Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 01:53 PM Jan 2013

Reality and Religion

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/standingonmyhead/2013/01/reality-and-religion.html



January 19, 2013
By Fr. Dwight Longenecker

I have just finished the fascinating Proof of Heaven by Dr Eben Alexander. This is the story of the NDE (Near Death Experience) of a brain surgeon. When he came back from the other side he explains (as do most who have an NDE) how much more real the other world is than this one. He doesn’t talk much about religion, but he explains how, after his experience, when he went back to church–with it’s music, stained glass and sense of the sacred, he suddenly ‘got it’. He sees what religion is really for. It is meant to give you a glimpse of heaven. Of course more traditionally minded Catholics have been saying this all along–that sacred architecture and liturgy and sacred music is meant to connect us with the other side–give us a glimpse of heaven and take us out of this world.

One of the more intriguing things about this book is Dr Alexander’s musings on the working of the brain and it’s relationship to consciousness. The materialistic mindset says that consciousness is a product of brain activity. Dr Alexander explains his view that consciousness is bigger than the brain, and the brain functions as a kind of filter or organizing machine for consciousness. As it were, funneling the vast consciousness into this materialistic world and allowing it to function within the parameters of the material world we believe to be so “real”. This is a full time job. For the brain to manage all the data from a fast paced, modern, materialistic lifestyle is demanding and as the mind focusses on the material world and the demands of everyday life it can “forget” the higher functions of consciousness, lose the capabilities and be too occupied dealing with the functions of the material world that it does not have the time or capability to be open to the spiritual realities.

Suddenly I understood the reason for the strictures of the monastic life. The monk takes vows of stability, obedience and conversion of life. He lives a life of routine, obedience, poverty and structure. He lives this strict life so that the cares and concerns and pre occupations of dealing with the material world are taken care of. This is so his mind is care free and therefore able to ascend to the spiritual realities and grow into the higher levels of consciousness through prayer, worship and physical self denial. The monk denies himself the physical pleasures and material concerns not because they are bad, but because there is something better.

Alexander also reveals the reason for religion. Religion is not there just to make the world a better place, help the poor, feed the hungry and help people lose weight. It’s there to open the human heart to the reality of the divine. That is why the liturgy is the primary work and necessity of those who are religious. Celebrating Mass, therefore, and saying our prayers in a routine manner is at the very heart of religion. It is what religion is about. The good deeds etc…that’s just the result of the religion, not the point of the religion.

more at link
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
1. Nice read
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:06 PM
Jan 2013

Thanks.....What is posited,reinforces a set of beliefs I find myself embracing more as I grow older..Which is to say,a spirituality exists outside of the fire and brimstone parameters....

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. One thing that really interested me about this is that it is coming from a
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:19 PM
Jan 2013

neurosurgeon. He has a very interesting perspective, imo.

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
4. I agree.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:37 PM
Jan 2013

I am an unapologetic atheist. But I also believe in following where the evidence leads.

Of course there are those who, when the evidence leads where they don't want to go, will say "that's not real evidence." (The "no true Scotsman" argument)

But because of the consistency of the evidence, both cross-culturally, and over the centuries, it needs to be taken seriously.

Another telling bit of information is that the people who say NDEs are not real are only people who have never had that experience. It's like when a rich man says "money's not important." It doesn't seem very credible, considering the source.

(Disclaimer: 1) I have never had an NDE, 2) I have no beliefs one way or the other about god or gods, 3) I have practiced Vipassana meditation daily for well over 40 years, and 4) I have personal experience of things considered "paranormal" and remain open-minded about them.)

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
5. I have never had an NDE, but have been impressed by some of the stories I have heard.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:47 PM
Jan 2013

I tend to lean towards it being a neurological phenomenon, which would account for some of the consistency in the stories, but I am certainly not going to rule out the possibility of it including other things, including something spiritual or to do with a soul.

Your disclaimer is a fascinating revelation and I deeply appreciate your sharing it. You are an individual, as are most of us, and that is why this whole area fascinates me so.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
8. People occasionally fall from great heights in their sleep, but are saved from injury by
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 09:16 PM
Jan 2013

waking up just before they hit the bottom sheet at crushing speed.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Reality and Religion