Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 11:34 AM Jan 2014

Map: Publically Funded Schools That Teach Creationism

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/01/creationism_in_public_schools_mapped_where_tax_money_supports_alternatives.html

JAN. 26 2014 6:30 PM
Map: Publically Funded Schools That Teach Creationism

Thousands of schools in states across the country take taxpayer money to cast doubt on basic science.

By Chris Kirk

A large, publicly funded charter school system in Texas is teaching creationism to its students, Zack Kopplin recently reported in Slate. Creationist teachers don’t even need to be sneaky about it—the Texas state science education standards, as well as recent laws in Louisiana and Tennessee, permit public school teachers to teach “alternatives” to evolution. Meanwhile, in Florida, Indiana, Ohio, Arizona, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere, taxpayer money is funding creationist private schools through state tuition voucher or scholarship programs. As the map below illustrates, creationism in schools isn’t restricted to schoolhouses in remote villages where the separation of church and state is considered less sacred. If you live in any of these states, there’s a good chance your tax money is helping to convince some hapless students that evolution (the basis of all modern biological science, supported by everything we know about geology, genetics, paleontology, and other fields) is some sort of highly contested scientific hypothesis as credible as “God did it.”


more at link, including map which I am unable to link to
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Map: Publically Funded Schools That Teach Creationism (Original Post) cbayer Jan 2014 OP
Creationism is definitely NOT a science. It is merely a religious based notion about how things ladjf Jan 2014 #1
I think most people here would agree with you. cbayer Jan 2014 #3
If it's true that creationists are mainly trying to disprove Evolution, ladjf Jan 2014 #8
"What would the course syllabus look like for full year course?" KansDem Jan 2014 #6
That's hilarious, KansDem! cbayer Jan 2014 #12
Who accredits these schools and who accepts that accreditation? Downwinder Jan 2014 #2
Looks to me like state boards of education are doing just that. cbayer Jan 2014 #4
Wonder if these high school diplomas are accepted by Downwinder Jan 2014 #5
Good question. cbayer Jan 2014 #7
OTOH is LSU going to require creationism? Downwinder Jan 2014 #10
I doubt it, but it looks like they are going to have to deal with it. cbayer Jan 2014 #11
I can not believe they are teaching this in schools in this day and age. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #9
I can not believe people think a person rose from the dead in this day and age. cleanhippie Jan 2014 #13
oh you! hrmjustin Jan 2014 #14
Just poking a little fun at you. cleanhippie Jan 2014 #15
If you are using pure logic it would be difficult to see him rising from the dead. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #16
So it's just the "in school" part you disagree with, not the teaching of absurdities to children? cleanhippie Jan 2014 #17
If parents want to teach their children creationism that is their right. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #18
If I'm reading you right, teaching creationism is "cringe worthy" but teaching resurrection is not? cleanhippie Jan 2014 #19
Well the resurrection is a matter of faith. People have the right to bring their kids up in their hrmjustin Jan 2014 #20
I agree. I just find it difficult to comprehend how you can hold such contradictory positions cleanhippie Jan 2014 #21
Well life is complicated and so is faith. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #22
Well, good luck with that. cleanhippie Jan 2014 #23
I understand why you feel as you do. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #24
Thats all I can ask for. cleanhippie Jan 2014 #25
Tennessee doesn't surprise me Rob H. Jan 2014 #26
Is this being contested in court? Jim__ Jan 2014 #27
I'm not sure, but it should be. cbayer Jan 2014 #28
In the UK, state-funded schools cannot teach creationism as scientific fact.. LeftishBrit Jan 2014 #29
Well, I would think that state-funded schools in the US can teach cbayer Jan 2014 #30

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
1. Creationism is definitely NOT a science. It is merely a religious based notion about how things
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 11:41 AM
Jan 2014

to be. Creationism isn't even teachable beyond a couple of paragraphs. What would the course syllabus look like for full year course?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
3. I think most people here would agree with you.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 11:53 AM
Jan 2014

That is why this is so disturbing.

I think they spend a lot of time "teaching" why evolution isn't true.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
8. If it's true that creationists are mainly trying to disprove Evolution,
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 12:02 PM
Jan 2014

they are fighting an uphill task. nt

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
7. Good question.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 12:01 PM
Jan 2014

Were I reviewing these candidates, I would certainly want to look closely at what they were taught (and not taught).

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
15. Just poking a little fun at you.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jan 2014

On a more serious note, can you see how contradictory your positions are?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
16. If you are using pure logic it would be difficult to see him rising from the dead.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 12:35 PM
Jan 2014

This is where faith kicks in. But I do not want public schools teaching either.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
18. If parents want to teach their children creationism that is their right.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jan 2014

I find it cringe worthy because of all we know about our origins now.

I do nit want it taught in public schools.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
19. If I'm reading you right, teaching creationism is "cringe worthy" but teaching resurrection is not?
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 01:03 PM
Jan 2014

We can agree about not teaching any of it in public schools. I'm talking about the larger issue of teaching children absurdities as fact.

How can you see creationism as "cringe worthy" while seeing a person being resurrected from the dead is perfectly normal?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
20. Well the resurrection is a matter of faith. People have the right to bring their kids up in their
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 01:07 PM
Jan 2014

faith traditions.

Yes creationism is a matter of faith for some and they have the right to teach that to children.

To you they both seem absurd but to Christians it does not. It is a matter of what you believe in.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
21. I agree. I just find it difficult to comprehend how you can hold such contradictory positions
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 01:11 PM
Jan 2014

at the same time, in the same sentence, and seemingly not be affected by it at all.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
23. Well, good luck with that.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 01:16 PM
Jan 2014

Please forgive me if I fail to give your admonition of creationism the same weight I would to a non-believer. Surely you understand why?

Jim__

(14,083 posts)
27. Is this being contested in court?
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 05:59 PM
Jan 2014

The courts have consistently ruled against creationism, but Edwards v Aguillard does seem to leave some wiggle room:

Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) was a legal case about the teaching of creationism that was heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1987. The Court ruled that a Louisiana law requiring that creation science be taught in public schools, along with evolution, was unconstitutional because the law was specifically intended to advance a particular religion. It also held that "teaching a variety of scientific theories about the origins of humankind to school children might be validly done with the clear secular intent of enhancing the effectiveness of science instruction."


cbayer

(146,218 posts)
28. I'm not sure, but it should be.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 06:14 PM
Jan 2014

It's basically religious beliefs being taught using taxpayer money.

I'm not sure there is a case for private schools, but Charter Schools present a big black hole.

LeftishBrit

(41,212 posts)
29. In the UK, state-funded schools cannot teach creationism as scientific fact..
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 06:46 PM
Jan 2014

There are, however, a few private schools that do; though it's much less common than in the USA.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
30. Well, I would think that state-funded schools in the US can teach
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 06:49 PM
Jan 2014

it as scientific fact either, but apparently I am wrong.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Map: Publically Funded Sc...