Please help me understand the doctrine
We all know the Pope is infallible. But what happens when the Pope resigns. Does he become fallible again?
That doesn't seem quite fair. Isn't he the same man he was yesterday? Why wouldn't he remain infallible?
If you have a new Pope and an ex-Pope, both being infallible, and they disagree about something, which one is right?
And there is no question the Pope was infallible at the moment when he announced his resignation, so his resignation must be part of his infallibility, right? But it wouldn't make any sense for an infallible being to make himself fallible, because that would mean he was never infallible in the first place, or else such a thing wouldn't have been possible.
I'm so confused.
CurtEastPoint
(18,656 posts)"...the Pope is preserved from the possibility of error[1] "when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church".[2]
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)but he isn't infallible when dealing with Jews, Muslims, or atheists?
Do the Baptists agree about that?
CurtEastPoint
(18,656 posts)Of course, many members ignore this doctrine as I am sure most others do as well.
rug
(82,333 posts)Like anything else, anyone is free to take it or leave it. But, if you take it, that is what you take.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)this Pope continue to protect the priests who had molested so many children? That would seem to fit well under the category heading of "morals".
rug
(82,333 posts)If you are to understand that, I suggest you realize where you are before proceeding further.