Religion
Related: About this forumPope Francis: the choice to not have children is selfish
Source: The Guardian
Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Grosseto
Wednesday 11 February 2015 20.44 GMT
Pope Francis has chided couples who choose not to have children , saying the decision was a selfish act.
The statement, which he made in his general audience in St Peters Square, will be seen as especially controversial in Italy, which has recorded a steady drop in its birth rate for decades.
A society with a greedy generation, that doesnt want to surround itself with children, that considers them above all worrisome, a weight, a risk, is a depressed society, the pope said.
The choice to not have children is selfish. Life rejuvenates and acquires energy when it multiplies: It is enriched, not impoverished.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/11/pope-francis-the-choice-to-not-have-children-is-selfish
Siwsan
(26,281 posts)Or am I missing something.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)But he can read the minds of everyone ELSE who has decided not to have children and know that THEIR reasons are selfish. And then pass judgement on them.
What a sick, arrogant piece of shit he is. How dare he judge ANYONE that way? And how can anyone with a conscience support or praise someone like this?
MADem
(135,425 posts)He usually hits 'em out of the park--he swung and missed this time!
Oh well, even Babe Ruth struck out on occasion!
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)This is just business development.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)He can bite my childless ass!
riversedge
(70,265 posts)Personally I think telling women any discussion of their equality is "off the table", telling people fighting for marriage equality that they are on Satan's side, and seeking to deny reproductive choice to everyone (Catholic or not) is a bit more than "rude."
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Gives a nice speech and almost everyone lines up to kiss his shoes. Gives a bad one and almost everyone says, we don't understand, or he's just playing to the cardinals or whatever excuse they give.
I'm sick of the repulsive adoration of this individual who denies me my existence as a person. Somehow I'm confused or the agent of Satan or something less than human. I am sick, sick, sick of it and the total and utter moral bankrupt sideshow of his toadies.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)niyad
(113,490 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Wrong choice of words.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)What about couples who decide not to have children cause of economic problems. Maybe they'll wait until things get better for them so they can take care of their children. Very unselfish decision. Mind your business Pope. Then I knew of couples who planned on having children, well to do and were horrible parents.
Mariana
(14,859 posts)It's selfish, you know, to refrain from having children just because you can't afford to feed, house, and clothe them.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Agnes, before you press the alert button, the point about Catholics not breeding like rabbits was raised by Pope Francis a couple of weeks ago.
You can look it up in the Google tubes.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Wouldn't want to get a post hidden for simply quoting the pope!
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)msongs
(67,430 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)how can you smack them when they get out of line?
Just don't breed like rabbits, OK?
Wait, it's OK to breed like rabbits.
Over a billion people call this guy boss. Is that fucked up or what?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Isn't not having children you are not responsible enough to raise properly the responsible thing to do?
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)HeiressofBickworth
(2,682 posts)of foregoing parenthood when one knows they carry a defective gene that would produce a child who would suffer their whole life?
It all points to the conclusion that reasons for not wanting to reproduce are as varied and wide as the population at large. How DARE a guy in a dress on a throne in Rome pass any judgment on the intentions of people who do not chose to reproduce. PIG!
Panich52
(5,829 posts)Mariana
(14,859 posts)Trillo
(9,154 posts)I love my children, and I could never voluntarily bring them to this pit of hell.
niyad
(113,490 posts)niyad
(113,490 posts)or are you just worried about the pool of victims drying up?
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)None of them are selfish reasons.
I have several mental and neurological disorders that I would NOT want to pass on. Because of these disorders, I don't see myself capable of raising children. What would be selfish would be if I DID have children, knowing they would likely be born with some kind of disorder and knowing I would not be prepared to take care of them.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Francis should have gotten married and had children if he believes it is important.
Again we have another privileged male telling us what to do with our lives.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)bulloney
(4,113 posts)Isn't that selfish?
I know several families of 10 or more children. The oldest was usually sentenced to a life of raising the younger siblings because mother is incapacitated during the pregnancy or the recovery from pregnancy. In most of those cases, that oldest child couldn't get out of the house fast enough. And they typically have only one or two children, if that many.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)One statement actually has weight, the other is just silly.