Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:40 PM Apr 2016

A closer look at Jehovah’s Witnesses living in the U.S.



APRIL 26, 2016
BY MICHAEL LIPKA

The death of superstar musician Prince has prompted many reflections on his life – including his religious faith. Prince, who was raised as a Seventh-day Adventist, became a Jehovah’s Witness as an adult and attended services in his home state of Minnesota.

Jehovah’s Witnesses, who make up just less than 1% of U.S. adults, are known for their door-to-door proselytism. But members of this denomination, which has its origins in 19th-century America, are also unique in many other ways. Here are a few facts about Jehovah’s Witnesses in the United States today, based on Pew Research Center’s Religious Landscape Study:

Demographics

Jehovah’s Witnesses are among the most racially and ethnically diverse religious groups in America. No more than four-in-ten members of the group belong to any one racial and ethnic background: 36% are white, 32% are Hispanic, 27% are black and 6% are another race or mixed race.

Most Jehovah’s Witnesses – roughly two-thirds (65%) – are women, while only 35% are men. Christians worldwide are more likely to be women than men, but this gender gap is particularly large in the context of U.S. Christian groups. For instance, 54% of U.S. Catholics are women.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/26/a-closer-look-at-jehovahs-witnesses-living-in-the-u-s/
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A closer look at Jehovah’s Witnesses living in the U.S. (Original Post) rug Apr 2016 OP
they're 1. why we don't legally have to Pledge Allegiance and 2. the closest thing to Orwell's MisterP Apr 2016 #1
They are responsible for a good half dozen Supreme Court cases. rug Apr 2016 #3
I really don't understand most of their views, such as their opposition struggle4progress Apr 2016 #2
In a nutshell, they are literalists. rug Apr 2016 #4

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
1. they're 1. why we don't legally have to Pledge Allegiance and 2. the closest thing to Orwell's
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 11:00 PM
Apr 2016

Oceania that any researcher has found

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
3. They are responsible for a good half dozen Supreme Court cases.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 06:30 AM
Apr 2016

I miss the Oceania reference.They are explicitly nonpolitical.

struggle4progress

(118,294 posts)
2. I really don't understand most of their views, such as their opposition
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 11:16 PM
Apr 2016

to evolutionary theory, but I like their uncompromising pacifism, and I respect the personal integrity that led many of them to death in Nazi dungeons for their refusal to give the Hitler salute

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. In a nutshell, they are literalists.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 07:39 AM
Apr 2016

Unfortunately, their translation of the words they rely on are widely seen as mistranslations.

I agree with you though. By and far they have great personal integrity.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»A closer look at Jehovah’...