Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 07:35 PM Oct 2017

I dont like niqabs and burqas but they should be legal

From the article:

Those laid-back, liberal-libertine Scandinavians have found a place to draw the line. Denmark will soon become the latest country to ban face coverings for women — which is to say, to ban the niqab, or face veil, and burqas, which include gauze over the eyes..........

Reuters then helpfully reports that this law thus would affect the roughly 200 women in Denmark who wear such garments.


To read more of this latest instance of blatant Islamophobia:

http://religionnews.com/2017/10/16/i-dont-like-niqabs-and-burqas-but-they-should-be-legal/
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I dont like niqabs and burqas but they should be legal (Original Post) guillaumeb Oct 2017 OP
This is tough for me. Making it impossible for women to physically function AJT Oct 2017 #1
The author also wrote: guillaumeb Oct 2017 #2
So female circumcision should be okie dokie.... AJT Oct 2017 #3
It is illegal in the US, Canada, and many other countries. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #4
If you are going to have different standards for an act... trotsky Oct 2017 #14
I draw a logical line behind female genital mutilation, illegal in most countries, guillaumeb Oct 2017 #22
Adult women should be able to choose that for themselves. Mariana Oct 2017 #9
What do you think would happen if a person entered a hospital and said 'please remove my left arm'? AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #12
Depends on what specifically she wants done. Mariana Oct 2017 #15
Oh we know what's different. trotsky Oct 2017 #16
Oh you don't? So I can just walk around completely naked at all times then? AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #13
Is it part of your religion? trotsky Oct 2017 #17
You are free to do as you wish. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #21
Astouding. Go apply that to your previous post and do the fucking math. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #25
Especially among bank robbers. Binkie The Clown Oct 2017 #5
Do you equate the two things? eom guillaumeb Oct 2017 #6
No. I'm pointing out that there are social situations in which hiding one's identity is suspect, and Binkie The Clown Oct 2017 #7
I'm sure there will be agreement that a bank can ban them Lordquinton Oct 2017 #8
Haha nice. trotsky Oct 2017 #11
Curious isn't it? Lordquinton Oct 2017 #26
The second person looked quite pale. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #18
If a man wants to cover up completely and wear a ski mask in public, is that OK? trotsky Oct 2017 #10
What are the regulations governing face coverings? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #19
You can't wear one for an official ID picture. trotsky Oct 2017 #20
Link to specific regulations if you wish. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #23
Nah, I'm not going to. trotsky Oct 2017 #24
Try it with a collandar on your head Lordquinton Oct 2017 #27
A lot of super heros not allowed Angry Dragon Oct 2017 #28

AJT

(5,240 posts)
1. This is tough for me. Making it impossible for women to physically function
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 07:45 PM
Oct 2017

in society and couching it in religion makes me angry. To say that it's "her choice" while raising her to believe she'll be condemned to eternal damnation is nonsense. The covering is to totally control women.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
2. The author also wrote:
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 07:52 PM
Oct 2017
Federal laws, however, aren’t supposed to be tailored to my preference and comfort. Laws against public wearing of such clothes amount instead to cultural chauvinism and, in fact, a compromise of women’s rights.


I cannot tell another what to wear, or what not to wear,or what to believe, or what not to believe. That applies to the men and the women in a family where the women wear coverings.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
4. It is illegal in the US, Canada, and many other countries.
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 07:57 PM
Oct 2017

Do you equate genital mutilation with wearing a face covering?

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
14. If you are going to have different standards for an act...
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 10:35 AM
Oct 2017

depending on whether or not it is done out of religious conviction (as you have admitted that you do), then it's a point worth pondering. Where do you draw the line?

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
22. I draw a logical line behind female genital mutilation, illegal in most countries,
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 12:38 PM
Oct 2017

and wearing something for religious reasons.

And I am aware of the compelling interest angle that governs what government can do in the US..

Mariana

(14,858 posts)
9. Adult women should be able to choose that for themselves.
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 11:56 PM
Oct 2017

As long as a woman knows exactly what her particular surgery would entail and what the effects will be, and she still wants it done, she should be able to. Just like any other cosmetic surgery. Don't you think women should have that right?

Circumcising a child without a compelling medical reason for the surgery, should always be considered a serious crime.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
12. What do you think would happen if a person entered a hospital and said 'please remove my left arm'?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 10:34 AM
Oct 2017

For non-medical personal belief reasons.

Do you think there's a single licensed medical professional in the country that would do it?

Mariana

(14,858 posts)
15. Depends on what specifically she wants done.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 11:24 AM
Oct 2017

See: Labiaplasty and Clitoral Unhooding

It's important to be specific what you mean when you say female circumcision. Clitoral unhooding is probably the procedure most similar to male circumcision, and it is not illegal for a woman to have it done.

Anyway, this thread is about face covering in public in Denmark. I think it's reasonable to prohibit it. We prohibit public nudity, I don't see how this is any different.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
13. Oh you don't? So I can just walk around completely naked at all times then?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 10:35 AM
Oct 2017

presumably you'd enforce 'wear something', even if I would prefer not to .

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
17. Is it part of your religion?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 11:56 AM
Oct 2017

If so, then g-man must say yes. He has stated he believes rules can be broken if you are religious. You have rights that non-believers don't.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
7. No. I'm pointing out that there are social situations in which hiding one's identity is suspect, and
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 11:38 PM
Oct 2017

downright dangerous. Would you feel comfortable in a bank if this person walked :



Or how about this person?



or how about this person?



Or this person?



or this person?



People who make it a habit to hide their identity do not inspire trust.

Where do you draw the line?





Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
8. I'm sure there will be agreement that a bank can ban them
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 11:42 PM
Oct 2017

As private institutions can do that, as has been previously established.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
11. Haha nice.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 10:08 AM
Oct 2017

Yep, let's remember that the g-man expressly agreed:

"...institutions have the right to enforce certain rules."

(But note, he did NOT distinguish between public and private institutions.)

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
18. The second person looked quite pale.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 12:19 PM
Oct 2017

In winter, and if you live in a northern area, do you ever see people walking with covered faces?

How about at Halloween?

How about Asians wearing paper masks?

At Mardi Gras?

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
10. If a man wants to cover up completely and wear a ski mask in public, is that OK?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 10:06 AM
Oct 2017

Can the state force him to remove his ski mask for an official photo ID?

You never did answer that question on the other thread you started about this topic.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
23. Link to specific regulations if you wish.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 12:40 PM
Oct 2017

But generally, in the US, the state must demonstrate a compelling interest in cases of religious discrimination like this.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
24. Nah, I'm not going to.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 12:48 PM
Oct 2017

You insist you don't have to back up any of your claims, so you have absolutely no right to demand others do so.

Next time you renew your driver's license, show up with your face obscured by a ski mask and let me know how it goes.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»I dont like niqabs and bu...