Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Wed Oct 29, 2014, 03:01 PM Oct 2014

‘Atheist creationists’ say their study proves there is no Jesus in your communion wafer

Eric W. Dolan
29 Oct 2014 at 10:21 ET

A DNA analysis proves that Holy Communion is a “fraud,” according to a hedonistic religious sect that believes humans were created by extraterrestrials about 25,000 years ago.

The Association of Raelian Scientists published a study on October 25 they say refutes the Catholic claim of transubstantiation, in which bread and wine and actually become the physical body and blood of Jesus Christ.

- snip -

The Raelian movement was founded in the 1970s by former French auto racing journalist Claude Vorilhon, who changed his name to Rael after a “dramatic encounter” with extraterrestrial human beings. Raelians believe these humans from another planet — not a divine being — created all forms of life on Earth.

“Yet there’s a very important difference between most atheists and the Raelians: We’re still Creationists! The Raelian Movement is an atheistic religion that is preparing humanity to welcome back its true creators, the Elohim, without fear or guilt.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/atheist-creationists-say-their-study-proves-there-is-no-jesus-in-your-communion-wafer/

http://atheistcreationist.org/news/dna-analysis-of-consecrated-sacramental-bread-refutes-catholic-transubstantiation-claim.html

http://www.rael.org/

Well, I'll be damned. Sure enough, the Raelians have no belief in a god.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
1. Kind of weird. One group with a strange belief
Wed Oct 29, 2014, 04:09 PM
Oct 2014

of creation investigating another church's belief.
Pot calling the kettle something.

Cartoonist

(7,321 posts)
4. Too deep for me
Wed Oct 29, 2014, 05:26 PM
Oct 2014

Maybe a handful of atheists know what this is about and believe it to be something new and real. On the other hand, EVERY Catholic believes in transubstantiation, or they aren't Catholics.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
6. This group is right up there with Heaven's Gate.
Thu Oct 30, 2014, 07:48 AM
Oct 2014


And neither have a clue about the doctrine of transubstantiation.

Cartoonist

(7,321 posts)
7. The Doctrine is out
Thu Oct 30, 2014, 09:09 AM
Oct 2014

Are you kidding me? I compare the doctrine of transubstantiation with the doctrine of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. In other words, don't waste my time trying to explain either one.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
10. I know a GREAT deal of catholics, lay and clergy,
Thu Oct 30, 2014, 10:51 PM
Oct 2014

that claim the bread and wine literally and actually become the body and blood of Christ. That they don't use the term DNA doesn't really change the claim, does it?

struggle4progress

(118,332 posts)
11. The thread is about a Raelian remark:
Thu Oct 30, 2014, 10:59 PM
Oct 2014

“Nobody can contest a simple DNA test like that conducted by our scientists”

okasha

(11,573 posts)
12. Since you were once a "seminarian"
Thu Oct 30, 2014, 11:58 PM
Oct 2014

you should understand Aquinas's distinction between accident and substance, no?

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
16. Love your attempts to diminish my experiences with quotation marks.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 12:48 PM
Oct 2014

We should probably credit this to Aristotle with some modification by Aquinas.

And, yes, I am familiar.

You need a period at the end of your subject line.
"you" in the body of the post should be capitalized.

Response to Goblinmonger (Reply #10)

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
14. Why in the world have they wasted the time, energy and money on this?
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 12:27 AM
Oct 2014

Do they think proving that will make their religion more plausible?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»‘Atheist creationists’ sa...