Religion
Related: About this forumFrank Schaeffer: "Why I am an Atheist Who Believes in GOD" | Talks at Google
August 19, 2015 by Frank Schaeffer
Two weeks ago I had the honor and pleasure of being invited to give a Talks at Google at Googles building in Cambridge MA. I spoke on my spiritual journey out of the religious right to sanity and my book, WHY I AM AN ATHEIST WHO BELIEVES IN GOD: How to give love, create beauty and find peace . Then GOOGLE gave a copy to every employee who attended the talk.
The talk (like all Talks at Google) was streamed to all the other Google offices worldwide. Now they just put it up on YouTube.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/frankschaeffer/2015/08/my-google-talks-talk-please-watch/
immoderate
(20,885 posts)The main difference between us, beside that I was never a believer, is that I don't like rituals! Aside from that, I can relate to what he said about paradoxes, and expectations of perfection.
--imm
Jim__
(14,083 posts)... and find peace"
From Amazon's blurb:
Bookmarking to listen later.
MellowDem
(5,018 posts)"atheist vision of a cold, meaningless universe". Atheism doesn't necessitate that you think the universe is meaningless, it's a really tired trope, and it makes me doubt this video will have much of anything interesting to say.
rug
(82,333 posts)It simply is nonbelief in a god(s).
So, in that sense it's meaningless.
MellowDem
(5,018 posts)Doesn't tell you whether you think the universe is meaningless or not.
That's the tired trope.
The word itself certainly isn't meaningless, I'm not sure what you're getting at there.
rug
(82,333 posts)To the extent someone wants it, he or she will have to look elsewhere.
Yorktown
(2,884 posts)Is he also a Marxist who believes in Capitalism?
Or a vegeterian cannibal?
Or a murderous angel?
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)dissonance or being intellectually dishonest. Not sure. However, from any reasonable point of view, while he could claim to hold opposing ideas such as theism and atheism in his head, in reality, he cannot, at least not consistently.
He also mislabels agnosticism, atheism, theism, puts a lot of weight(and belief) in Spiritism, etc.
He can, if he were honest, call himself a Christian who entertains doubts. But he's trying to sell a book, and controversy(and atheism!) sells.
He also seems to grossly fail to understand methodological materialism and puts far too much weight on subjective experience and emotion in informing reality. In general, it doesn't.
He makes erroneous assumptions about "fundamentalist" or "new" atheists as well, to the point of being insulting.
Oh, and he propagates misconceptions of evolution and other sciences as well.