Private lives, public verdicts: Employment, law and religion

[cbayer]

http://www.economist.com/blogs/erasmus/2015/02/employment-law-and-religion

Feb 6th 2015, 19:39 BY B.C


Getty Images

PEOPLE who work for religious organisations, or in jobs subject to religious control, should think carefully about the consequences for their personal lives. They cannot claim the right to privacy that an employee of a secular organisation would expect. That seems to be the message that courts on both sides of the Atlantic are handing down.

Take the case of Alyce Conlon, who used to be a "spiritual director" for an evangelical organisation that works on American campuses and tries to persuade students to lead Christian lives. Her employer, the InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, proclaims that it "believes in the sanctity of marriage and desires that all married employees honour their marriage vows." In March 2011 she told her bosses that she was having marital difficulties, and was put on leave (initially paid, then unpaid) and told to try repairing her marriage. She was dismissed at the end of the year for failing to heal the domestic rift. She sued her employers for discrimination, asserting that two male colleagues had been treated less harshly when their marriages failed.

Yesterday a federal appeals court rejected her grievance, citing the "religious exception" to employment discrimination cases. It drew on the so-called Hosanna-Tabor case, settled by the Supreme Court in 2012, when the court unanimously ruled that federal discrimination laws do not apply to religious leaders at religious organisations. A teacher who was laid off from a Lutheran school in Michigan failed in her complaint on grounds that she was technically a minister.

If Ms Conlon's case had been on the other side of the Atlantic, she might not have fared much better. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) last year rejected the case of a Spanish retired teacher and former priest who was laid off, at the behest of the church, because he married and joined a movement in favour of married priests. In both cases, the courts gave decisive weight to the "freedom" of religious bodies to act according to their own principles.

more at link

[skepticscott]

1. Why are people surprised

that they are treated in a sexist, bigoted fashion when they willingly work for and embrace the sexism and bigotry of religious organizations? Do they only support and enable such beliefs because they think the ugliness will never touch them personally?