Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 09:55 AM Mar 2014

Philip Pullman condemns the "terrible things" Islamic extremists have "done to young girls"



Allowing religion to have political influence turns it into something “cruel and wicked”, the author Philip Pullman has argued, as he condemns the “terrible things” Islamic extremists have “done to young girls in the name of religion”.


Pullman, the author of the His Dark Materials trilogy, said society must resist allowing religion to “pry into places it doesn’t belong”, including politics.


Speaking of religious zealots of all denominations, he added power had now been given to a “group of men who have an unhealthy interest in other people’s sexuality”.


Pullman has previously been accused of blasphemy for his 2009 book “The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ”, with his Dark Materials trilogy being banned from some American schools.


In 2001, he reportedly told the Washington Post he was “trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief” with his work.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10701275/Philip-Pullman-condemns-the-terrible-things-Islamic-extremists-have-done-to-young-girls-in-its-name.html

The Telegraph does the interview and Mr. Pullman a disservice. He is not singling out Islam, he is a comprehensive anti-theist. The interview is about the negative influence of religion on political systems.
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Philip Pullman condemns the "terrible things" Islamic extremists have "done to young girls" (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 OP
The thing that annoys me is that the neocons were lying about "spreading liberal democracy". CJCRANE Mar 2014 #1
Cue the apologists skepticscott Mar 2014 #2
While we're at it, Christians chopped off some skin from the tip of my dick. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #3
Was it done fot religious reasons okasha Mar 2014 #6
It was done because my parents were christian, and that's what christians do, apparently. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #7
No! I am a Christian and I can tell you there is no rule on that. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #10
And yet they do. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #11
But it is not a religiousvthing but cultural. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #12
Where did they get the idea? AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #13
my parents did it for health reasons. They are not Christians. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #14
And where did they get that idea? AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #15
Baptism is not useless. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #16
For me it was. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #17
It is unless one needs a bath. cleanhippie Mar 2014 #18
Usless to you but not to everyone. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #19
Do you believe that newborn children need to have satan cast out of them? Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #25
Baptism is a rite of entrance into the church. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #29
Oh, right the anglicans dropped the casting out of satan part. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #30
I have never seen it as casting out the devil. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #31
read up on the original ceremony. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #32
Well the rite used by churches today is simpler and more closer to what the bible says of it. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #33
At the risk of shocking tbe Biblical literalists smong us, okasha Mar 2014 #24
I don't know how this thread got to be about circumcision, but you are correct. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #26
The probable subject is actually clitoridectomy. Brettongarcia Mar 2014 #27
See posts okasha Mar 2014 #34
Most Christians don't LeftishBrit Mar 2014 #28
From almost the beginning, Christianity has held that circumcision is not important struggle4progress Mar 2014 #8
And yet they do. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #9
That's not a very big reason to be an atheist. rug Mar 2014 #20
It's on The List(TM) AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #21
I bet Prosense missed that item. rug Mar 2014 #22
I think I just stumbled across an inside joke. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #23
Also, thank you. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #4
The Telegraph quoting the Mail quoting Pullman. rug Mar 2014 #5

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
1. The thing that annoys me is that the neocons were lying about "spreading liberal democracy".
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:14 AM
Mar 2014

They were all about taking away our rights and spreading religious fundamentalism at home and abroad.

Hence the world we see today in the 21st century.


 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
2. Cue the apologists
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:26 AM
Mar 2014

falling all over themselves to argue that religion had nothing to do with this, and that if it weren't religion these same people would have been motivated to do this by something else, like the doorknob or the table lamp.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
3. While we're at it, Christians chopped off some skin from the tip of my dick.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:46 AM
Mar 2014

Without my consent.

If someone tried to do it to me today, it would be a Death or Glory moment in their lives, I assure you.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
6. Was it done fot religious reasons
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 02:50 PM
Mar 2014

or because it was a routine health measure at the time? Christianity does not require circumcision.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
7. It was done because my parents were christian, and that's what christians do, apparently.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 02:55 PM
Mar 2014

That's also why they baptized me.

Buncha nonsense. I'm not a Christian. And I can't get my foreskin back.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
11. And yet they do.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:53 PM
Mar 2014

I agree there is no commandment/rule to do so. Yet they do.

The US is an odd duck in this regard, alone, among western societies. Nobody seems to be able to pin down precisely why, but it is prevalent among white Christians, even though christianity has no such commandments.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
15. And where did they get that idea?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 05:05 PM
Mar 2014

20th century American medical science? Not so much.

I agree the perpetuation of it is not as simple as 'RELIGION!!!'. But it's a major factor. Certainly was for my parents. I asked. It's what they thought was 'normal'. Same with the useless baptism.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
30. Oh, right the anglicans dropped the casting out of satan part.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:56 PM
Mar 2014

It was ridiculous. Yes indeed as a ceremony of inclusion it is useful.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
24. At the risk of shocking tbe Biblical literalists smong us,
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:49 PM
Mar 2014

I must point out that I have seen probably more than my fair share of uncut young Catholic men in my life drawing classes. Infant circumcision became common in the US when hospital births became the norm. Doctors advised it as a matter of "personal hygiene," and most people assumed the doctors knew what they were talking about.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
26. I don't know how this thread got to be about circumcision, but you are correct.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 06:41 AM
Mar 2014

Circumcision became a secular custom in the US, and outside of the islamic and jewish faiths, generally not a religious one.

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
27. The probable subject is actually clitoridectomy.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 08:34 AM
Mar 2014

That's a religious procedure which is rather more serious than Jewish circumcision. It's the removal of the female clitoris. Often for religious reasons.

That's one among many other forms of genital mutilation. Though we might consider castration too; often performed for religious reasons as well.

LeftishBrit

(41,212 posts)
28. Most Christians don't
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 08:41 AM
Mar 2014

Circumcision is a requirement for religious Jews and Muslims; and some Christians and people of other faiths do it for cultural reasons.

In the UK, it is very rare for anyone to be circumcised unless they are either Jews or Muslims, or done for a medical reason. It may be that some Christian sects do so, but it's not a universal part of Christianity.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
9. And yet they do.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:42 PM
Mar 2014

I can't explain it. All I know, is that I too have been disfigured.

That said, it doesn't compare much to the horrors visited upon women, explicitly in the name of religion.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
4. Also, thank you.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:47 AM
Mar 2014

Too often, things get posted without commentary or explanation by the poster. Breath of fresh air to see you clarify there. Thank you.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Philip Pullman condemns t...