Religion
Related: About this forumArchbishops Try to Hold it Together, Order Re-Vote on Women Bishops
http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/joannabrooks/6651/archbishops_try_to_hold_it_together__order_re_vote_on_women_bishops/December 3, 2012 1:16am Archbishops Try to Hold it Together, Order Re-Vote on Women Bishops Post by JOANNA BROOKS
Lets try this again.
Thats the official word from the Archbishops Council of the Church of England on the question of womens ordination as bishops, which was voted down November 20 by the Churchs General Synod and will now receive a rehearing no later than July 2013.
Their statement reflects broad dismay and disbelief that Nos prevailed the first time around. And it may also signal an institutional pushback against a numerically and organizationally ascendant evangelical conservative minority that counts among its numbers incoming Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby.
The dominant feeling we have is that a terrible injustice has been done; that real democracy has been violated: 42 dioceses out of 44 voting in favour; the vast majority of people in the Synod voting for women bishops; and yet because this vote required a two thirds majority in all three Houses, the vote failed by six votes in one of the Houses of the General Synod, wrote the Rt. Rev. Mike Hill, Bishop of Bristol, in an address delivered December 1.
Where women are suppressed, denied education and denied their leadership roles, the development of that country is inhibited and held back, Hill continued. It would be unfair to suggest that all the problems of the Church of England would be sorted had we proceeded to allow women into the episcopate, but some of them would. I wholeheartedly believe that the ministry of the Church of England will remain underdeveloped until we get women bishops.
more at link
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)communion follow the lead of the Episcopal Church.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Some are blaming fall in membership and attendance on the ordination of women.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)From what I hear, (CBS) exactly the opposite situation prevailed. A higher percentage of men voted aye than women.
That doesn't sound like politics to me. That sounds like someone remembering scriptural admonitions.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)There could have been political threats, fear of losing what power they had.
I haven't seen anything exploring why the women voted no.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)some exit polling would be welcome.
I do keep in mind a somewhat parallel situation, the anti-suffragettes. They included some remarkably important women, but none of them are likely to show up on stamps or coins for their trouble. Their 'logical' explanations why they as women didn't want to vote seem a bit silly now.