Religious studies 50 years after the Schempp decision
Oct 02, 2013 by Sarah Barringer Gordon
Recently, Secretary of State John Kerry explained that if he could do it all over again, he would major in comparative religion. Were it not for a Supreme Court decision 50 years ago, this might not have even been possible.
Weve been commemorating events from the anniversaries of the Civil War and the civil rights movement. But this landmark was not about race; it was about religion. In Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), the Court held that Bible reading and the Lords Prayer in public schools violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But while the Court declared that teaching children how to practice religion was unconstitutional, the majority and concurring opinions in Schempp also insisted that the academic study of religion was a valid and essential approach.
Winnifred Fallers Sullivan and her religious studies colleagues at Indiana University recently organized a conference to examine the legacy of the caseand of this distinction the Court made. Jan Shipps, Nancy Levene, Emma Wasserman, James Turner, Jonathan Sheehan, Mark Chancey and Steven K. Green were all there, among many others. While the Courts opinion was clearly directed to religious exercises in public schools, Schempp is also an important subject in the history of religious studies. Religion scholars often credit the decision with creating the field.
Many conference participants revisited this claim, several arguing that the Court provided a valuable constitutional justification for the field in public universities. Sarah Imhoff argued that before the decision the field itself was already sophisticated, forward-looking, and increasingly accepted at universities (mostly private, but also some public) around the country. The conference, then, provided an opportunity to revisit the case itself, andthrough the sharp divisions in the various opinions in Schemppto consider whether the categorical separation of religious from secular can survive close scrutiny.
http://www.christiancentury.org/blogs/archive/2013-10/religious-studies-50-years-after-thenbspschemppnbspdecision
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0374_0203_ZO.html