Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 12:28 PM Nov 2018

A lot of white evangelical voters aren't evangelicals

From the article:

According to the exit polls, 26 percent of the electorate in last week’s midterms consisted of white evangelicals. Yet white evangelicals make up just 15.3 percent of the U.S. adult population, according to PRRI’s widely used survey data. What gives?....

All in all, there’s no reason to think that this situation has changed since 2008. By my back-of-the-envelope calculation, one-third of the “white evangelicals” who voted last week were not evangelicals in the denominational sense. And that covers most of the gap between PRRI’s number of white evangelicals and the exit polls’.


To read more:

https://religionnews.com/2018/11/13/a-lot-of-white-evangelical-voters-arent-evangelicals/

We label ourselves as a means of establishing an identity, and others label us as a way of grouping people, but what does a label really tell us about an individual?
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A lot of white evangelical voters aren't evangelicals (Original Post) guillaumeb Nov 2018 OP
Agreed that there are good people lumped in with bad Cary Nov 2018 #1
There is a reason that white supremacists re comfortable in the GOP. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #5
You"ve got that right but it was meant as an example Cary Nov 2018 #11
Since not all people who are eligible to vote do vote, MineralMan Nov 2018 #2
Yes, but d_r Nov 2018 #10
You can almost tell what kind of Christian someone is by the political party they identify with. CrispyQ Nov 2018 #3
Understood. Well said. eom guillaumeb Nov 2018 #4
There's another explanation YessirAtsaFact Nov 2018 #6
I agree. One example: guillaumeb Nov 2018 #7
A simple, more likely explanation . . . OneBro Nov 2018 #8
The post also talks about how people label themselves. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #9

Cary

(11,746 posts)
1. Agreed that there are good people lumped in with bad
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 12:35 PM
Nov 2018

See our prior discussion.

If I were lumped in with bad people I would see it as my responsibility to distance myself from those bad people. For example if I were a Republican I would quit that party rather than associate with and enable white supremacists. I would not push back against anyone who criticized me for associating with white supremacists.

I actually have Republicans pushing back against me because I criticize them for associating with white supremacists.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
5. There is a reason that white supremacists re comfortable in the GOP.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 01:12 PM
Nov 2018

And that should be a concern for the non-racist GOP voters.

Cary

(11,746 posts)
11. You"ve got that right but it was meant as an example
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 02:01 PM
Nov 2018

I used it to illustrate my point that the good Evangelicals have a duty to distance themselves from the fundamentalists who want to impose their religion on a majority who reject their theology.

MineralMan

(146,331 posts)
2. Since not all people who are eligible to vote do vote,
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 12:48 PM
Nov 2018

Those exit polls may be correct. It is looking only at those who voted. The 15.3 percentage number is based on the entire US population, not just voters.

It's very possible that evangelicals vote in a higher percentage than does the overall population.

Generally, in exit polling, people provide their own description of themselves. So, it may well be that 26% of those who voted actually were evangelicals.

Compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges. The article you quoted from is probably misinterpreting the statistics.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
10. Yes, but
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 01:57 PM
Nov 2018

the point of this article is to refute the claim that "white evangelicals" turned out to vote in over represented numbers. The 15.3% number uses one methodology and definition, the 26% uses another. Per the article, if you use the definition used in exit polls at a national level, it is about 26% (as 39% of white mainline Protestants and 18% of white Catholics describe themselves as "born again or evangelical). So, the article that is quoted from is actually stating how to compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges, rather than misinterpreting these data.

CrispyQ

(36,518 posts)
3. You can almost tell what kind of Christian someone is by the political party they identify with.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 12:49 PM
Nov 2018

Are you a good witch or a bad witch? Are you a "build a wall" Christian or a "build a longer table" Christian?

You being the generic you, not the personal you.

YessirAtsaFact

(2,064 posts)
6. There's another explanation
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 01:14 PM
Nov 2018

A group can be 15% of the registered voters and 26% of the electorate because a larger percentage of this group votes than the percentage of all registered voters who vote.

The looniest evangelicals I know always vote. Tornado warnings couldn’t keep them from voting.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
7. I agree. One example:
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 01:19 PM
Nov 2018

The tendency of older voters to vote at higher numbers gives them a disproportionate voice.

OneBro

(1,159 posts)
8. A simple, more likely explanation . . .
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 01:27 PM
Nov 2018

. . . is that white evangelicals are more likely to vote as compared to others, resulting in a significantly higher percentage of white evangelicals who voted as compared to their percentage of the population.

Group A population =10 people
Group B population = 40 people
Total population = 50 people
Total number of voters = 16

If 8 people from group A vote and 8 people from group B vote, the result is similar to the situation you describe, i.e. smaller percentage of population with higher percentage of “voting power.”

In short, white evangelicals overwhelmingly supported Trump, and the idea the some people are or were only pretending to be white evangelicals for giggles is, well, laughable.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
9. The post also talks about how people label themselves.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 01:31 PM
Nov 2018

And how they are labelled. But we are both aware that participation is higher among some groups. There is a large difference between
eligible voters, registered voters, and active votes. The latter are the only ones that count.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»A lot of white evangelica...