Religion
Related: About this forumWhat is God?
What is God? Is it an idea you have been taught by your family, friends, church, and culture? You may have noticed that there is great variability in what people around you believe about God. Who is right, and how do you know? What if you've been worshipping the wrong God all this time?
What is God? Perhaps what you are worshipping is your own unique understanding of God based on everything you've been taught, your personal experiences, and how you've interpreted them. This would certainly make sense and is probably how most religious people understand God. But how is this meaningfully different from worshipping yourself? Wouldn't this mean that worship is really a form of self-love?
What is God? And if you aren't sure, are you only claiming to believe in it because you have been told that you are supposed to do so? Perhaps your faith has been misplaced. You just might be an atheist in hiding.
http://www.atheistrev.com/2010/07/what-is-god.html
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)so there are billions of gods
MarkCharles
(2,261 posts)God is a fabrication of the human mind, an image of a perfection coming from an imperfect mind, and reflecting that imperfect mind, with all the same blind spots and logical fallacies.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)How does one measure the mind??
And what are the facts to back up your claim of imperfect minds??
And seeing how there are billions of gods how do you know that all of them are fabrications??
Where is your proof??
Have you investigated all of them??
edit: changed 'how' to 'have'
MarkCharles
(2,261 posts)If it is the latter, I invite anyone on the planet to "disprove" my "theory".
Here's ANOTHER "theory" I will invite any of the 7 billion people on the planet to disprove:
There is no entity in the realm of all of existence that can actually be PROVED to be a "god".
And the corollary thereto:
There is no god!
With evidence, logic, and any scientific or mathematical methods available to any and all of us humans: Prove me wrong.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)You talked of imperfect minds, I asked to back up your statement
You talked about god being a fabrication, I asked you to disprove all the billions........
It is not on me to disprove your assumptions, it is on you to prove and state your case
mr blur
(7,753 posts)lies with the claimant.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)tama
(9,137 posts)every logical system containing number theory contains "truths" that cannot be proven inside a finite set of axioms, is a logical statement proven by Gödel.
Gödel's proof of limits of provability is logical, scientific and mathematical method available also to you. I have full confidence in your intellectual ability to comprehend and internalize that proof and give a meaningful role in how you communicate. The will to do so is up to you. I can only show you where the fountain is, I cannot force you to drink.
KT2000
(20,581 posts)and it is the one that should be asked whenever religion is injected into national and local politics.
Another question is "What is a Christian?" In my small town there are probably 35 Christian churches.
MarkCharles
(2,261 posts)Some self-proclaimed Christians stand up for women, and for gay folks, and work hard to make their rights equal to others.
Other Christians, (Mitt Romney, for example) rip off thousands of hard-working people in order to legally make a big big profit and then campaign for President in order to squelch the rights of so many others in our nation.
All of them "claim" to be "Christians".
Few of them know the damage that they do.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)As child rearing practices improve in cultures, God becomes less violent and more loving. (Wars also decrease).
Full helping-mode parenting obviates God completely.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)If one believes in a god, then god exists for that individual.
tama
(9,137 posts)Individual has the same basic meaning as atom, that which can't be divided. Which sounds another way of saying 'a whole in itself'.
A reductionist scientist searches for the theory that has indivisible beauty. Einstein would not mind calling such a theory (individual, relativistic) 'God'. Others just don't like that word, and I'm not blaming them.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Don't scientists use theory to search for proof? Right now they are searching for proof of the so-called God Particle.
tama
(9,137 posts)a-privative and tomos, which means cut. Whole that you cant cat into parts.
Reductionist scientist are searching for the final theory that can explain everything. The uncuttable and indivisible partiture of equations that nothing can be taken from and nothing added, which is perfect as it is. There is much beauty in that quest.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)So, since atoms have been split, are they no longer atoms, in the pure sense of the word? Or is the atom the smallest stable form of any element?
tama
(9,137 posts)Instead of smallest particle (measurability ends at Planck scale) there is search for the perfect set of equations that unite the four basic force-fields.
Silent3
(15,213 posts)...or wishful thinking. Not a very impressive sort of God, even if the individual imagining that God is impressed.
And/or you're using a very weak notion of what it means to "exist".
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Does a thought exist? Does an idea exist? If so, then the existence of God and what that word means is purely subjective.
Silent3
(15,213 posts)Do you bother to make any distinction between the way you and your friends and family "exist", and the way fictional characters "exist"?
Which kind of existing do you think it is that gods do?
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Gods exist in books and myths and the minds of others.
Silent3
(15,213 posts)I'm sure you're perfectly capable of continuing to be evasive about this, but I doubt that you don't know what I'm getting at.
"If one believes in a god, then god exists for that individual" sounds like nothing more than a diplomatic way of saying gods don't exist at all, at least any more than fictional characters do, but without being quite so rude as to call gods works of fiction or figments of the imagination.
And if you aren't merely being diplomatic, are you actually arguing for some sort of fuzzy new-agey "create your own reality" reality where thinking a thing is real is as real as real gets?
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Because that's how I see it. If someone believes in a god, it's a personal belief and personal beliefs are important to people. It's not about being diplomatic, but being respectful of others. Who are you and I to determine what beliefs others should have. I have found that their is no fruitful discussion to be had in attacking an individual's religious beliefs. However, challenging the ideas and building blocks that form those beliefs has the potential to bear fruit. I find that some atheists are as abrasive as the most strident bible thumper. They are like vicious dogs who attack any vulnerable spot, in an effort to subdue their prey. That's why many of us don't label ourselves atheists or christians, because we don't embrace a mob mentality. It's kind of ironic that most of the proselytizers in this country tend to be either fundamentalist christians and atheists. I would also bet that most of the atheists who proselytize are former christians who have been victimized by the church in some way.
Silent3
(15,213 posts)...bent on the destruction of the American way of life. Because something is important to some people it becomes "true" for them, and should be treated with gingerly respect?
This is a forum for clear, open discussion about matters of religion. This particular conversation is not an out-of-the-blue confrontation with unsuspecting believers, it is not proselytizing. Weasel words serve no useful purpose here.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)As I have said, it is fine to attack the ideas and beliefs, but not the individuals who happen to embrace them. Insulting people because of their faith is hardly progressive.
The OP is definitely proselytizing. He consistently posts flame bait in bitter attacks against christians of all stripes. In his ramblings, he broad brushes all religious people as delusional. Well, I see those of his ilk as insecure wannabe atheist messiahs, constantly looking for recognition by "deprogramming" believers.
I think there are two basic kinds of atheist:
Those, like myself, who just outgrew the religious nonsense, kept what we wanted, discarded the rest and got on with our lives.
Those, like the poster, who, from their own personal experiences, are angry and embittered to the point that they feel the need to enlighten and free those who remain prisoners of their delusions.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Ganesh, Mithra or Huycau? MarkCharles? Or GliderGuider perhaps?
spin
(17,493 posts)tama
(9,137 posts)Well said.
Silent3
(15,213 posts)...which might loosely be called "self love".
tama
(9,137 posts)grow hair back on your scalp?
And yep, life is sexy.
Plantaganet
(241 posts)God is a concept by which we measure our pain.
Religion, meanwhile, is a smile on a dog.
tama
(9,137 posts)There are also those who smile WITH a dog, and let a dog be a teacher and a friend.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)Once you realize that you can relate to a phenomenon as an "it", or as a "you", then you see how arbitrary this choice is. A cat can be an "it" or a "her/you", all the parts of the human body and the body itself can be viewed as an "it" through a medical lens, or as a "you" when making love. Once you begin to relate to the mystery of existence as a "you" rather than an "it", than you've opened your mind to having a concept of a personal God.
mia
(8,361 posts)I came to know this when I was six years old, just before I made my first communion. I still believe it.
As an adult. I no longer believe that the "Catholic Church" has all the answers.
RegieRocker
(4,226 posts)Trying to convert believers into non believers.
edhopper
(33,580 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Or is spouting outrageous, illogical, irrational things just what you do?
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)It's the awareness that things are absolutely perfect in all their perceived imperfection, illusory order and glorious incomprehensibility, because it could not possibly be any other way except as it is.
In this way of understanding Godness, "worship" becomes a simple expression of gratitude. Not gratitude to anything or anyone, but gratitude for this opportunity to experience this perfection. In the same sense, "prayer" becomes a simple expression of the wish to participate more fully and consciously in the perfection - with "Amen" being a peal of cosmic laughter.