Religion
Related: About this forumFFRF sues IRS to enforce church electioneering ban
http://ffrf.org/news/news-releases/item/16091-ffrf-sues-irs-to-enforce-church-electioneering-banNovember 14, 2012
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is taking the Internal Revenue Service to court over its failure to enforce electioneering restrictions against churches and religious organizations, calling it a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and of FFRFs equal protection rights. FFRF filed the lawsuit today in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. (View the lawsuit here.)
A widely circulated Bloomberg news article quoted Russell Renwicks, with the IRS Tax-Exempt and Government Entities division, saying the IRS has suspended tax audits of churches. Other sources claim the IRS hasnt been auditing churches since 2009. (See AP Religion Writer Rachel Zolls story, IRS Not Enforcing Rules on Churches and Politics.) Although an IRS spokesman claimed Renwicks misspoke, there appears to be no evidence of IRS inquiries or action in the past three years.
As many as 1,500 clergy reportedly violated the electioneering restrictions on Sunday, Oct. 7, 2012, notes FFRFs legal complaint. The complaint also references blatantly political full-page ads running in the three Sundays leading up to the presidential elections by the Billy Graham Evangelical Association.
FFRF, a state/church watchdog based in Madison, Wis., is asking the the federal court to enjoin IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman from continuing a policy of non-enforcement of the electioneering restrictions against churches and religious organizations.
more at link
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Some people tend to just hang out here and might miss it.
sinkingfeeling
(51,478 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Many here seem to think that politics from the pulpit is a new thing from the right. Black churches have always done this, saw it with my own eyes for many years growing up.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)All churches need to comply. Advance political causes - ok. Advance political candidates - not ok.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Black political leadership has had it roots in the church for generations. I can not see them sitting still for this.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I grew up on the south side of Chicago. I saw Jesse Jackson preach repeatedly. I saw MLK preach repeatedly. I saw many, many black religious leaders preach politics.
That is legal, powerful and there is not challenge to it.
What they did not do was promote candidates. That is the problem. While there may be black churches that do this, they need to stop. It's not necessary. They are powerful without doing that.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)YMMV but it was there full time when I was growing up.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)campaign about what they can and can't do.
There is too much at stake here and they have a lot to lose.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)every tax exempt organization is well aware of the restrictions, which aren't particularly complicated. Religion just gives people a feeling of endless privilege and entitlement, a sense that rules and laws simply don't apply where "faith" is involved.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)and they can give up their tax exemption, to which they have no fundamental right. Then let's see how far their principles hold.