Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:01 PM Jan 2013

Group’s goal: Take religion out of politics and policy

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/groups-goal-take-religion-out-of-politics-and-policy-86589.html


Edwina Rogers wants to focus on getting religion out of such places as public school science classes. | AP Photo

By PATRICK GAVIN | 1/22/13 9:58 PM EST

There were plenty of references to God during Monday’s presidential Inauguration, and one group is hoping that’ll change soon.

Edwina Rogers, executive director of the Secular Coalition for America, thinks that the decision to take the presidential oath with one hand on a Bible seems a bit outdated.

“It’s a bit of an outdated process,” Rogers said. “I would love to see the U.S. progress and eliminate some of those traditions.”

While the president outlined a second-term vision on such issues as the environment and immigration, Rogers has a different plan for the next four years: gaining greater progress and access for nonbelievers in the realm of public policy. Her effort is bolstered by a Pew poll out this month that reported an increase in the number of members of Congress who don’t specify a religious affiliation. Although Rogers’s cause suffered a setback when the first openly atheist member of Congress — Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) — left Congress this year, a new member — Rep. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) — says she has no religious affiliation.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/groups-goal-take-religion-out-of-politics-and-policy-86589.html#ixzz2JOAIH9Cw
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
1. Leaving aside the political wreckage of Rogers' republicanism, that is a good goal.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:31 PM
Jan 2013

At least as important a goal is keeping politics out of religion since that is the more common phenomenon.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. As much as I dislike her personal politics, there is an upside to choosing her.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:32 PM
Jan 2013

She has *ins* with the Republican party, where the changes really need to take place.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
5. While I agree, they are the ones who are treading all over the 1st amendment
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:53 PM
Jan 2013

and where the most work is needed.

Saw Independent Lens last night on what has happened with the School Board in Texas. It was eye opening and terrifying.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
6. One of the things that most saddens me about my home state
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jan 2013

is that Texas used to be a bastion of Democratic liberalism: Sam Yarborough, Lyndon Johnson (despite his flaws), Henry B. Gonzalez, Ann Richards, Molly Ivens, and others too numerous to count. Oh, and Jim Hightower. I miss him.

What have we got now? Governor Goodhair, gods help us.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
7. If you missed it, watch last night's Independent Lens - "The Revisionists"
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:18 PM
Jan 2013

Something has got to be done about TX (and any other state that is following this path)

okasha

(11,573 posts)
8. The good news is that the TSBE is now much more balanced.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:38 PM
Jan 2013

The right-wing nuts are now down from seven to five, five members are Democrats and another five, moderates. The coalition between the last two groups can control the excesses of the right-wingers and even get some decent policy made. In any case, the Board lost a good deal of its influence when individual school districts were empowered to choose their own textbooks, rather than having to accept the Board's mandate.

The bad news is that it's going to take a while to get the bad textbooks perpetuated by Texas' buying power out of the system.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
9. I think the estimate for correcting this (given by the show) was 20 years.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:41 PM
Jan 2013

That's 20 years of students being fed anti-science in areas all across the country.

Fortunately, CA, as the second biggest purchaser, also has some major sway with the publishers.

Good news about the rebalancing of the school board. It was really horrifying to watch what they could, and did, do.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
10. I think the show had to assume
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:52 PM
Jan 2013

that the then-prevalent conditions would continue. Three things are a cause for hope, here. The Board pissed off a lot of parents, teachers and other voters with its antics. That led directly to the Legislature's stripping it of its state-wide power to choose texts. Another factor is that science texts become outdated in much less than 20 years these days. And finally, textbook publishers will have far less incentive to--pardon my language--whore themselves out to extremists. We'll see more pressure to put the science back in the science classroom.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
11. Good news all the way around.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:54 PM
Jan 2013

There may have been an addendum to the show which I missed, so I am very glad to hear this from you.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
4. Well, she may have "ins" now
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:42 PM
Jan 2013

but the Republican Party is notorious for turning those they perceive as backsliders, collaborations, or otherwise not sufficiently conservative, into irrelevant pariahs.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Group’s goal: Take religi...