Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumSCOTUS’ Decision on Birth Control Benefit Could Affect All Workers’ Rights
While conservatives took some hits in public opinion by attacking Sandra Fluke in a sexualized fashioneven going so far, as Rush Limbaugh did, to call her a slut and demand that she perform in porn in order to get insurance coverage for contraceptionthe entire spectacle did manage to succeed in one regard. The right did successfully plant the idea that the battle over the birth control benefit in the Affordable Care Act was one of religion vs. sex, which inevitably leads many people to think that as long as they arent sexually active women of reproductive age, then it doesnt affect them personally. But the ugly reality is that this entire battle is about something bigger, something more terrifying. Its about private businesses and corporations creating a legal loophole that allows them to opt out of an array of worker protections and other regulations, all by citing religious freedom as a reason. With the birth control benefit heading for the Supreme Court, we should all be worried about the possibility of a blanket decision that allows your boss to pretty much do whatever he likes, as long as he tacks because Jesus said so at the end of his decision.
Whats at stake is this: The argument in court isnt ew, sex is bad, naughty, naughty!, though that is clearly the argument being used in the court of public opinion. In real court, the argument is that businesses have a right to opt out of any law they claim conflicts with their religious beliefs. From some of the coverage of a successful suit arguing just that in Florida:
U.S. District Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich issued a 37-page decision late Tuesday afternoon declaring corporations do have First Amendment freedom of religion protections.
Any action that debases, or cheapens, the intrinsic value of the tenet of religious tolerance that is entrenched in the Constitution cannot stand, Kovachevich wrote.
The notion that a business, which has no brain, can have a belief is, of course, preposterous. Unfortunately, the conservative-controlled Supreme Court is open to preposterous arguments, so long as the conclusion is that corporations can do whatever they want. The 2010 Citizens United decision, for instance, eliminated all sorts of campaign finance restriction on corporations on the grounds that they are the same thing as persons, and thus have freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. Its not a big leap to suggest that this same logic will extend to religion, with corporations being deemed persons that can hold religious beliefs. Do corporations pray? Do they go to church? No, of course not, but they dont live and die like people, either, and that didnt stop the Supreme Court from deciding to treat them as people.
http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/09/30/scotuss-decision-on-the-birth-control-benefit-could-affect-all-workers-rights/
Whats at stake is this: The argument in court isnt ew, sex is bad, naughty, naughty!, though that is clearly the argument being used in the court of public opinion. In real court, the argument is that businesses have a right to opt out of any law they claim conflicts with their religious beliefs. From some of the coverage of a successful suit arguing just that in Florida:
U.S. District Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich issued a 37-page decision late Tuesday afternoon declaring corporations do have First Amendment freedom of religion protections.
Any action that debases, or cheapens, the intrinsic value of the tenet of religious tolerance that is entrenched in the Constitution cannot stand, Kovachevich wrote.
The notion that a business, which has no brain, can have a belief is, of course, preposterous. Unfortunately, the conservative-controlled Supreme Court is open to preposterous arguments, so long as the conclusion is that corporations can do whatever they want. The 2010 Citizens United decision, for instance, eliminated all sorts of campaign finance restriction on corporations on the grounds that they are the same thing as persons, and thus have freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. Its not a big leap to suggest that this same logic will extend to religion, with corporations being deemed persons that can hold religious beliefs. Do corporations pray? Do they go to church? No, of course not, but they dont live and die like people, either, and that didnt stop the Supreme Court from deciding to treat them as people.
http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/09/30/scotuss-decision-on-the-birth-control-benefit-could-affect-all-workers-rights/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 867 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS’ Decision on Birth Control Benefit Could Affect All Workers’ Rights (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Oct 2013
OP
edhopper
(33,580 posts)1. Well you know
leave beliefs alone as long as it doesn't hurt anyone blah, blah, blah...
And would Christian Scientist owners be allowed to deny all employees healthcare because of their beliefs?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)3. Yeah, isn't it a surprise that a banal platitude falls apart.
After all, those who oppose birth control and abortion truly believe that someone is being harmed (a fetus). Who are we to judge their deeply-held religious beliefs?
rug
(82,333 posts)2. This is more about corporations than it is religion.
When the Supreme Court in Citizens United recognized free speech rights in the artificial person of corporations, it opened up the door to corporate "conscience" and corporate conscience clauses. That is a far cry from human rights and human conscience clauses. When Citizens United ends, these arguments end.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)4. I thought that the claims by these companies had been failing pretty decisively
in the lower courts.
struggle4progress
(118,286 posts)5. reagan appointee