Religion
Related: About this forumPope Francis slams ‘deviant forms of religion’ after Charlie Hebdo attack
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
12 JAN 2015 AT 06:22 ET
Pope Francis on Monday slammed deviant forms of religion following deadly attacks by Islamist militants in France last week which left 17 people dead.
Losing their freedom, people become enslaved, whether to the latest fads, or to power, money, or even deviant forms of religion, he said, laying the blame on a culture of rejection which leads to the breakdown of society and spawning violence and death.
We see painful evidence of this in the events reported daily in the news, not least the tragic slayings which took place in Paris a few days ago, he said in his yearly speech to the members of the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See.
###
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/pope-francis-slams-deviant-forms-of-religion-after-charlie-hebdo-attack/
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Whose own religion -- not that long ago -- burned people alive for wanting to read the bible in their native language.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)knows well the horrors committed against people of his own by his Church. This man is taking on a highly institutionalized culture and system of beliefs. I don't envy what he is up against.
But in the present context of the news, Francis's comments are important. Especially after Faux Snooze and the nit wit Prez of the Catholic League or whatever it's called championed the blame the victim side of things.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014983618
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Like those that would deprive women of their reproductive rights and equality, transsexuals of the right to live their lives as they want, and homosexuals of the right to love and marry, right?
Yeah, fuck those deviant forms of religion. All people should have equal rights.
TygrBright
(20,772 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)transferring them from wherever they got outed to a fresh parish to victimize. Is that what he meant?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)I would hope that's what he meant!
bvf
(6,604 posts)that that's not what he meant?
If this guy was serious about reform, he'd hit the talk show circuit to explain himself. I mean, why not?
rug
(82,333 posts)from the Paris murders to child abuse.
Journeyman
(15,041 posts)edhopper
(33,635 posts)Is he still pissed at Martin Luther?
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)Coming just four days after the reinstatement of the Latin mass, yesterday's document left no doubt about the Pope's eagerness to back traditional Roman Catholic practices and attitudes, even at the expense of causing offence.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/jul/11/catholicism.religion
trotsky
(49,533 posts)The new guy is totally different from what I've heard, despite not changing a single thing.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)But the point stands that you'll find different viewpoints on religious deviance, depending on who you ask.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Still, I like that he is making a distinction here and further marginalizing extremists.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)"People who do things we do not like are not true followers of religions that have, over both time and geography, become so varied that they can barely be defined in propositional terms."
It's a desultory tune, for certain. But at least it's tolerant.