Religion
Related: About this forumIs creating false guilt for profit by religions a good moral tenet?
Is creating false guilt for profit by religions a good moral tenet?
One of the lies for profit by the Churches seems to be the invention of hell to instill fear and loosen the purse strings and increase the indulgences people pay to save their souls, which were never condemned in the first place.
Another example of this for profit lying by Christianity would be Original Sin. This was something unknown to the Jews who have a different interpretation of their myths. To them, Eden was where we were elevated, not where we fell.
Is creating false guilt for profit a good moral tenet and should a religion that does so be followed?
Or would God forbid such a sin and curse those religions to hell?
Regards
DL
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)The church used hell to install fear.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)And guilt trips are by no means the exclusive domain of organized religions.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)phil89
(1,043 posts)If there's no hell? What's the salvation from?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)It is a saving act that opens up heaven to us all.
At least that is what i believe in.
Greatest I am
(235 posts)and which religion do you follow if any?
I am and people ask about Hitler and such. How do you get him into heaven if you are a Universalist.
Regards
DL
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I believe in the extreme mercy of God.
I think most or all go to heaven. If a soul is too evil then I think it no longer exists after death and judgement.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)I don't remember when or how this came up on DU. Someone quoted a christian thinker (Thomas of Aquin?) that it's okay to lie if you do it in the service of spreading Christianity.
From there it seems like a small step to me to categorize "get funding for your church" as "spread your religion".
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Greatest I am
(235 posts)of allowing sin that led to the Inquisition.
If lies are ok then so is killing.
Regards
DL
edhopper
(33,587 posts)it is not allowable to lie in any circumstances. But there is wiggle room in holding back the truth.
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)BELIVING is the first mistake anyone makes. By following any religion one allows someone else to interpret what is and isn't for them without understanding what is happening or what is actually at stake for doing so.
something I stated to another poster last night...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=260141
Greatest I am
(235 posts)Regards
DL
cbayer
(146,218 posts)The trick comes into determining who is creating false guilt and who is not.
threatening with a "hell" that has yet to be demonstrated to exist, they are at best dishonest.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)There are many who truly believe in hell. If that is a part of their belief system, and there is neither proof for nor against it's existence, I don't think you can call that dishonesty.
Dishonesty would be if they did not believe it, but pushed it for a specific gain.
The assumption that it is a lie comes from your own mindset of non-beleif but can not be applied to others.
Greatest I am
(235 posts)who has condemned his creation are liars.
All who claim a God who is an individual other than a man are also liars.
Regards
DL
cbayer
(146,218 posts)are liars.
Regards,
cb
trotsky
(49,533 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Basically the message is give to the church and you will be blessed.
Hell and indulgences were the stick.
Now they use a carrot but the common denominator is guilt.
edhopper
(33,587 posts)perplexing. We are all born of sin (I guess that's cause mom and dad had sex) and Jesus died for our sins. But we are still sinners who must ask for forgiveness, so why did Jesus die if it didn't help with our sins?