Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumTaj Mahal is Muslim tomb not Hindu temple, Indian court told
Source: The Guardian
Taj Mahal is Muslim tomb not Hindu temple, Indian court told
Government archaeologists reject claim the structure was built by Hindus and that they should be allowed to worship there
Amrit Dhillon in Delhi
Wednesday 30 August 2017 11.17 BST
A court in India has heard testimony from government archaeologists that the Taj Mahal is a Muslim mausoleum built by a Mughal emperor to honour his dead wife delivering an official riposte to claims it is a Hindu temple.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which protects monuments of national importance, had been ordered to give its view in response to a petition filed by six lawyers stating that the Unesco world heritage site in the city of Agra had originally been a temple called Tejo Mahalaya dedicated to the Hindu deity Shiva.
The petition also demanded that Hindus be allowed to worship in it. Only Muslims are permitted to offer prayers at the 17th-century monument.
Dr Bhuvan Vikrama, the ASIs superintending archaeologist in Agra, said he rejected the claims: Our written statement called the claims concocted and we asked the court to dismiss the petition. Its up to the judge to decide what happens.
Claims that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu temple have surfaced periodically, either from lone Hindu mavericks, revisionists, or extremist Hindu groups ever since PN Oak, an Indian writer, published his 1989 book Taj Mahal: the True Story, in which he claimed it was built before Muslim invaders came to India. Proponents of this theory resent that its glory belongs to Indias Muslim heritage and argue that since some of the Mughal invaders destroyed Hindu temples or converted them into mosques, it follows that the Taj Mahal must have originally been a Hindu structure.
-snip-
Government archaeologists reject claim the structure was built by Hindus and that they should be allowed to worship there
Amrit Dhillon in Delhi
Wednesday 30 August 2017 11.17 BST
A court in India has heard testimony from government archaeologists that the Taj Mahal is a Muslim mausoleum built by a Mughal emperor to honour his dead wife delivering an official riposte to claims it is a Hindu temple.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which protects monuments of national importance, had been ordered to give its view in response to a petition filed by six lawyers stating that the Unesco world heritage site in the city of Agra had originally been a temple called Tejo Mahalaya dedicated to the Hindu deity Shiva.
The petition also demanded that Hindus be allowed to worship in it. Only Muslims are permitted to offer prayers at the 17th-century monument.
Dr Bhuvan Vikrama, the ASIs superintending archaeologist in Agra, said he rejected the claims: Our written statement called the claims concocted and we asked the court to dismiss the petition. Its up to the judge to decide what happens.
Claims that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu temple have surfaced periodically, either from lone Hindu mavericks, revisionists, or extremist Hindu groups ever since PN Oak, an Indian writer, published his 1989 book Taj Mahal: the True Story, in which he claimed it was built before Muslim invaders came to India. Proponents of this theory resent that its glory belongs to Indias Muslim heritage and argue that since some of the Mughal invaders destroyed Hindu temples or converted them into mosques, it follows that the Taj Mahal must have originally been a Hindu structure.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/30/taj-mahal-muslim-tomb-not-hindu-temple-indian-court-told
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1646 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taj Mahal is Muslim tomb not Hindu temple, Indian court told (Original Post)
Eugene
Aug 2017
OP
trotsky
(49,533 posts)1. Ah, religion. Peace and love and rainbows. n/t
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)2. How would they rule on the temple of the rock?
Or on the rock, I forget... Or the haggia Sophia?
Iggo
(47,563 posts)3. Oh, boy! Something else for the religionistas to try and kill each other over.