Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 01:27 PM Oct 2012

A History of the Unaffiliated: How the "Spiritual Not Religious" Gospel Has Spread

http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/6547/a_history_of_the_unaffiliated%3A_how_the_%22spiritual_not_religious%22_gospel_has_spread/

October 24, 2012A
By MATTHEW S. HEDSTROM


Bumper stickers, yoga pants...and lots of books


You can call them “unaffiliated,” as in a recent Pew poll, or “nones”—or even just “not very religious.” A brand new poll by the Public Religion Research Institute divides this group further (and somewhat counterintuitively) into “unattached,” “atheists/agnostics,” and “seculars.” But whatever you call them, this ever-growing cohort of unchurched Americans makes up, at 23 percent, the single largest segment of Barack Obama’s “religious coalition” (compared to the 37 percent of white evangelicals who support Mitt Romney).

While we have yet to see a “Seculars for Obama” bumper sticker, the unaffliated are clearly having a moment. Media analysis, however, has not gone very deep—there is a story here that goes beyond names and numbers.

Recent sociological work from Courtney Bender, Christian Smith, and others does help us understand who the current crop of unaffiliated are and what they do and believe. Yet we have precious little historical understanding of this critical and growing demographic. What are their roots? What religious, cultural, economic, demographic, and political processes shaped their sensibilities, habits, and makeup?

In order to understand these still-believing “nones,” we need to understand that much of the religious dynamism in the United States happens outside the church walls, and has for some time now. The “rise of the nones” is but the latest phase in the long transformation of religion into what we now commonly call “spirituality.” In my class on “Spirituality in America” at the University of Virginia, we use Leigh Schmidt’s pathbreaking Restless Souls to trace this phenomenon over two centuries, from Ralph Waldo Emerson’s break with New England Unitarianism in the 1830s to the multibillion dollar spirituality industry of today.

more at link
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
1. I strongly suspect that many of the "nones" could find a home
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 01:38 PM
Oct 2012

with the Episcopalians, Lutherans or UCC. (Those are the denominations I'm familiar with ). I think many would be surprised at how closely their brand of "religion" accords with their "spirituality".

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. I agree. I think the more inclusive, progressive protestant denominations
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 01:42 PM
Oct 2012

and the UCC may see an uptick in membership over the coming years.

This tends to be a young group, and it will be interesting to see how they develop, particularly when they start to establish their own families.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
4. They are abandoning more fundamentalist, traditional religious organizations.
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 02:10 PM
Oct 2012

The data, however, shows that many still maintain spiritual and religious beliefs, including those relating to Jesus.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
7. I am referring to those who are currently "nones" not because they do not believe the Gospel,
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 04:43 PM
Oct 2012

but because they believe the Gospel and can't find a church community that preaches and practices it! I can only speak for my birth community, the Roman Catholic Church. Us older folk tend to close out minds to options, and I know many Roman Catholics who believe in Christ but no longer can tolerate the actions of Pope and bishops. Right now they are "nones". I also know several Catholics who have found a welcome home in the denominations I mentioned in the OP. For the record, I myself found that if I wanted to remain a Catholic, I had to become an Episcopalian!

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
8. But how do you know these folks haven't looked at your institution and found it, too, lacking?
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 04:50 PM
Oct 2012

This is sadly a very common attitude of the religious toward the non-religious: "Aw, you've just had bad experiences and haven't found the right church yet!" I find such an assumption patronizing and insulting.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
9. My RC parish went through a rancourus three year period in which
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 06:44 PM
Oct 2012

it was merged with another parish (i.e our Vatican II parish was suppressed in favor of a reform the reform group) under the leadership of a man who the more kindly referred to as a fool. Most descriptions were rather harsher. Our attempts to appeal this decision to the new bishop and to Rome were turned down. My estimate is that about half the people went to another RC parish, a small number went to the assigned parish, a few went to local Protestant congregations (including the Methodists - I forgot them in my OP! and a good third or more became "nones". They are nones not because they don't believe, but because they don't think there is a nearby church home that would speak to them. My OP was discussing those Nones who are in fact believers.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
10. I don't see how your OP made that distinction.
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 08:36 PM
Oct 2012

I'm glad you've qualified it now. But even a none who is a believer (in what? A god? Jesus?) quite possibly won't find a church that fits them. It's hardly a given that there will be a church for them.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
11. It's true some won't find what they are looking for, but some may not
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 11:32 AM
Oct 2012

realize it's worth it to take a look. If the RC Church isn't what it was in 1950, 1970, 1990, etc, neither are many of the mainline Protestant denominations.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»A History of the Unaffili...