Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumPro-life banner elicits complaints
Local and provincial atheist groups say this banner, hanging on city poles, violates the city's own banner policy, which prohibits religious and controversial signage. City lawyers disagree. ANDREA KLASSEN PHOTO/KTW
By Andrea Klassen - Kamloops This Week
Published: October 11, 2012 12:00 PM
Updated: October 11, 2012 12:51 PM
A pro-life banner flying on city-owned poles is meeting opposition from local and provincial atheist groups.
The banner includes silhouettes of a baby, young girl and elderly woman standing under a tree and includes the phrases: "one life can make a difference" and "protect human life week."
It went up downtown on Tuesday, October 2, and will hang on the North Shore over Tranquille Road until Oct. 16.
Bill Ligertwood of the Kamloops Centre for Rational Thought sees the banner as a clear violation of city policy on street banners, which states they may not "promote political parties or points of view, religious points of view, commercial ventures, controversial issues or other content that contradicts the human rights codes."
http://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/news/173753291.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1193 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pro-life banner elicits complaints (Original Post)
rug
Oct 2012
OP
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)1. What state?
I won't open this type of OP without knowing what state it is.
rug
(82,333 posts)3. The Province of British Columbia, Canada.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)5. And all of this time I thought Canadians
were more rational than us...
cbayer
(146,218 posts)2. While not overtly religious, that seems like it clearly violates their own ordinance.
rug
(82,333 posts)4. The cited ordinance also prohibits banners promoting political views.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)7. and controversial issues., which this clearly is.
EC
(12,287 posts)8. Well, putting it there makes it
look more like a drive safe banner.