Religion
Related: About this forumAre You a Humanist?
Are you a Humanist? Find out by taking this quick quiz, it only takes a minute!
Many people are humanists without even knowing it. If you are non-religious and look to science, reason, empathy, and compassion in order to live an ethical and meaningful life, youre probably a humanist!
http://humanism.org.uk/humanism/are-you-a-humanist/
Your answers are fairly neutral, perhaps a bit dependent on authority or other people or pure emotion. Humanists try to think, and to think for themselves. You may be an agnostic or a humanist or vaguely religious.
Well, there you go.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)...I wonder what question we got wrong?
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)We calculate you are 73% humanist.
Your answers are fairly neutral, perhaps a bit dependent on authority or other people or pure emotion. Humanists try to think, and to think for themselves. You may be an agnostic or a humanist or vaguely religious.
I believe I might be vaguely spiritual. I am not religious at all. I have attempted to be religious or at least develop some rituals in my life, to no avail. I am just not good at making habits.
rug
(82,333 posts)We got put in the same category even though the scores were 60% and 73%.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I think I am pretty close to atheists in my non belief in spiritual beings. But, I don't really believe that there is nothing out there with intelligence. And if there is intelligent life out there we really don't know that it isn't some kind of godlike being or beings.
rug
(82,333 posts)There are religious humanists, secular humanists and atheist humanists.
The word originally had a different meaning, or emphasis, than it does now. Humanities curricula in universities are good examples.
I had a pastor that went off on Humanism once. I can't exactly follow his thinking. But, he did think it was a threat to Christianity. He didn't believe that it was at all possible for people to be Good without God. Personally, I don't know what to think of religious Humanists myself. To each his own I guess.
rug
(82,333 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)He didn't last long in my church. He was rather conservative and somehow that escaped the church elders when they interviewed him. I left before he had been urged to move on, but I did hear through the grape vine he was gone, amicable parting I heard. Anyway, I guess that is what happens when you haven't had a pastor for a long while and are getting antsy to have a more stability.
riverbendviewgal
(4,253 posts)100%
rug
(82,333 posts)riverbendviewgal
(4,253 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)You are a humanist or very close to humanist thinking. Many people are, often without even knowing it!
rug
(82,333 posts)dballance
(5,756 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)dballance
(5,756 posts)We're all friends here. You were way over 50%.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Some had two reasonable choices.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)tama
(9,137 posts)"Humanism" as another word for metaphysical materialism is strange to me, as I've become used to the word 'humanist' in the sense of studia humanitas, or of artes liberales. The academic field.
rug
(82,333 posts)Its current connotation is more affixed to the religious/secular debates.
Those were the days when humanists studied so called "soft sciences", and the math club nerds the "hard science". When I started in University they even mentioned "Humboldt", occasionally, once or twice. And then it was just "graduate and get a job, GDP needs you to grow it!!!"
rug
(82,333 posts)I guess I have to keep her room.
And a small garden to tend, if possible. People write better with little dirt under the fingernails.
And only thing that needs an establishment publisher is the writer's big but fragile ego (been there, done that). In the day and age of Internet... and even that is not necessary. A friend published his poetry book as 100% handwork, all by himself, don't know how many copies but gave them all free to readers.
but this is more of an atheism poll ... There are many many religious humanists in the world, so tying atheism to humanism only tells half the story, and weeding out theistic humanists denies their otherwise humanistic tendencies ... Atheists are NOT 100% humanist ....
Mother Teresa was known for trying her utmost to alleviate the needs, wants and woes of her fellow human beings. She questioned her own faith, but rarely wavered in her humanistic commitments ...
As an atheist, I respect religious humanists FAR more than religious fundamentalists ...
rexcat
(3,622 posts)which is a lot differnet than the "religious" humanist groups.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I have no problem knowing they are being fed by theists ...
I applaud ANYBODY who would feed, clothe and house, the hungry, cold and destitute ...
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Read up on it. Hitchens wrote scathing accounts about it. She was not as great as we were led to believe she was.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)100% human, which is probably why I fall 4% short.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)UtahLib
(3,179 posts)86% - You are a humanist or very close to humanist thinking. Many people are, often without even knowing it. I'll have to research this further. Thanks
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)prairierose
(2,145 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,208 posts)Faux pas
(14,684 posts)A few years back I posted something about being a humanist and my ass shredded and handed back to me. Never did understand why.
Meshuga
(6,182 posts)...if I had a better fitting option for the first question.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)are not very ethical. Not sure how to take that.
Bryant
Rob H.
(5,352 posts)Wow, you are a definitely a humanist. Many people are, often without even knowing it!
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I am 83% humanist.
Do you think I should join their organization?
rug
(82,333 posts)Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)Fit what I would have wanted to answer
rug
(82,333 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Thanks for the link, I'd never been to that site.
eomer
(3,845 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Whatever that means.
patrice
(47,992 posts)me who/what God means and I would have had to say I'm not sure, but whatever else I could say about a God, it would be the truest truth there is, which is why it's beyond human grasp.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)rexcat
(3,622 posts)considering I am a secular humanist and adhere to the pricipals outlined by the Council for Secular Humanism where did I go wrong with the other 4%?
Rug, I am surprised you scored 60%. I would have expected a lower score on your part but not surprised about your "vagueness."
rug
(82,333 posts)Mysterous are the ways . . . .
BTW, never mistake precidion for vagueness.
rexcat
(3,622 posts)Really, precidion? You never cease to make me laugh, or is that cry? I can't make up my mind on this one!
Peace be with you.
rug
(82,333 posts)rexcat
(3,622 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)REALLY makes me wonder about that other 10%, though.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)i know i answered a couple questions 'selfishly' but there it is. sorry but animals should be treated with more than respect and yes it's because they're fuzzy what of it?
rug
(82,333 posts)Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)I kind of wonder what the thought process on some of those questions are. Like the one about a beautiful natural scene. I was torn between the "This is life at its best answer" and the "We must protect it" answer. I would have said both if I could and I know picking one over the other actually lowered my score a little bit.
HarveyDarkey
(9,077 posts)Wow, you are a definitely a humanist. Many people are, often without even knowing it!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)But the damn test stops giving me choices after two answers and even allowing all on the page, it won't go. I'm not going to log into the site, if that's what it wants. So I can't get an test result. This is what I was taught at my commie high school:
A Humanist Manifesto, also known as Humanist Manifesto I to distinguish it from later Humanist Manifestos in the series, was written in 1933 primarily by Raymond Bragg and published with 34 signers. Unlike the later manifestos, this first talks of a new religion and refers to humanism as a religious movement meant to transcend and replace previous, deity-based systems. Nevertheless, it is careful not to express a creed or dogma. The document outlines fifteen affirmations on cosmology, biological and cultural evolution, human nature, epistemology, ethics, religion, self-fulfillment, and the quest for freedom and social justice. This latter, stated in article fourteen, proved to be the most controversial, even among humanists, in its opposition to "acquisitive and profit-motivated society" and its call for an egalitarian world community based on voluntary mutual cooperation. The document's release was reported by the mainstream media on May 1, simultaneous with its publication in the May/June 1933 issue of the New Humanist.
Two manifestos followed: Humanist Manifesto II in 1973 and Humanism and Its Aspirations in 2003.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanist_Manifesto_I
I'm going to read the later versions, as this was the older, more liberal version. The part where it says '...and the quest for freedom and social justice. This latter, stated in article fourteen, proved to be the most controversial, even among humanists, in its opposition to "acquisitive and profit-motivated society" and its call for an egalitarian world community based on voluntary mutual cooperation...' has definitely defined my development politically all my life.
I grew up in a family of different faiths if one calls Unitarian, Lutheran, Methodist, atheist, Baptist and ex-communicated (because of divorces) Catholics. All firm secularists. In practice, none of them practiced religion, it was considered for children and that one would grow up out of it. At that time my father handed me the books of Erich Fromme who had Marxist leanings in his approach to life, human society and psychology, as well as Margaret Meade and other such writers of those days. I gave attention to JFK and all the civil rights movements growing up and worked in them, despite a number of failures that took years.
Then watched with disgust at what I call the great leap backwards as reactionaries came to power in the era of Reagan by trading in on religious fears of the public and began their revisionist American history. It's been downhill with scant attention paid to what I deem important until recently.
Apparently my introduction to humanism was not in pace with capitalist America. And as such, may have turned me into a foolish idealist or a flake by some At any rate, it's a little too late for me to turn back now, so I go forth still learning.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)So I am now up to date. Yup, 100% if there is such a thing. I don't feel that it puts me at odds with those who still enjoy their faith so long as they keep it in check, don't go the theocratic route and don't stop humanity moving forward or oppress others by getting into things that are none of their business. It adds color to their lives and gives many things meaning, and oftern a greater appreciation of life.