Religion
Related: About this forumComing Soon to the U.S. Army: Turbans, Beards, Hijabs, and Dreadlocks
In the final days of the Obama administration, the military has issued new guidelines for religious accommodations and dress.
EMMA GREEN
JAN 4, 2017
The Army has issued a new regulation: Effective immediately, brigade-level commanders will be able to grant accommodations to servicemen and women who wear beards, turbans, or hijabs for religious reasonsthe three most common requests for waivers to current guidelines on grooming and dress, according to a letter from the Secretary of the Army, Eric Fanning. The new guidelines also revise hairstyle standards for female soldiers: They can now wear dreadlocks in addition to cornrows and twists, which were allowed in a revision made in 2014.* Like other hairstyles, locks must be relatively small, uniform, neat, and tied off inconspicuously, and women dont have to request an accommodation to wear them.
This might seem like an odd choice for a policy directive in the final days of the Obama administration. It came about largely in response to litigation and advocacy from Sikh servicemen who wear beards and turbans for religious reasons, and who wanted to be able to keep them while actively serving. While this ruling will make a big difference for those soldiers, there are very few of them. Eric Baxter, an attorney at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, one of the firms that has been advocating on behalf of the Sikh soldiers, attributed the timing to fear of continued litigation. The pressure of the lawsuit was a significant factor in deciding this needs to be finished, he said. The time had just come when it was no longer possible to make excuses for why Sikhs need to be excluded.
Its possible that the Army felt it had no options and wanted to put the issue to rest, but also possible the directive reflects some other unstated motive. Regardless of the intent, though, this regulation sends a signal: It makes the Army more inclusive of minority religions and cultures, right as Donald Trump prepares to take office.
The new regulations are a response to a long-standing issue within the military. In the 1986, the Supreme Court heard a case brought by an Orthodox Jewish rabbi, Simcha Goldman, who had been forbidden by the Air Force to wear a yarmulke while on duty and in uniform. The Court deferred to the military. In response, Congress passed a rule stating that servicemen should be able to wear religious apparel. When you look at the legislative history for that law, Congress spoke openly about the need to accommodate Sikhs and Jews, said Baxter. But the military has always construed it as only applying to the yarmulke.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/coming-soon-to-the-us-army-turbans-beards-hijabs-and-cornrows/512204/
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Troubling still is the reputation of the Air Force Academy as a hotbed of the Christian religion.
Will Sikh soldiers be able to also carry the kirpan?
rug
(82,333 posts)Approval depends on where the service member is stationed and whether the change would affect military readiness or the mission.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/15/sikh-us-army-religious-freedom
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)We'll see what happens once Trump is in office.
rug
(82,333 posts)Once it's in place it will be hard to claim it interferes with military missions or discipline.
Of course, two weeks is not a very long test period.