Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 08:37 AM Jul 2016

Is wedding photography art? A wrinkle in religious liberty debate.

Can refusing to take wedding pictures for a gay couple be a free speech issue, not just an question of religious freedom? So far, courts are saying 'no.'



By Warren Richey, Staff writer JULY 15, 2016

Does the United States Constitution consider a series of wedding photographs to be the free speech equivalent of a ham sandwich?

That was Elaine Huguenin’s question.

In 2006, the Albuquerque, N.M., wedding photographer was sued by a lesbian couple for refusing for religious reasons to photograph their same-sex commitment ceremony. The couple said the refusal violated a state law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation.

The debate over whether conservative religious wedding vendors should be coerced into providing services for same-sex marriage ceremonies has been compared by gay rights advocates to the lunch counters of the Jim Crow South.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0715/Is-wedding-photography-art-A-wrinkle-in-religious-liberty-debate

This case should be a no-brainer.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Is wedding photography ar...