Religion
Related: About this forumReligious right halts campaign
Created on Saturday, 10 May 2014 08:26. | Written by Steve Law.
Oregon Family Council and its allies announced late Friday afternoon that they will suspend signature-gathering on their Protect Religious Freedom Initiative, in light of a court-ordered ballot title the group found would hurt the measure's chances among voters.
The group and its allies on the Christian right wanted to create an exception in Oregon's civil rights law that protects sexual minorities, so people of faith could decline to provide services in same-sex weddings or other commitment ceremonies. Under current interpretations of Oregon law, a baker, florist or other service provider can be found guilty of discrimination if they refuse to provide services for a same-sex couple's marriage or commitment ceremony.
A statement released by the group Friends of Religious Freedom said supporters would focus on legal challenges rather than going to the Oregon ballot. The group lamented that the court-ordered measure summary that would go before voters describes the requested exemption from the law as "intolerant instead of protecting equal rights of conscience."
The decision to halt the initiative campaign came the same day much of Oregons business establishment lined up to oppose the initiative. Nike, Columbia Sportswear, the Oregon Business Association and the Portland Business Association are among some 160 business affiliates signing a print ad in opposition to the measure. That ad reads: We want Oregon to be a great place to start and grow a business, and a place where employees can thrive in an inclusive work environment and welcoming community.
http://portlandtribune.com/pt/9-news/220303-81103-religious-right-halts-campaign
Their hand has been played out.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Hoping to see more and more of this.
Thank you Oregonians!
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)dickthegrouch
(3,174 posts)Just for future reference
rug
(82,333 posts)The title is:
http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2014/052dbt.pdf
They sued because the wording suggests they were in fact discriminating but were exempt from punishment if the discrimination was based on religious belief.
They sued to change it. They lost. Lol.
Here's more:
http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2014/05/proponents-drop-oregon-conscience.html