Religion
Related: About this forumPope quietly trims sanctions for sex abusers seeking mercy
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/25/pope-quietly-trims-sanctions-sex-abusers-seeking-mercy/98399022/VATICAN CITY - Pope Francis has quietly reduced sanctions against a handful of pedophile priests, applying his vision of a merciful church even to its worst offenders in ways that survivors of abuse and the popes own advisers question.
One case has come back to haunt him: An Italian priest who received the popes clemency was later convicted by an Italian criminal court for his sex crimes against children as young as 12. The Rev. Mauro Inzoli is now facing a second church trial after new evidence emerged against him, The Associated Press has learned.
n some cases, the priests or their high-ranking friends appealed to Francis for clemency by citing the popes own words about mercy in their petitions, the church official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the proceedings are confidential.
Burke said Francis emphasis on mercy applied to even those who are guilty of heinous crimes. He said priests who abuse are permanently removed from ministry, but are not necessarily dismissed from the clerical state, the church term for laicization or defrocking.
But he also recently said he believed sex abusers suffer from a disease a medical term used by defense lawyers to seek mitigating factors in canonical sentences.
Marie Collins, an Irish abuse survivor and founding member of Francis sex-abuse advisory commission, expressed dismay that the congregations recommended penalties were being weakened and said abusers are never so sick that they dont know what theyre doing.
Victim advocates have long questioned Francis commitment to continuing Benedicts tough line, given he had no experience dealing with abusive priests or their victims in his native Argentina. While Francis counts Bostons Cardinal Sean OMalley as his top adviser on abuse, he has also surrounded himself with cardinal advisers who botched handling abuse cases in their archdioceses.
..
he church official stressed that to his knowledge, none of Francis reduced sentences had put children at risk.
Many canon lawyers and church authorities argue that defrocking pedophiles can put society at greater risk because the church no longer exerts any control over them. They argue that keeping the men in restricted ministry, away from children, at least enables superiors to exert some degree of supervision.
nzoli appealed and in 2014 Francis reduced the penalty to a lifetime of prayer, prohibiting him from celebrating Mass in public or being near children, barring him from his diocese and ordering five years of psychotherapy.
----
SUch compassion for the perpetrators. Not much compassion for the victims
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)ain't what is used to be.
Of course, if a priest is publicly identified as gay, no problem...broom 'em! Pedophile...not nearly as bad, as far as the catholic church is concerned.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Referring of course to your ending.
Do you believe in forgiveness?
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)is spot-on. Wouldn't you agree?
Forgiveness for what, in this case? Does forgiving someone mean not giving them a just punishment?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Editorializing by assuming a motivation not proven by the actual article.
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)It probably isn't compassion for the perpetrators. The church may just want to continue to cover up this behavior or to make it seem as innocuous and excusable as they can in the public eye.
Don't you believe in the free expression of opinions?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)But if any poster habitually seems to assume the worst of some people, and if that opinion is not supported by the evidence presented, I might wonder if the poster is consciously (or unconsciously) exhibiting bias. And judgement can be warped by underlying bias.
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)"Such compassion for the perpetrators. Not compassion for the victims" is the WORST possible assumption someone could make.
Because that was your accusation, one not supported by the evidence presented. How ironic.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I qualified what I wrote numerous times so that there would be no specific accusation against anyone.
At best, the assertion is negative, and so far unproven by any evidence.
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)The fact that you avoided naming a name doesn't change that. Apparently your own biases keep you from even realizing that you're doing it. Another irony.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I am amazed and humbled.
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)And your dodges are fairly transparent. Don't flatter yourself that mind reading is needed to see through you.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)But that might reveal more about you than it does about others.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)If not, there is no need to continue.
The Pope made a decision. One hopes that he made the decision after weighing all of the facts in the case. I have none of the facts in the case.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)I guess you and I disagree.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)lead to clemency.
Based on my very limited reading, it seems that pedophiles either cannot or will not stop. Given that, I would be very reluctant to grant freedom to any convicted pedophile.
At least when we are discussing adults who rape minors. I understand that some convicted sex offenders were minors who had sex with other minors.
So we might be closer on this issue than you feel.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Good. A glimmer of hope.
Heddi
(18,312 posts)How noble of the pope to offer forgiveness to people who did not violate him. To forgive people who did not rape him, who did not threaten him to gain his silence.
How utterly mag-fucking-nanimous of him.
"Oh hey, I know you broke into my neighbor's house when I was away on vacation, killed their cat, punched the dog, and assaulted the family but you know what, it's okay. I FORGIVE YOU"
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)welcome to 2017.
This part:
So Inzoli was given clemency, and later convicted after new evidence emerged.