Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,937 posts)
Wed Aug 30, 2017, 10:47 AM Aug 2017

Taj Mahal is Muslim tomb not Hindu temple, Indian court told

Source: The Guardian

Taj Mahal is Muslim tomb not Hindu temple, Indian court told

Government archaeologists reject claim the structure was built by Hindus and that they should be allowed to worship there

Amrit Dhillon in Delhi
Wednesday 30 August 2017 11.17 BST

A court in India has heard testimony from government archaeologists that the Taj Mahal is a Muslim mausoleum built by a Mughal emperor to honour his dead wife – delivering an official riposte to claims it is a Hindu temple.

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which protects monuments of national importance, had been ordered to give its view in response to a petition filed by six lawyers stating that the Unesco world heritage site in the city of Agra had originally been a temple called Tejo Mahalaya dedicated to the Hindu deity Shiva.

The petition also demanded that Hindus be allowed to worship in it. Only Muslims are permitted to offer prayers at the 17th-century monument.

Dr Bhuvan Vikrama, the ASI’s superintending archaeologist in Agra, said he rejected the claims: “Our written statement called the claims concocted and we asked the court to dismiss the petition. It’s up to the judge to decide what happens.”

Claims that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu temple have surfaced periodically, either from lone Hindu mavericks, revisionists, or extremist Hindu groups ever since PN Oak, an Indian writer, published his 1989 book Taj Mahal: the True Story, in which he claimed it was built before Muslim invaders came to India. Proponents of this theory resent that its glory belongs to India’s Muslim heritage and argue that since some of the Mughal invaders destroyed Hindu temples or converted them into mosques, it follows that the Taj Mahal must have originally been a Hindu structure.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/30/taj-mahal-muslim-tomb-not-hindu-temple-indian-court-told
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taj Mahal is Muslim tomb not Hindu temple, Indian court told (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2017 OP
Ah, religion. Peace and love and rainbows. n/t trotsky Aug 2017 #1
How would they rule on the temple of the rock? Lordquinton Aug 2017 #2
Oh, boy! Something else for the religionistas to try and kill each other over. Iggo Aug 2017 #3
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Taj Mahal is Muslim tomb ...