became-a-european-social-movement/