Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 04:49 AM Sep 2013

Some Christians are siding with Scientologists in a key abuse case........

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2013/september-web-only/some-christians-are-siding-with-scientologists-in-key-abuse.html?paging=off
**************
The Church of Scientology is asking the Supreme Court to let it use clergy-penitent privilege to keep secret more than 18,000 pages of documents on former member and employee Laura DeCrescenzo. It has picked up some unusual allies—the National Council of Churches (NCC) and the Rutherford Institute, a civil liberties organization.

DeCrescenzo is suing Scientology and alleging a number of abuses...........
**************
This is a complex one, and you may find it tl;dr. In a nutshell Scientology is trying to use its clergy confessional privilege to shelter data that have been read already by hundreds (!) of people. The National Council of Churches seems to be giving this the nod. Since the State of California sees it otherwise, fireworks have ensued.




2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some Christians are siding with Scientologists in a key abuse case........ (Original Post) dimbear Sep 2013 OP
The penintent's privilege is not as sweeping as is often thought. rug Sep 2013 #1
The distinction to me would be answered by asking exactly who is being protected here. cbayer Sep 2013 #2
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
1. The penintent's privilege is not as sweeping as is often thought.
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 10:40 AM
Sep 2013

It applies in only a few discrete circumstances. I doubt that it applies to all 18,000 pages, particularly since the confidences are made face-to-face and are unrecorded.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. The distinction to me would be answered by asking exactly who is being protected here.
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 11:00 AM
Sep 2013

The rules are in place to protect the penitent. In this case, it appears that they are being invoked to protect the Scientology hierarchy.

The NCC support speaks to a rather narrow aspect of this and I'm not sure it really supports the Scientology case.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Some Christians are sidin...